Market Overview - U.S. stock futures declined following a government shutdown that began on October 1, 2023, after Congress failed to agree on a spending plan [1][4] - Historical data indicates that government shutdowns typically have a short-lived and limited long-term impact on equities [1] Economic Indicators - The 10-year Treasury bond yielded 4.15%, while the two-year bond was at 3.60% [2] - Job openings in the U.S. rose by 19,000 to 7.227 million in August [5] - The Chicago Business Barometer fell to 40.6 in September, below market expectations [5] - The S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index increased by 1.8% year-over-year in July [5] Stock Performance - Major indices experienced declines in futures trading: Dow Jones down 0.56%, S&P 500 down 0.65%, Nasdaq 100 down 0.73%, and Russell 2000 down 0.70% [2] - The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) fell by 0.54% to $662.56, while Invesco QQQ Trust ETF (QQQ) declined by 0.62% to $596.66 [2] Sector Performance - Most sectors on the S&P 500 closed positively, with information technology, health care, and industrials showing the largest gains [3] - Energy and consumer discretionary sectors closed lower [3] Historical Trends - The S&P 500 gained over 3% in September, with the Dow up nearly 2% and the Nasdaq up 5.6% [4] - October has historically been a positive month for the S&P 500, with nearly 60% of Octobers since 1950 showing positive returns and an average gain of 0.89% [8][9] - The fourth quarter (October to December) is noted as the strongest three-month period for equities, with an average return of almost 2% since 1950, and over 6% in the past five years [12][17] Company Highlights - Nike Inc. reported better-than-expected first-quarter results, with earnings of 49 cents per share surpassing the consensus estimate of 27 cents, and sales of $11.720 billion exceeding the estimate of $11.000 billion [17] - Ryvyl Inc. surged 94.66% following a $75 million merger agreement [17] - Iron Horse Acquisitions Corp. jumped 47.43% after finalizing a business merger [17]

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Dow Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its financial condition and ability to manage macroeconomic challenges during the Class Period from January 30, 2025, to July 23, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations Against Dow Inc. - The lawsuit claims that Dow overstated its ability to mitigate macroeconomic and tariff-related headwinds, as well as to maintain financial flexibility for its dividend [3]. - It is alleged that the true impact of competitive pressures, softening global sales, and product oversupply on Dow's business was understated [3]. - The complaint asserts that Dow's public statements were materially false and misleading throughout the Class Period [3]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors in Dow can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiffs by October 28, 2025, or may choose to remain absent class members [4]. - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and selects counsel to direct the litigation [4]. - Participation as a lead plaintiff does not affect the ability to share in any recovery from the lawsuit [4]. Group 3: Law Firm Information - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP is handling the class action and has a reputation for recovering billions for victims of corporate misconduct [5]. - The firm encourages affected Dow investors to contact them for more information regarding the lawsuit [5].

Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:If you wish to learn more about this class action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to the pending class action lawsuit, please contact: Howard G. Smith, Esq., Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020, Call us at: (215) 638-4847Email us at: [email protected], Visit our website at: www.howardsmithlaw.com. Accessibility StatementSkip Navigation BENSALEM ...

Core Insights - Dow Inc. has launched DOWSIL 5-1050 Polymer Processing Aid (PPA) as a safer alternative to fluoropolymer-based PPAs for film packaging, addressing the industry's demand for high-quality films [1][9] - The new PPA is designed to mitigate melt fracture and die lip buildup, enhancing the manufacturing process and product quality [1][9] Company Overview - Dow is a key player in the chemical industry, alongside DuPont, Eastman Chemical, and Air Products, with extensive experience in compounding and extrusion [2] - The company focuses on sustainable innovations by integrating silicone additives into plastics [2] Product Details - DOWSIL 5-1050 PPA is supplied as a masterbatch with a silicone additive in a polyethylene carrier, facilitating its use in extrusion processes [3] - The product complies with EU and FDA safety regulations, ensuring its suitability for food packaging [3] - It has demonstrated effectiveness at an industrial scale, reducing downtime and scrap while improving film surface quality and visual appeal [3][4] Market Context - The packaging industry is transitioning away from fluoro-based PPAs, creating a demand for compliant alternatives like DOWSIL 5-1050 [4] - Dow's strategic initiatives are aimed at navigating industry challenges, including the emergence of new market entrants that are causing oversupply [5] Competitor Insights - DuPont projects consolidated net sales of approximately $12,850 million and adjusted EPS of about $4.40 for the third quarter of 2025 [6] - Eastman Chemical anticipates a challenging macroeconomic environment but expects to benefit from cost-reduction initiatives and higher revenues from its methanolysis facility [7] - Air Products is focusing on near-term projects and has updated its adjusted EPS guidance for fiscal 2025 to a range of $11.90 to $12.10 [8]

