Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial prospects during the Class Period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [3][7]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that Fluor's management failed to disclose significant cost increases related to major projects, including the Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35 projects, due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, were likely to have a substantial negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results [3]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is described as unreliable and unrealistic, with an overstated effectiveness of the company's risk mitigation strategies [3]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased Fluor shares and experienced losses are encouraged to contact the law firm Bragar Eagel & Squire for more information regarding their rights and potential claims [4][7]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is November 14, 2025 [7]. About the Law Firm - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individual and institutional investors in complex litigation across various courts in the United States [5].

RADNOR, Pa., Sept. 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The law firm of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (www.ktmc.com) informs investors that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation (“Fluor”) (NYSE: FLR) on behalf of those who purchased or otherwise acquired Fluor securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). The lead plaintiff deadline is November 14, 2025. CONTACT KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP: If you suffered Fluor losses, you ...

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR) is facing allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its financial performance and project costs during the class period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [3]. Group 1: Allegations and Impact - The complaint alleges that costs associated with Fluor's infrastructure projects, including Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, were increasing due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is claimed that these issues, along with a reduction in customer capital spending and client hesitance due to economic uncertainty, were likely to have a significant negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results [3]. - The financial guidance provided by Fluor for FY 2025 is described as unreliable and unrealistic, with an overstated effectiveness of the company's risk mitigation strategy and an understated impact of economic uncertainty [3]. Group 2: Class Action Details - Shareholders who purchased FLR shares during the specified class period are encouraged to register for the class action, with a deadline set for November 14, 2025 [4]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [4]. - There is no cost or obligation for shareholders to participate in this case [4]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of investors affected by deceit, fraud, and illegal business practices [5]. - The firm aims to ensure that companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements or omissions that inflated stock prices [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025, for a class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Fluor securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by the November 14, 2025 deadline [2]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3]. - The firm achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements since 2013 [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor Corporation made false and misleading statements regarding the financial impact of various projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and Texas highway projects, due to rising costs from subcontractor errors and economic uncertainty [4]. - It is claimed that these misstatements led to an unreliable financial outlook for 2025 and that the company's risk mitigation strategies were overstated [4].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation for alleged misleading statements and undisclosed costs related to specific projects, impacting the company's financial guidance and business outlook [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations Against Fluor Corporation - The lawsuit claims that Fluor's management made false or misleading statements regarding the costs associated with the Gordie Howe International Bridge and highway projects in Texas, which were increasing due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [2]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, were likely to have a significant negative impact on Fluor's business and financial results [2]. - The complaint asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 was unreliable, overstating the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategy and understating the impact of economic uncertainty on its operations [2]. Group 2: Lead Plaintiff Process - Investors in Fluor have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff representative in the class action, which involves directing the litigation on behalf of all class members [3]. - The lead plaintiff is typically the investor or group of investors with the largest financial interest in the case and must be adequate and typical of the proposed class [3]. - Participation as a lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery from the lawsuit [3].

Do you, or did you, own shares of Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR)?Did you purchase your shares between February 18, 2025 and July 31, 2025, inclusive?Did you lose money in your investment in Fluor Corporation?Do you want to discuss your rights? NEW YORK, Sept. 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationally acclaimed investor rights law firm, reminds Fluor Corporation (“Fluor” or the “Company”) (NYSE: FLR) investors of an upcoming deadline involving a securities fraud class action lawsuit co ...

Accessibility StatementSkip Navigation NEW YORK, Sept. 29, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of Fluor Corporation (NYSE: FLR). Shareholders who purchased shares of FLR during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointment. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery. CONTACT US HERE:https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/fluor-corporation-loss-submission-form/? id=16961 ...

Core Viewpoint - Fluor Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance during the specified class period [1][3]. Summary by Sections Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Maglione v. Fluor Corporation, No. 25-cv-02496 (N.D. Tex.), and it involves purchasers of Fluor securities from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1]. - Interested parties have until November 14, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. Allegations Against Fluor - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor failed to disclose increasing costs related to key infrastructure projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and the I-635/LBJ and I-35 highways, due to subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is claimed that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, negatively impacted Fluor's business and financial results [3]. - The lawsuit asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 was unrealistic and that the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategies was overstated [3]. Financial Performance - On August 1, 2025, Fluor reported second quarter 2025 non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.43, missing consensus estimates by $0.13, and revenue of $3.98 billion, which represented a 5.9% year-over-year decline and fell short of estimates by $570 million [4]. - The disappointing results were attributed to rising costs in infrastructure projects and reduced capital spending by clients, leading to a negatively revised financial outlook for fiscal year 2025 [4]. - Following the announcement of these results, Fluor's stock price dropped by over 27% [4]. Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Fluor securities during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [5]. - The lead plaintiff will represent the interests of all class members and can select a law firm of their choice for litigation [5]. About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a prominent law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [6]. - The firm has a strong track record in obtaining significant recoveries in securities class action cases, including the largest recovery in history of $7.2 billion in the Enron case [6].

Group 1: Growth Stocks Overview - Growth stocks can be diverse, with companies like Cintas and Sherwin-Williams showing average annual gains of over 25% and nearly 20% respectively over the past 15 years [1][2] - Despite the potential for overvaluation, there are still undervalued growth stocks worth considering [2] Group 2: Fluor Corporation - Fluor Corporation is a $7 billion diversified construction and engineering company with an average annual gain of 35% over the past five years, though only 1% over the past decade [4] - The stock is currently down 14% year-to-date, presenting a potential buying opportunity, with a forward-looking P/E ratio of nearly 18, close to its five-year average [4][6] - Fluor has a significant backlog of orders valued at $28.2 billion and holds a majority stake in the nuclear startup NuScale Power, which may benefit from the growing use of nuclear power in AI data centers [6] Group 3: Opendoor Technologies - Opendoor Technologies has shown an average annual gain of 42% over the past three years and is up 320% over the past year [7][9] - The company operates an online platform for buying and selling homes and has a price-to-sales ratio of just 1.1, suggesting it may not be overvalued [8][9] - A potential tailwind for Opendoor is the decline in interest rates, while a headwind could be the sluggish real estate market affecting its profitability [9][10] Group 4: Amazon - Amazon is a well-known growth stock with a forward P/E ratio of 28, significantly below its five-year average of 46, indicating it may be attractively priced [11] - The company is not only the largest online marketplace but also a major player in cloud computing through Amazon Web Services [11] - Amazon continues to grow and explore new avenues, including grocery deliveries, despite concerns about its growth rate relative to investments in AI [12] Group 5: Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF - The Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF has averaged annual gains of nearly 20% over the past 15 years and 32% over the past three years [13] - The ETF includes 68 stocks in sectors such as semiconductor equipment and internet services, with top holdings including Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, and Broadcom [13][14] - It features a low expense ratio of 0.08%, making it an attractive option for investors looking to own a diversified portfolio of growth stocks without the burden of selecting individual stocks [14]

I started examining pharmaceutical construction companies some weeks back, when President Donald Trump was threatening pharma manufacturing companies with tariffs unless they began building up production capabilities within the United States. After all, if new production facilities areMarkets rise and fall, booms come and go, and the world keeps ticking. Ultimately, I believe observing megatrends, as difficult as they can be to spot, let alone fully comprehend, can yield insights into the advance of human s ...