Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fortinet, Inc. for alleged misrepresentations regarding its product refresh cycle and the true number of FortiGate firewalls eligible for upgrades, leading to significant investor losses [7]. Allegation Details - The lawsuit claims that Fortinet's management misrepresented the potential profitability of the refresh cycle, stating it would not be as lucrative as suggested due to the age and limited scope of the products involved [7]. - It is alleged that Fortinet concealed the uncertainty regarding the number of FortiGates that required upgrades and misled investors about the momentum of the refresh cycle [7]. - Following the earnings call on August 6, 2025, where Fortinet disclosed that it was only 40% to 50% through the upgrade cycle, the stock price dropped over 22% [7]. Next Steps - Investors who purchased Fortinet shares during the specified class period (November 8, 2024, to August 6, 2025) and suffered losses are encouraged to contact the law firm for more information and to discuss their legal rights [4]. - The deadline for investors to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is November 21, 2025 [7]. About the Law Firm - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm that represents individual and institutional investors in complex litigation across various courts in the United States [5].

Core Viewpoint - Class action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of shareholders of several publicly-traded companies, with specific deadlines for filing lead plaintiff motions [1] Group 1: Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ: FTNT) - Class period is from November 8, 2024, to August 6, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of November 21, 2025 [2] - Allegations include false and misleading statements regarding the refresh cycle's profitability, lack of clarity on upgradeable FortiGate firewalls, and misrepresentation of the refresh momentum [2] Group 2: Molina Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE: MOH) - Class period is from February 5, 2025, to July 23, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of December 2, 2025 [3] - Allegations include failure to disclose adverse facts about medical cost trend assumptions, dependency on low utilization of services for growth, and likely cuts to financial guidance for fiscal year 2025 [3] Group 3: Marex Group plc (NASDAQ: MRX) - Class period is from May 16, 2024, to August 5, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of December 8, 2025 [4] - Allegations include selling over-the-counter financial instruments to itself, inconsistencies in financial statements, and unreliability of Marex's financial disclosures [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fortinet, Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between November 8, 2024, and August 6, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Fortinet's management made false statements regarding the refresh cycle of their products, suggesting it would be more profitable than it actually was [2]. - It is alleged that the refresh cycle consisted of old products that represented only a "small percentage" of Fortinet's overall business [2]. - The complaint also states that Fortinet misrepresented the number of FortiGate firewalls available for upgrade and that the refresh momentum was overstated, with only half of the refresh completed by the end of Q2 2025 [2]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until November 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [3]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years [4]. - The firm has been recognized in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report for seven consecutive years as one of the leading securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Fortinet, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and product refresh cycle during the class period from November 8, 2024, to August 6, 2025 [1][2]. Allegations Against Fortinet - The lawsuit claims that Fortinet misrepresented the profitability of its product refresh cycle, stating it would be more lucrative than it actually was, as it involved older products that constituted a "small percentage" of the company's business [2]. - It is alleged that Fortinet did not have a clear understanding of the actual number of FortiGate firewalls eligible for upgrades, which misled investors about the company's operational capabilities [2]. - The company reportedly misled investors by claiming that the refresh would gain momentum over two years, while in reality, it pushed through about half of the refresh in just a few months by the end of the second quarter of 2025 [2]. - As a result of these actions, the statements made by Fortinet regarding its business, operations, and future prospects were deemed materially false and misleading [2]. Lead Plaintiff Process - Investors in Fortinet have until November 21, 2025, to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff representative in the class action lawsuit, which involves directing the litigation on behalf of all class members [3]. - The lead plaintiff is typically the investor or group of investors with the largest financial interest in the case and is responsible for selecting legal counsel to represent the class [3]. Firm Background - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP is known for prosecuting class actions and has a reputation for recovering billions for victims of corporate misconduct [4].

Core Insights - Range Financial Group LLC has fully exited its position in Fortinet, liquidating 29,944 shares for an estimated $3.2 million, which previously accounted for 1.2% of the fund's assets under management (AUM) [1][2]. Company Overview - Fortinet, Inc. is a global provider of integrated cybersecurity solutions, offering a broad product portfolio and scalable security infrastructure [4]. - The company serves a diverse customer base across various sectors, including telecommunications, technology, government, financial services, education, retail, manufacturing, and healthcare [4]. - Fortinet generates revenue primarily through hardware and software sales, security subscriptions, technical support, and professional services [5]. Financial Performance - As of October 17, 2025, Fortinet's market capitalization is $63.94 billion, with a trailing twelve months (TTM) revenue of $6.34 billion and a net income of $1.94 billion [3]. - The company's share price closed at $83.44 on October 17, 2025, reflecting a 3.2% increase over the past year, although it underperformed the S&P 500's total return by 12.4 percentage points [2]. Recent Developments - Fortinet reported a 14% revenue increase to over $1.6 billion, exceeding management's quarterly guidance, and adjusted diluted earnings per share of $0.64, which also surpassed budgeted figures [8]. - Despite the positive revenue growth, concerns arose regarding the completion of 40% to 50% of its planned firewall upgrade cycle, leading to fears of limited future revenue growth as many customers may have already upgraded [9]. - Following the second-quarter earnings release on August 6, 2025, Fortinet's share price dropped nearly 22% the next day, prompting several analysts to downgrade their ratings [7][9].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Fortinet, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and product refresh cycle during the specified Class Period from November 8, 2024, to August 6, 2025 [1][2]. Allegations Against Fortinet - The lawsuit claims that Fortinet misrepresented the profitability of its product refresh cycle, stating it would be more lucrative than it actually was, as it involved older products that constituted a "small percentage" of the company's business [2]. - It is alleged that Fortinet did not have a clear understanding of the actual number of FortiGate firewalls eligible for upgrades, which misled investors about the company's operational capabilities [2]. - The complaint asserts that Fortinet falsely indicated that the product refresh would gain momentum over two years, while in reality, the company had pushed through about half of the refresh in just a few months by the end of the second quarter of 2025 [2]. - As a result of these actions, the statements made by Fortinet regarding its business, operations, and future prospects were materially false and misleading [2]. Lead Plaintiff Process - Investors in Fortinet have until November 21, 2025, to apply to be appointed as lead plaintiffs in the class action, representing the interests of all class members [3]. - The lead plaintiff is typically the investor or group of investors with the largest financial stake in the case and is responsible for directing the litigation [3]. Firm Background - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP is known for prosecuting class actions and has a reputation for recovering billions for victims of corporate misconduct [4].

