Core Viewpoint - Raffles Interior (01376) has received an anonymous complaint questioning the competence of its Executive Director and Chairman, Zheng Nenghuan, due to multiple ongoing legal disputes involving significant financial implications [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Issues - Zheng Nenghuan is involved in over a hundred court disputes and lawsuits in China, with notable cases including a contract dispute amounting to approximately RMB 105 million and various financial lending disputes [1][2]. - Specific cases highlighted include: 1. A contract dispute where Zheng is a defendant, with an amount of RMB 105 million still in execution [1]. 2. A financial lending dispute leading to restrictions on high consumption due to court orders [1]. 3. A case involving a repayment obligation of RMB 70.42 million where Zheng was labeled a "dishonest executor" [1]. 4. Additional disputes related to private lending and financial contracts, spanning from 2014 to 2025 [2]. Group 2: Corporate Governance Concerns - The board of directors has raised concerns regarding Zheng's failure to disclose multiple ongoing lawsuits and the reasons for selective disclosure [2]. - The board's nomination committee, led by Chairman Chen Congfa, had previously approved Zheng's candidacy, but is now reviewing the situation in light of the complaints [2][3]. - The board is considering necessary actions to maintain overall integrity and is initiating an internal investigation to verify the details of the complaint [3].

Core Viewpoint - Raffles Interior (01376) faces serious allegations regarding the competence of its Executive Director and Chairman, Zheng Nenghuan, due to multiple ongoing legal disputes that raise concerns about his credibility and the company's governance [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Issues - Zheng Nenghuan is involved in over a hundred court disputes in China, primarily related to financial lending, equity transfers, and personal loan disputes, spanning from 2014 to 2025 [2][3]. - Specific cases include a contract dispute involving approximately RMB 105 million, a financial lending contract dispute leading to restrictions on high consumption, and multiple instances of being listed as a "dishonest executor" due to unpaid debts [1][2]. Group 2: Board's Response - The board of directors has raised questions regarding Zheng's failure to disclose ongoing lawsuits and the reasons for selective disclosure, emphasizing the need for transparency in accordance with listing rules [2][3]. - The nomination committee is currently reviewing potential actions to maintain the integrity of the board and is conducting an internal investigation to verify the details of the complaint [3].

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完整性亦不 發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部分內容而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任何損 失承擔任何責任。 Raffles Interior Limited （ 於開曼群島註冊成立的有限公司） （股份代號：1376） 內幕消息 接獲投訴信 有關董事會主席不勝任董事的指控 本公告乃由董事會根據聯交所證券上市規則（「上市規則」）第13.09 (2) (a)條及香港法例第571 章證券及期貨條例第XIVA部項下內幕消息條文（ 定義見上市規則）而作出。 董事會謹此知會本公司股東（「股東」），其於2025年11月22日接獲一封由自稱少數股東的匿 名投訴人所發出致（ 其中包括 ）香港聯合交易所有限公司及香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會 的投訴信（「投訴信」）；投訴信的標題為「 質疑執行董事兼董事會主席鄭能歡先生能否勝任董 事一職 」。 投 訴 信 包 含 一份以 鄭 能 歡 先 生（ 主 席 ）為 查 冊 對 象 的 訴 訟 查 冊 報 告（「 鄭 能 歡 訴 訟 查 冊 報 告 」）。 據 鄭 能 歡 訴 訟 查 冊 報 ...

