Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) by Berger Montague on behalf of investors who acquired shares between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, alleging that the company misled investors regarding its financial guidance and undisclosed risks associated with major infrastructure projects [1][3]. Company Overview - Fluor Corporation, headquartered in Irving, Texas, provides engineering, procurement, construction, and project management services globally. Its Urban Solutions segment is the largest revenue contributor among its three segments [2]. Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Fluor and certain executives failed to disclose rising costs related to significant projects, including the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, which were impacted by subcontractor design errors, material price increases, and scheduling delays. Additionally, the company allegedly downplayed the adverse effects of reduced client capital spending and broader economic uncertainties [3]. Financial Guidance - In February 2025, Fluor projected an adjusted EPS for the full year 2025 in the range of $2.25 to $2.75 and EBITDA between $575 million and $675 million, which was reaffirmed in May 2025 [4]. Recent Performance - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported disappointing second-quarter results, with non-GAAP EPS of $0.43, missing consensus estimates by 23%, and revenue of $3.98 billion, falling short by $570 million and down 5.9% year-over-year. The company significantly lowered its FY 2025 outlook, attributing the decline to project delays and reduced client awards. CEO James R. Breuer confirmed that the aforementioned projects were responsible for the poor performance. Following this announcement, Fluor's stock price dropped by $15.35, or 27.04%, closing at $41.42 [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Fluor securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [2] - The lead plaintiff must file a motion with the Court by November 14, 2025, to represent other class members [2] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time and has been ranked highly for its performance in this area [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance, which were impacted by subcontractor errors, price increases, and economic uncertainty [4] - It is claimed that these misstatements led to a significant negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results, resulting in investor damages when the truth was revealed [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial prospects during the specified class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [3][7]. Allegation Details - The complaint claims that Fluor's management failed to disclose significant cost increases related to major projects, including the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, were likely to have a substantial negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results [3]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is described as unreliable and unrealistic, with an overstated effectiveness of the company's risk mitigation strategies and an understated impact of economic uncertainty [3]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased Fluor shares and experienced losses are encouraged to contact the law firm Bragar Eagel & Squire for more information regarding their rights and potential claims [4][7]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is November 14, 2025 [7]. About the Law Firm - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individual and institutional investors in complex litigation across various courts in the United States [5].

Group 1 - Fluor (FLR) shares experienced a significant increase after activist investor Starboard Value acquired a nearly 5% stake in the company, indicating plans to enhance its stock performance [1] - The information regarding Starboard's investment and intentions was reported by The Wall Street Journal and detailed on Starboard's website [1] Group 2 - The broader market context includes rising prices for gold and silver, alongside a sell-off in bank stocks, indicating a volatile market environment [1]

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action securities lawsuit due to alleged securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - The lawsuit claims that Fluor Corporation concealed rising costs associated with infrastructure projects, including Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [2]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, significantly affected the Company's business and financial results [2]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is claimed to be unreliable and overstated regarding the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategy and the impact of economic uncertainty [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until November 14, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, indicating no financial obligation to participate in the lawsuit [3]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions for shareholders over the past 20 years and consistently ranking among the top securities litigation firms in the U.S. [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation, alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [1][2] Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Fluor Corporation made false statements regarding the costs associated with its infrastructure projects, which were increasing due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [2] - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, were likely to have a significant negative impact on the Company's business and financial results [2] - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is claimed to be unreliable and overstated regarding the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategies and the impact of economic uncertainty [2] Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until November 14, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [3] - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, and participation does not require serving as a lead plaintiff [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years [4] - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4]

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) is facing allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its financial performance and project costs during the class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. Allegations - The complaint claims that Fluor's costs for infrastructure projects, including Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, were increasing due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [1]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and hesitance due to economic uncertainty, were significantly impacting Fluor's business and financial results [1]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is described as unreliable and unrealistic, with an overstated effectiveness of the company's risk mitigation strategy and an understated impact of economic uncertainty [1]. - Consequently, the public statements made by Fluor were deemed materially false and misleading throughout the relevant period [1]. Next Steps for Shareholders - Shareholders who purchased FLR shares during the specified timeframe are encouraged to register for the class action, with a deadline set for November 14, 2025 [2]. - Upon registration, shareholders will be enrolled in a portfolio monitoring system to receive updates on the case [2].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Fluor securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by the deadline [2] - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding the costs associated with several major projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and various Texas highways [4] - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced customer capital spending and economic uncertainty, negatively impacted Fluor's business and financial results [4] - The lawsuit asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for 2025 was unreliable, and the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategies was overstated [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Fluor securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The lead plaintiff must file a motion with the Court by November 14, 2025, to represent other class members in the litigation [3]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance, which were impacted by subcontractor errors, price increases, and economic uncertainty [5]. - It is claimed that these misstatements led to significant negative impacts on Fluor's business and financial results, resulting in damages for investors when the true information became public [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation, alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations of Fraud - The lawsuit claims that Fluor Corporation made false statements regarding the rising costs of its infrastructure projects, including Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [2]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending by customers and client hesitance due to economic uncertainty, significantly affected the Company's business and financial results [2]. - The complaint asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for FY 2025 was unreliable, overstating the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategy and understating the impact of economic uncertainty [2]. Group 2: Legal Process and Participation - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until November 14, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require serving as a lead plaintiff [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, indicating no financial obligation to participate in the lawsuit [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years [4]. - The firm has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years, highlighting its expertise in complex securities cases [4].