Core Viewpoint - S&P Dow Jones Indices is expanding into the private markets sector by launching the S&P Private Equity 50 Indices in collaboration with NewVest, aiming to meet the growing demand for data and benchmarks in this evolving asset class [1][2]. Group 1: Expansion into Private Markets - The S&P Private Equity 50 Indices will measure the performance of 50 of the largest available private equity funds over a year, providing insights into top funds in North American and European private equity [2][3]. - This initiative reflects S&P DJI's commitment to enhancing transparency and scalability in private markets, similar to its established benchmarks in public markets like the S&P 500 [2][3]. Group 2: Collaboration with NewVest - NewVest, a private markets index manager, will manage passively constructed private index portfolios targeting diversified exposure to major private markets funds globally [5]. - The collaboration aims to redefine private equity benchmarks as transparent and accountable, supporting initiatives like the U.S. effort to democratize access for 401(k) investors [2][5]. Group 3: Future Outlook - S&P DJI anticipates that private markets will increasingly play a significant role in portfolio construction and risk management, and is actively addressing the unique challenges within this space [3].

LOS ANGELES, Sept. 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP reminds investors of the upcoming October 28, 2025 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Dow Inc. (“Dow” or the “Company”) (NYSE: DOW) securities between January 30, 2025 and July 23, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR DOW INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS U ...

Group 1 - The article discusses a securities fraud class action lawsuit against Dow Inc. for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [2][3] - The lawsuit claims that Dow misrepresented its ability to handle macroeconomic challenges and maintain financial flexibility for dividends [3] - Investors who purchased Dow securities between January 30, 2025, and July 23, 2025, are eligible to participate in the lawsuit [2] Group 2 - A deadline for filing as a lead plaintiff in the class action is set for October 28, 2025 [4] - The law firm Bernstein Liebhard LLP has a history of recovering over $3.5 billion for clients and has been recognized for its litigation success [5]

Core Viewpoint - The content emphasizes the importance of conducting personal due diligence and consulting competent advisors before making any financial decisions, particularly in the context of investments and trading activities [1]. Group 1 - The website provides general news, personal analysis, and third-party content intended for educational and research purposes [1]. - It explicitly states that the information does not constitute any recommendation or advice for investment actions [1]. - Users are advised to perform their own research and consider their financial situation before making decisions [1]. Group 2 - The website includes information about complex financial instruments such as cryptocurrencies and contracts for difference (CFDs), which carry a high risk of losing money [1]. - It encourages users to understand how these instruments work and the associated risks before investing [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights three established companies—Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, and Sherwin-Williams—as reliable dividend stocks that can enhance passive income for investors, especially in the current market environment [2][20]. Coca-Cola - Coca-Cola has a strong history of dividend payments, having raised its dividend for 63 consecutive years, earning it the title of Dividend King [8]. - The company is currently experiencing solid organic growth and is diversifying its product lineup towards healthier options, such as Coca-Cola Zero Sugar and Diet Coke [7]. - Coca-Cola's stock is trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 23.6, below its 10-year median P/E of 27.7, and offers a dividend yield of 3.1% [8]. Procter & Gamble - Procter & Gamble is facing challenges due to inflation and cost-of-living pressures affecting consumers, which has led to its stock hovering around a 52-week low [9][10]. - The company has announced a restructuring plan that includes cutting 7,000 jobs and exiting certain brands and markets [10]. - P&G has a P/E ratio of 23.4 and a forward P/E of 21.8, with a dividend yield of 2.8%, making it appealing for risk-averse investors [14]. Sherwin-Williams - Sherwin-Williams has underperformed major indexes this year due to high interest rates impacting its end markets, but it has a strong history of dividend increases, with 46 consecutive years of raises [15][17]. - The company has a solid business model, selling products through various channels, and has seen its stock price increase by 352% over the last decade [17][18]. - Sherwin-Williams is considered a good buy for long-term investors, despite its current dividend yield of only 0.9% [17][18]. Investment Appeal - All three companies are characterized by their ability to pay growing and reliable dividends, making them suitable for investors looking for non-tech-focused investment opportunities [20]. - Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble are currently trading at discounted valuations compared to their historical averages, while Sherwin-Williams is in line with its 10-year median valuation [20].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Dow Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its financial condition and ability to manage macroeconomic challenges during the specified Class Period from January 30, 2025, to July 23, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased Dow securities during the Class Period, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for October 28, 2025 [1][4]. - The complaint alleges that Dow overstated its ability to mitigate macroeconomic and tariff-related headwinds, which negatively impacted its business and financial condition [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Dow - The allegations include that Dow failed to disclose the true scope and severity of competitive and pricing pressures, softening global sales, and an oversupply of products in its markets [3]. - It is claimed that the public statements made by Dow were materially false and misleading throughout the Class Period [3]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Investors may seek to be appointed as lead plaintiff representatives through Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP or choose to remain absent class members [4]. - The lead plaintiff will act on behalf of all class members and select counsel to represent the class in the litigation [4].