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完整性亦不 發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部分內容而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任何損 失承擔任何責任。 Raffles Interior Limited （ 於開曼群島註冊成立的有限公司） （股份代號：1376） 澄清公告 短暫停牌 茲提述本公司於2025年11月25日所刊發有關「短暫停牌」的公告（「短暫停牌公告」）。本公司 董事會（「董事會」）謹此就短暫停牌公告作出以下澄清： – 1 – 1. 本 公 司 股 份 自 2025 年 11 月 25 日 上 午 九 時 十 七 分 起 暫 停 在 香 港 聯 合 交 易 所 有 限 公 司 買 賣； 2. 除短暫 停牌公 告所載 有關成立 調查委 員會及 委聘外 部法證 專家展開 內部調 查的內 幕消 息外， 董事會 謹此補 充，其已 接獲控 股股東 兼董事 會主席 要求撤換 董事會 全體其 他董 事（ 包括其餘兩名獨立非執行董事 ）的請求，而此構成本公司內幕消息。控股股東兼董 事會主席就上述要求所提出的理由輕率，董事會認為此乃針對董事會所有其他成員（ 包 ...

RAFFLESINTERIOR 分时图 日K线 周K线 月K线 0.13 0.00 2.36% 2.36% 2.36% 2.36% 2.36% 2.36% 2.36% 2.36% 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 09:30 10:30 12:00/13:00 14:00 16:10 0 0 1 1 RAFFLESINTERIOR(01376)公布，公司股份自2025年11月25日上午九时正起暂停在香港联合交易所有 限公司买卖，以待刊发有关成立调查委员会及委聘外部法证专家展开内部调查(构成公司内幕消息)的公 告。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Raffles Interior (01376) announced that its shares will be suspended from trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange starting from November 25, 2025, at 9:00 AM, pending the release of an announcement regarding the establishment of an investigation committee and the appointment of external forensic experts to conduct an internal investigation, which constitutes inside information [1] Group 1 - The company will have its shares suspended from trading [1] - The suspension is due to the need for an internal investigation [1] - An investigation committee and external forensic experts will be appointed [1]

智通财经APP讯，RAFFLESINTERIOR(01376)公布，公司股份自2025年11月25日上午九时正起暂停在香 港联合交易所有限公司买卖，以待刊发有关成立调查委员会及委聘外部法证专家展开内部调查( 构成公 司内幕消息)的公告。 ...

Raffles Interior Limited 香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完整性亦不 發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部分內容而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任何損 失承擔任何責任。 陳明輝 非執行董事 陸佩珊 獨立非執行董事 倪順發 獨立非執行董事 黃向明 於本公告日期，本公司執行董事為鄭能歡先生及陳明輝先生；本公司非執行董事為陸佩珊女士；及本公司獨 立非執行董事為倪順發先生、黃向明先生及陳聰發先生。 （ 於開曼群島註冊成立的有限公司） （股份代號：1376） 短暫停牌 應Raffles Interior Limited（「本公司」）要求，本公司股份自2025年11月25日上午九時正起暫停 在香港聯合交易所有限公司買賣，以待刊發有關成立調查委員會及委聘外部法證專家展開 內部調查（ 構成本公司內幕消息）的公告。 承董事會命 Raffles Interior Limited 執行董事 香港，2025年11月25日 ...

Core Points - Raffles Interior (01376) has announced a temporary suspension of its shares trading starting from November 25, 2025, at 9:17 AM [2] Group 1 - The company’s shares will be suspended from trading for a brief period [2]

Core Viewpoint - Raffles Interior Limited is facing allegations of conspiracy to defraud its minority shareholders related to a land transaction in Shenzhen, with significant discrepancies between the agreed contract price and the estimated market value of the asset [1][2] Group 1: Allegations and Complaints - An anonymous complaint was received by Raffles Interior Limited's board, alleging conspiracy to defraud the company and its minority shareholders [1] - The complaint includes an independent investigation into a land parcel in Shenzhen, which is subject to strict construction deadlines [2] - The estimated land value post-construction is RMB 120 million, significantly lower than the contract price of HKD 300 million, indicating potential misconduct [2] Group 2: Company Response - The board of directors has firmly decided not to proceed with the acquisition despite receiving the sales agreement, which was signed without proper authorization [2] - The board emphasizes the lack of supporting documents for the transaction, including identification of the counterparty and valuation reports [2] - A termination agreement for the sales contract is pending submission to the board, highlighting the board's responsibility to ensure the contract is legally terminated [2]