v e r s i o n l a u n c h OECD Economic Surveys: Finland 2025 May 2025 Volume 2025/11 OECD Economic Surveys: Finland 2025 Volume 2025/11 May 2025 OECD Economic Surveys: Finland 2025 v e r s i o n l a u n c h This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under th ...

Development Centre Studies Development Centre Studies Development Centre Studies Start‑up Asia Chasing the Innovation Frontier Start‑up Asia Chasing the Innovation Frontier Start‑up Asia CHASING THE INNOVATION FRONTIER This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Member countries of the OECD or its Development Centre. Note by all the European Union Member States ...

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development DAF/COMP/LACCF(2024)33 Unclassified English - Or. English 18 September 2024 DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE Cancels & replaces the same document of 18 September 2024 Latin American and Caribbean Competition Forum LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN COMPETITION FORUM Session III: Detecting cartels for ex officio investigations Background Note by the Secretariat 9-10 October 2024 This document was prepared by the OECD Secre ...

像这个航天科技航天科工集团专门召开了2025年的工作会议1月2号根据航天科技航天科工的公众号 哈林科技指出2025年的工作任务重难度高一场大将任务考核转化为确保任务圆满完成的内生动力要确保稳重静好包括科工集团也明确提到在前面部署2025年的航天防务工作全力夺取2025年型号任务的全面胜利确保十四五规划任务的收官从工科技明确的2025年的型号工作会议来看2025年是十四五的收官之年 我们认为各个领域相关装备需求的计划是有望逐渐明确的是有望逐渐形成自上而下而上的景气过道预期的所以我们一直给大家汇报短期股票涨和跌原因比较复杂和比较多从板块本身大家要重视板块的配置价值 我们还是强调是景气扩张或景气向上我们不是很强调周期盘算这个逻辑另外的话就是我们今年大家熟悉我们的领导都知道我们今年给大家讲可以从PB、ROE视角上去理解这个军阀化的现场弹性PB的话是代表了固执的上衔但背后的话我们核心还是强调ROE本身我们也给大家去对比过东方国内环境系 都是我们这个行业里非常优秀的公司比如说大家会去讨论为什么光电的PB多半是比电器要高一些的其实大家去猜猜看的话光电大部分时间的ROE也是比电器的ROE稍微高一些的当两个企业的ROE回归的时 ...

Financial Consumer Protection in Ireland A REVIEW OF THE CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND'S SUPERVISORY FUNCTIONS A REVIEW OF THE CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND'S SUPERVISORY FUNCTIONS This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. ISBN 978-92-64-92405-5 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-42072-4 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-64-72422-8 (HTML) Corrigend ...

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the insurance industry. Core Insights - The insurance industry is unevenly developed globally, with lower coverage in less advanced economies [28][29] - Non-life insurance premiums grew by 12.4% on average in nominal terms in 2023, with a real growth rate of 6.2%, indicating a recovery in demand post-COVID-19 [23][76] - Life insurance premiums showed stable growth overall, but some jurisdictions experienced declines due to higher interest rates affecting consumer behavior [25][33] - Investment performance for insurers improved significantly in 2023, reversing previous negative trends, with two-thirds of jurisdictions reporting positive real investment returns [26][32] - Insurer profitability broadly improved in 2023, with positive underwriting performance and investment gains contributing to increased shareholder equity [27][33] Summary by Sections 1. Global Insurance Market Overview - The penetration of the insurance industry varies widely, with higher levels in advanced economies where premiums can exceed 10% of GDP [22][37] - The non-life sector dominates the insurance industry, accounting for 55% of total premiums written in 2023 [40] - Life insurance is more prominent in regions with higher per capita income, with advanced economies showing a higher share of life premiums [56][57] 2. Non-Life Sector Performance - Non-life premiums grew across all reporting jurisdictions, driven by increased claims costs and higher policy rates [23][72] - The nominal growth of non-life premiums was visible in major classes such as motor vehicle, fire, and health insurance [72][80] - Insurers faced higher claims costs, with gross claims payments increasing by around 17% in nominal terms in 2023 [88][94] 3. Life Sector Performance - Life sector premium growth remained stable overall, with some jurisdictions experiencing declines due to higher interest rates impacting consumer choices [25][26] - The demand for annuity products increased in a higher interest rate environment, while some customers surrendered policies for alternative investments [24][25] 4. Investment Performance - Insurers achieved positive investment returns in real terms in about two-thirds of reporting jurisdictions, contrasting with negative returns in 2022 [32] - Developments in financial markets, including falling government bond yields and strong equity market performance, contributed to improved investment outcomes [26][32] 5. Profitability Trends - Insurer profitability improved in 2023, reversing previous negative performance, with gains in shareholder equity noted across many jurisdictions [27][33] - The implementation of new accounting standards (IFRS 17) in several jurisdictions impacted recorded liabilities and equity [33]