Core Insights - Artificial intelligence (AI) is identified as the greatest investment opportunity of the current era, with a strong emphasis on the urgent need for energy to support its growth [1][2][3] Industry Overview - Wall Street is investing hundreds of billions into AI technologies, but there is a critical question regarding the energy supply needed to sustain this growth [2] - AI technologies, particularly data centers for large language models, consume vast amounts of electricity, comparable to the energy needs of small cities [2] - The energy demands of AI are expected to increase, leading to potential strain on power grids and rising electricity prices [2] Company Insights - A specific company is highlighted as a key player in the AI energy sector, owning critical energy infrastructure assets that are essential for meeting the anticipated energy spike from AI [3][6] - This company is not a chipmaker or cloud platform but is positioned to benefit significantly from the increasing demand for electricity driven by AI [3][6] - The company is involved in U.S. LNG exportation and is well-positioned to capitalize on the onshoring trend driven by tariffs [5][7] Financial Position - The company is noted for being debt-free and holding a substantial cash reserve, which is nearly one-third of its market capitalization [8] - It trades at a low valuation of less than 7 times earnings, making it an attractive investment opportunity compared to other energy and utility firms [10] Market Trends - The company is poised to benefit from the AI infrastructure supercycle, the onshoring boom, and a surge in U.S. LNG exports [14] - There is a growing recognition among investors of the company's potential, as it quietly rides multiple favorable market trends without the high valuations typical of the sector [8][10]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fortinet, Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between November 8, 2024, and August 6, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Fortinet's management made false statements regarding the refresh cycle of their products, suggesting it would be more profitable than it actually was, as it involved old products that represented a "small percentage" of the company's business [2]. - It is alleged that Fortinet misrepresented the number of FortiGate firewalls eligible for upgrades and that the refresh momentum was overstated, with approximately half of the refresh completed in just a few months by the end of Q2 2025 [2]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until November 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require serving as a lead plaintiff [3]. - Class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs or fees, and there is no obligation to participate [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years and consistently ranking among the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Points - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fortinet, Inc. for alleged securities fraud affecting investors between November 8, 2024, and August 6, 2025 [1] - The lawsuit claims that Fortinet misrepresented the potential profitability of its product refresh cycle and concealed the true number of FortiGate firewalls eligible for upgrades [2] - Investors have until November 21, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff, with no out-of-pocket costs for class members [3] Company Details - Fortinet, Inc. is facing allegations of securities fraud related to misleading statements about its product refresh cycle and the performance of its FortiGate firewalls [2] - The lawsuit highlights that the refresh cycle consisted of older products that represented a "small percentage" of the company's business, contradicting the company's claims [2] Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a strong track record in securities litigation, having secured hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders over the past 20 years [4] - The firm has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [4]

Core Viewpoint - Fortinet, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company misled investors regarding its product upgrade cycle and revenue expectations [1][3]. Company Overview - Fortinet is described as a leader in cybersecurity, providing a range of hardware and software products, with its flagship product being the FortiGate firewall [2]. Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit alleges that Fortinet failed to disclose critical information about the forced upgrade cycle of its FortiGate firewalls, including: - The number of units subject to the upgrade was smaller and included more low-end units than represented [3]. - The age and cost of certain devices in the upgrade cohort would not significantly impact current revenues [3]. - Fortinet lacked necessary data on end users to assess the impact of the end-of-service event in 2026 [3]. - The 2026 forced upgrade cycle had progressed significantly during the second half of 2024 and the first half of 2025 [3]. - Without customer upgrades, Fortinet's reported product sales would have been flat or negative [3]. - The 2026 forced upgrade cycle would not be a meaningful growth driver for the second half of 2025 and 2026 [3]. Impact of the Allegations - On August 6, 2025, Fortinet disclosed that the 2026 forced upgrade cycle was already 40%-50% complete as of June 30, 2025, contradicting prior investor expectations [4]. - Following this revelation, Fortinet's stock price fell by more than 22% [4]. Legal Process - Investors who purchased Fortinet common stock during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, which allows them to act on behalf of other class members [6]. Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is representing the plaintiffs and has a strong track record in prosecuting investor class actions, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7][8].