Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Charter Communications securities between July 26, 2024, and July 24, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on October 13, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1][3]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Charter Communications securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting the law firm [3][6]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Charter Communications made false or misleading statements regarding the impact of the FCC's Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ending, which affected Internet customer declines and revenue [5]. - It is claimed that Charter failed to manage the consequences of the ACP ending and did not execute operations effectively to mitigate its impact [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that Charter's optimistic statements about its business operations and earnings growth lacked a reasonable basis, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors of KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc. about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit related to the company's October 2024 IPO [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased KinderCare common stock may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by October 14, 2025 [3]. - The lawsuit claims that the registration statement was false and/or misleading, failing to disclose incidents of child abuse and neglect at KinderCare facilities, and that the company did not meet minimum care standards [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].

NEW YORK, Sept. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces it has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: RICK) between December 15, 2021 and September 16, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than November 20, 2025 in the securities class action first file ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Snap Inc. securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on October 20, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Snap securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by October 20, 2025 [3]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Case Background - The lawsuit alleges that Snap's management misled investors by presenting an overly optimistic view of the company's advertising revenue and growth potential while downplaying significant execution errors [5]. - The lawsuit claims that when the true situation regarding Snap's performance became known, investors suffered damages due to the misleading information provided during the Class Period [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of KBR, Inc. securities purchasers during the specified Class Period, alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and prospects [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit pertains to KBR, Inc. securities purchased between May 6, 2025, and June 19, 2025 [1]. - The lawsuit claims that KBR's management misrepresented the status of its partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense's Transportation Command, despite known concerns about HomeSafe's ability to fulfill contractual obligations [5]. - Investors are encouraged to join the class action without incurring out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Interested investors can join the KBR class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must file a motion with the court by November 18, 2025, to represent other class members in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including over $438 million for investors in 2019 [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements and has consistently ranked among the top firms in this area since 2013 [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Dow Inc. securities between January 30, 2025, and July 23, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on October 28, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Dow securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by October 28, 2025 [3]. - The lawsuit claims that Dow made false and misleading statements regarding its ability to manage macroeconomic and tariff-related challenges, overstating its financial flexibility and understating the negative impacts on its business [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased LifeMD, Inc. securities between May 7, 2025, and August 5, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a securities class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought LifeMD securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by October 27, 2025 [3]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding LifeMD's competitive position and failed to account for rising customer acquisition costs in their 2025 guidance [5]. - It is claimed that the defendants' statements about LifeMD's business operations and prospects were materially false and misleading, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [5].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation for misleading statements regarding its financial performance and project costs during the Class Period from February 18, 2025, to July 31, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Fluor made false and misleading statements about the costs associated with several major projects, including the Gordie Howe International Bridge and various Texas highways, due to subcontractor errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [5]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced customer capital spending and economic uncertainty, negatively impacted Fluor's business and financial results [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for 2025 was unreliable and that the company's risk mitigation strategies were overstated [5]. Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who purchased Fluor securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - Interested investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by November 14, 2025, to represent the class in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who purchased Savara Inc. securities between March 7, 2024, and May 23, 2025, alleging misleading statements regarding the company's drug application process [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Savara made false statements about the MOLBREEVI Biologics License Application (BLA), indicating it lacked sufficient information for FDA approval [5]. - It is alleged that the FDA was unlikely to approve the MOLBREEVI BLA in its current form, which could delay Savara's submission timeline and increase the need for additional capital [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that these misleading statements caused investors to suffer damages when the true information became public [5]. Group 2: Class Action Participation - Investors who purchased Savara securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without upfront fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, investors can submit a form online or contact the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by November 7, 2025, to represent the interests of the class members [1][3]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest against a Chinese company at the time [4]. - The firm has consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in handling such cases [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fly-E Group, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The Class Period for the Fly-E Group, Inc. securities is from July 15, 2025, to August 14, 2025, inclusive [1]. - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by November 10, 2025 [2]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time [3]. - The firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013 [3]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering significant amounts for clients [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Fly-E Group provided misleading statements regarding the safety of its lithium battery, which negatively impacted E-vehicle sales revenue [4]. - Despite optimistic long-term projections, Fly-E's sales continued to decline, and operating expenses increased, leading to a failure in meeting revenue forecasts [4]. - The lawsuit claims that when the true details were revealed, investors suffered damages due to the misleading information [4].