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the Digital Economy sector Core Insights - The report outlines a roadmap for measuring the Digital Economy, emphasizing the need for a common definition and a set of indicators to assess jobs, skills, and growth in this sector [21][47] - It highlights the critical role of digital technologies in transforming economies and the importance of measuring their impact on employment and productivity [21][22] - The report identifies major trends in the Digital Economy, including the increasing reliance on digital inputs and the emergence of new business models [22][23] Summary by Sections Executive Summary - The report builds on previous G20 work to develop a common framework for measuring the Digital Economy, proposing a definition and indicators for jobs, skills, and growth [21][47] Chapter 1: Measuring the Digital Economy - The chapter provides context for the Digital Economy, showcasing key trends and updating indicators from the 2018 G20 Toolkit [22][23] - It discusses the importance of infrastructure, societal empowerment, and innovation in driving the Digital Economy [23][24] Chapter 2: Definitions and Measurement Challenges - The chapter proposes a comprehensive definition of the Digital Economy, emphasizing economic activities reliant on digital inputs [25][26] - It introduces a tiered framework to categorize different aspects of the Digital Economy, including core, narrow, broad measures, and the digital society [27][28] Chapter 3: Jobs, Skills, and Growth - This chapter presents indicators related to jobs in the Digital Economy, highlighting the growth of digital-intensive sectors and the impact of digitalization on employment [36][37] - It emphasizes the need for skills development to meet the demands of the Digital Economy and the importance of monitoring gender disparities in ICT-related occupations [36][37] Chapter 4: Roadmap for a Common Framework - The chapter outlines practical steps for implementing the G20 definition and indicators, focusing on building capacity and improving data collection [778][779] - It emphasizes the need for collaboration among G20 countries and international organizations to enhance measurement efforts [780][781]

OECD Economic Outlook Volume 2024/2 No. 116 December 2024 OECD Economic Outlook December 2024 PRELIMINARY VERSION OECD ECONOMIC OUTLOOK 116 DECEMBER 2024 PRELIMINARY VERSION This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Member countries of the OECD. This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty ov ...

PERFORMANCE AUDITING IN POLAND Best practices | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |-------|-----------|----------------------------------|-------------|----------------------------------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Funded by the European Union | | | | | E H | 11 | HI | | | | 册> BE ji | 用用 H H | H 用用 电用 | | | | | BETTER POLICIES FOR BETTER LIVES | | Ministry of Finance Republic of Poland | This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in n ...

Investment Rating - The report does not provide a specific investment rating for the industry or initiatives assessed Core Insights - The OECD alignment assessments aim to evaluate sustainability initiatives' alignment with OECD due diligence guidance and credibility criteria, enhancing clarity for stakeholders regarding the initiatives' scope and credibility [6][22] - The methodology is designed to adapt to various initiatives, focusing on their specific activities and governance systems, rather than conducting a broad evaluation [24][25] - The assessments include a comprehensive approach involving document reviews, stakeholder interviews, and shadow assessments to ensure a thorough evaluation of the initiatives [52][72] Summary by Sections Purpose, Focus, and Process of OECD Alignment Assessments - The purpose of OECD alignment assessments is to evaluate sustainability initiatives against OECD due diligence guidance, aiming to strengthen and harmonize approaches to due diligence [22] - The assessments focus on the standards, activities, processes, and systems of sustainability initiatives rather than the due diligence of individual enterprises [23] - The selection of initiatives for assessment considers factors such as scope, due diligence integration, and the status of policies and implementation activities [30][34] Assessment Methodology - The assessment methodology consists of three main components: standards assessment, implementation assessment, and credibility assessment [35] - Each component involves specific activities such as document reviews, interviews, and shadow assessments to gather evidence and evaluate alignment with OECD standards [72][75] - The methodology allows for flexibility, enabling assessments to be tailored to the specific context and activities of the initiative being evaluated [24][25] Interpretation and Ratings - The assessment process includes interpreting criteria, documenting analysis, and providing ratings based on the findings [3.1][3.2] - Detailed public assessment reports are essential for explaining the scope and outcomes of the assessments to stakeholders [26][28] Stakeholder Consultation and Publishing Assessment Results - Stakeholder consultation is a critical part of the assessment process, ensuring that diverse perspectives are considered [4.1] - The final assessment results are published to provide transparency and clarity regarding the initiative's alignment with OECD standards [4.2]