Core Insights - Dow and Gruppo Fiori have developed a new method for recycling automotive polyurethane foam, which allows for the extraction of clean foam ready for chemical recycling without the need for vehicle disassembly [1][2]. Group 1: Recycling Process - A typical car contains approximately 62 pounds of polyurethane foam, with 22 to 33 pounds found in car seats [2]. - The new process eliminates the costly and labor-intensive disassembly step previously required for foam recovery, enabling workers to convert recycled foam into new materials [2]. Group 2: Circular Supply Chain - The advancement supports a "circular automotive supply chain," promoting continuous material use and waste minimization [3]. - Collaboration is emphasized as essential for building a closed-loop supply chain in the automotive industry [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Compliance and Sustainability - The partnership aims to assist manufacturers in meeting proposed European Union regulations that require higher recycled material content in vehicles [4]. - Sustainable recycling pathways will help automotive manufacturers achieve their sustainability goals without compromising the performance benefits of polyurethanes [5].

Group 1 - A class action was filed on behalf of individuals and entities that purchased or acquired Dow Inc. securities [1] - The relevant period for the class action is from January 30, 2025, to July 23, 2025 [1] - The action is being reminded to stockholders by Robbins LLP [1]

Core Insights - Dow Chemical is considering delaying the restart of its Path2Zero integrated polyethylene project in Canada by 1 to 2 years [1] - The CEO emphasized that the timing of project launch is crucial for maximizing returns, and the current market conditions are not favorable for starting the project [1] - The project was initially planned for phase one production by the end of 2027 and phase two by 2029 [1] Industry Context - The petrochemical market has entered a downturn since Dow made its final investment decision for the Path2Zero project at the end of 2023 [1] - The announcement of import tariffs by the U.S. on nearly all countries has further extended the market's low period, leading economists to lower growth forecasts [1] - Despite the delay, the project remains a viable investment due to Canada's abundant low-cost ethane resources, providing a significant cost advantage for ethylene producers [2] - The project's location in Alberta will utilize existing infrastructure, which can enhance investment returns [2]

Accessibility StatementSkip Navigation SAN DIEGO, Sept. 17, 2025 /PRNewswire/ --Â Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Dow Inc. (NYSE: DOW) securities between January 30, 2025 and July 23, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), have until Tuesday, October 28, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Dow class action lawsuit. Captioned Sarti v. Dow Inc., No. 25-cv-12744 (E.D. Mich.), the Dow class action lawsuit charges Dow, The Dow Chemical Company, a ...

Group 1 - The Dow Jones 30 is currently flat as traders await the FOMC interest rate decision, with expectations for three interest rate cuts by year-end [1] - The S&P 500 is experiencing choppy trading, with market reactions anticipated based on the Federal Reserve's rate decisions [3] - A significant support level for the S&P 500 is identified at 6500, with expectations for a potential V pattern recovery after any downward movement [4] Group 2 - The market is sensitive to the tone of the FOMC statement, which could influence trader sentiment and market direction [1][3] - A breakdown below the rising wedge pattern could lead to a test of the 45,000 level, a psychologically significant figure [2] - The overall market sentiment remains bullish, despite the anticipated volatility in the hours following the FOMC meeting [4]

About this content About Oliver Haill Oliver has been writing about companies and markets since the early 2000s, cutting his teeth as a financial journalist at Growth Company Investor with a focusing on AIM companies and small caps, before a few years later becoming a section editor and then head of research. He joined Proactive after a couple of years freelancing, where he worked for the Financial Times Group, ITV, Press Association, Reuters sports desk, the London Olympic News Service, Rugby World Cup ...

Group 1 - The European chemical and petrochemical industry is facing a "multiple crisis" due to weak domestic demand and significant new capacities being built overseas [1] - The market is shrinking as a result of a large influx of imported products, with only a 4% reduction in ethylene capacity announced, which is insufficient to address the underlying issues [1] - Consumer demand recovery is crucial, as purchasing behavior has changed, necessitating the industry to adapt quickly and improve production agility and efficiency [1] Group 2 - EU policymakers need to take decisive action, as current legislation, particularly the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and the European Green Deal, does not adequately support the chemical industry [1] - The existing CBAM mechanism is not suitable for complex value chains like polymers, contradicting its original intent [1] - The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is seen as promoting deindustrialization rather than decarbonization, and without foundational support for decarbonization, it becomes merely a cost burden [1] Group 3 - The U.S. government demonstrates greater synergy with the industry regarding regulatory goals compared to the EU, which needs to reach consensus on "goal setting" and "implementation pathways" [2] - China is noted to be ahead of Europe in certain sustainable development areas, particularly in electrification and having a surplus of green energy, indicating that Europe needs to scale up its decarbonization efforts [2]

Core Viewpoint - The global chemical industry is experiencing a general revenue decline among leading companies, although the rate of decline has narrowed compared to the previous year, indicating a persistent long-cycle downturn in the industry [2][4]. Group 1: Revenue Trends - In 2024, the revenue of leading companies in the global chemical industry is generally declining, with a median revenue decrease of 1% and a median sales figure dropping to approximately $8.81 billion [5]. - The number of companies reporting revenue declines is significant, with 53 out of 106 companies experiencing a decrease, while only 40 companies reported growth [5]. - The largest revenue changes include a notable drop in rankings for companies like DuPont, which fell to 36th place, and a significant decline in lithium companies due to long-term price weakness [3][4]. Group 2: Industry Adjustments - Major companies are actively adjusting their operations to improve profitability, with BASF planning to sell its decorative coatings business and considering a spin-off of its agricultural solutions business [4]. - The chemical industry is in its third consecutive year of low performance, with European regions facing the highest costs and a 20% drop in demand compared to pre-pandemic levels [4]. - Companies like Dow and LyondellBasell have announced plans to reduce capital expenditures by 2025, reflecting a strategic shift in response to ongoing market challenges [5]. Group 3: Profitability Indicators - Despite the revenue decline, the chemical industry shows signs of profitability recovery, with a median operating profit increase of 4% in 2024 [5]. - Cost-cutting measures, such as BASF's plan to save €1 billion in 2024, are being implemented to navigate the challenging environment [5]. - The stability in capital expenditure and R&D investment ratios indicates a cautious but consistent approach to maintaining operational capabilities [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Dow Inc. alleging securities fraud that affected investors between January 30, 2025, and July 23, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Dow Inc. overstated its ability to manage macroeconomic and tariff-related challenges, as well as its financial flexibility to support dividends [2]. - It is alleged that the negative impacts of competitive pressures, declining global sales, and product oversupply on Dow's business were understated [2]. - The public statements made by the defendants are claimed to be materially false and misleading throughout the relevant period [2]. Group 2: Legal Process - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until October 28, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing significant settlements for shareholders and is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. [4]. - The firm has over 70 employees dedicated to serving clients in complex securities litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - Investors with substantial losses in Dow Inc. have the opportunity to lead a securities fraud class action lawsuit against the company, alleging that Dow misrepresented its financial stability and the impact of macroeconomic challenges on its business [1][3]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that from January 30, 2025, to July 23, 2025, Dow failed to disclose critical information regarding its financial health, particularly its ability to manage macroeconomic and tariff-related challenges [3]. - Allegations include that Dow overstated its financial flexibility to support dividends and understated the negative impacts of competitive pressures, declining global sales, and product oversupply on its business [3]. Investor Participation - Investors who suffered losses are encouraged to contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith before October 28, 2025, to participate in the ongoing lawsuit [2][4]. - Participation does not require immediate action; investors may choose to retain counsel or remain absent from the class action [5].