I am one of these people that is a little wary about what our future holds. And when I think about what you created, that Wikipedia wasn't just a repository of information, but it was a repository of trustworthy, or at least the perception of being trustworthy. And we're now in an era where everyone seems to disbelieve their own lionize for whatever reason, whether it's a distortion from A.I. or even before that, the idea of political discourse that has sort of bent the truth. So where does a place like Wik ...

We've seen a lot of opposition to it coming out already. I think it's going to get really significant scrutiny, not just in the United States by the Department of Justice, but likely also in Europe and by the U.K. and possibly some other jurisdictions as well. But, you know, they're going to look at these overlaps, which in this case are both horizontal.That's in streaming. They both provide stream both companies provide streaming services, but they're also vertical. You have a big streaming service buying ...

Even though we're a generation apart, there's a connection there is between us. >> I might as well spell it out now. Your mother and my grandmother were sisters.>> Yes. And your mother was my first cousin >> with whom you spent time in your growing up years when you both spent time in the same family house. >> Yes.>> Obviously, Midnight's Children is a work of fiction, but you you draw on the structure of your real of your true family. And >> my father was very annoyed. >> He was not the only one.I think ot ...

>> THIS IS "BALANCE OF POWER" LIVE FROM WASHINGTON, D. C. >> FROM BLOOMBERG’S WASHINGTON, D.C. , STUDIO AND TV AND RADIO. THE BEAUTIFUL GAME COMES TO WASHINGTON AND HIGH STAKES DIPLOMACY.PRESIDENT TRUMP TALKING WITH BIG POLITICAL LEADERS WITH KEY ISSUES AT STAKE. K-POP DEMON HUNTERS. MEET GAME OF THRONES AND THE NETFLIX PLAN TO BUY WARNER BROTHERS AND HURDLES ON THE HORIZON, COULD THERE BE A PLOT TWIST.BORN IN THE U.S.A. , WILL THAT GUARANTEE U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND THE SUPREME COURT IS SETTING THE STAGE FOR A ...

Economic Overview & Strategic Differences - China's economy exhibits a two-speed dynamic, with a weak domestic consumption sector contrasted by strong export-oriented, cutting-edge industries [2][3] - Despite a slower domestic economy and property challenges, China possesses significant fiscal space due to lower governmental leverage compared to the US [5] - China's latest 5-year plan emphasizes premier status in cutting-edge technology industries [6] Technological Competitiveness - China has transitioned from importing drugs to exporting drug development capabilities, offering faster and cheaper drug development [7][8] - While the US may lead in AI adoption and company valuation, China possesses competitive AI models, potentially gaining global traction due to lower costs [9] - China's EV industry boasts high-quality cars at competitive prices, despite having numerous companies undergoing consolidation [11] Trade Relations & Geopolitical Strategy - China may not prioritize economic focus on the US, feeling self-sufficient in its economic strategies [12] - The US lost the last trade dispute with China, highlighting China's ability to source resources elsewhere and the US reliance on Chinese manufacturing [12][13][14] - The US strategy of slowing China down through trade actions is not viable; the only way for the US to "win" is by improving its own capabilities [18][25] Investment Opportunities & Risks - China's stock market valuations are relatively cheap compared to the S&P, presenting potential investment opportunities [20] - Chinese LLMs (Large Language Models) in AI are valued significantly lower (4-10 billion USD) than comparable models like OpenAI (500 billion USD), indicating potential value [21][22] - Investing in China is considered risky, requiring caution and expertise [19] Market Access & Consumer Impact - Chinese EVs are gaining popularity in Europe despite efforts to restrict them [15] - High tariffs on Chinese cars in the US deny consumers access to cheaper, better vehicles, costing an estimated 160 billion USD annually based on a 10,000 USD price difference on 16 million cars [15][16]

Legality of Military Action vs Police Action - The central question revolves around whether the actions against drug boats are considered legal, hinging on the perspective of whether it's a war or law enforcement scenario [1][2][3] - A second strike is deemed legitimate if the situation is classified as war, but not if it's considered law enforcement [3] - The President possesses considerable authority as commander in chief to initiate war and designate groups as terrorists, potentially justifying the Pentagon's actions [8] - The challenge to the President's authority and the legality of the strikes would likely need to be resolved in the courts [7][8] Political and Public Perception - Reactions to the strikes are heavily politicized, with Democrats expressing concerns and labeling it as potentially a case of murder [4] - Members of Congress hold differing views on the footage of the strikes, largely influenced by their political affiliations [6] - Public trust in the administration's intelligence regarding the individuals on the boats being drug traffickers is questionable, reflecting a broader skepticism towards official pronouncements [10][11] - Questioning the intelligence pronouncements from the intelligence community and the White House has become more prevalent [11] Evidence and Transparency - The administration emphasized having intelligence confirming drug trafficking activities [9] - The President supported the public release of the video footage related to the strikes [12] - Republicans who initially questioned the strikes became more comfortable with the narrative after viewing the video [13][14]

I was taking a look at Bloomberg Intelligence, their report out. They crunched the numbers and basically this deal, it's 24 5.2% times forward. If you think about recent studio M&A, it's closer to a range of 15.2% or 15 to 22 times.So you could make the case that this looks expensive and I wonder where you fall. I think everyone needs to keep in mind that Warner's value inside Netflix is exponentially larger than what it might be on a standalone basis. People are valuing the Warner asset as it is today, not ...

the the studies that I've seen um are saying that the World Cup could have an over $30 billion um economic impact for the entire United States, expecting over 6 million um visitors. So, this is this is a very big deal. Um not just for our region, but for the entire country.If you look at, you know, kind of the next 10 years here in the United States, this is really the decade of sports and the World Cup is kind of the kickoff of that, right. We've got the World Cup in 26, the LA Olympics in 28. Uh we've got ...

Where's your head on this. Do you plan to hold hearings on this deal. Well, I think everybody should just take a deep breath.You know, what we saw under the Biden administration was kind of an immediate knee jerk reaction to say, you know, any time he had two major names and they looked like they were even discussing a merger, that oftentimes there was a a just an onslaught of criticism. And then what what happened is once the regulators and the enforcers kind of took a look at it, it made sense for consume ...

going back into countries where we've been. >> Yeah. >> Like Denmark or Germany, which we just launched a brand new store.It's in Germany is probably, you know, it's more of a actually more of a toy ccentric market and definitely a teddy bear market. Okay. So, I mean, just we I said to someone earlier today, I'm like, "It's a bear market." I mean, no, no, I didn't mean that. I didn't mean that at all.So, but but there's a teddy bear market that we had lines around out and around the corner in both of these ...