Core Viewpoint - An investigation is underway regarding Under Armour's Board of Directors for potential breaches of fiduciary duties related to cybersecurity events affecting the Company's data systems [1]. Company Overview - Under Armour, Inc. is a global sportswear and performance gear company based in Baltimore, MD, specializing in the design, development, marketing, and distribution of athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories worldwide [2]. Legal Firm Background - Berger Montague PC is a prominent law firm in the U.S. focusing on complex civil litigation, class actions, and mass torts, with over $2.4 billion in post-trial judgments in 2025 and more than $50 billion recovered for clients over 55 years [3].

Group 1 - The core issue involves an investigation into Stride, Inc.'s Board of Directors for potential breaches of fiduciary duties, particularly regarding oversight and governance related to the company's public statements on operations and financial performance [1] - Stride, Inc. is an education technology company based in Reston, Virginia, providing online learning programs, curricula, and support services to schools and districts across the United States [2] - Berger Montague, the law firm conducting the investigation, is recognized for its expertise in complex civil litigation and has recovered over $50 billion for clients over its 55-year history [3]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Varonis Systems, Inc. on behalf of investors who acquired its securities during the specified class period, highlighting concerns over the company's financial disclosures and performance [1][3]. Company Overview - Varonis Systems, Inc. is a global security company based in Miami, Florida, specializing in software products that utilize AI technologies to detect advanced security threats [2]. Financial Performance - On October 28, 2025, Varonis disclosed a significant miss in annual recurring revenue (ARR) and reduced its guidance for the full fiscal year 2025, attributing this to weaker-than-expected customer renewals and conversions in its subscription business [3]. - The company also announced the end-of-life for its self-hosted solution and a 5% reduction in headcount during the same announcement [3]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the financial disclosure on October 28, 2025, Varonis' stock price plummeted from $63.00 to $32.34 per share, marking a decline of $30.66 per share, or over 48%, in just one day [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against BellRing Brands, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding the company's sales growth during the specified period [1][3]. Company Overview - BellRing Brands, Inc. is headquartered in St. Louis, MO, and markets nutrition products including ready-to-drink protein shakes, nutrition drinks, powders, and protein bars under the Premier Protein and Dymatize brands [2]. Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that during the class period from November 19, 2024, to August 4, 2025, BellRing's CEO and CFO misrepresented the company's sales growth as being driven by increased consumer demand and organic growth, while downplaying competitive impacts [3]. - Contrary to the defendants' statements, the lawsuit alleges that the reported sales were primarily due to inventory stockpiling by key customers [4].

PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- National plaintiffs’ law firm Berger Montague PC announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ: METC) (“Ramaco” or the “Company”) on behalf of investors who purchased Ramaco securities during the period from July 31, 2025 through October 23, 2025 (the “Class Period”). Investor Deadline: Investors who purchased Ramaco securities during the Class Period may, no later than March 31, 2026, seek to be appointed as a lea ...

Group 1 - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fermi Inc. on behalf of investors who acquired Fermi securities during the Class Period from October 1, 2025, to December 11, 2025 [1][2] - Fermi is headquartered in Amarillo, Texas, and aims to establish a network of large, grid-independent data centers powered by various energy sources, including nuclear, natural gas, solar, and battery energy [3] - The company's flagship project, "Project Matador," is designed to create the world's largest private energy campus dedicated to powering AI data centers [3] Group 2 - The lawsuit claims that investors became aware of Fermi's true prospects on December 12, 2025, when the first tenant for Project Matador terminated a $150 million agreement intended to cover construction costs [4] - Following the announcement, Fermi's shares dropped by $5.16, nearly 34%, closing at $10.09 per share on December 12, 2025 [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Klarna Group plc on behalf of investors who acquired Klarna securities during the specified Class Period, alleging omissions in the IPO Registration Statement regarding potential increases in loss reserves [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit targets investors who purchased Klarna securities from September 7, 2025, to December 22, 2025, including shares from the September 2025 IPO [1]. - The complaint claims that Klarna's IPO Registration Statement failed to disclose critical information about the potential increase in loss reserves, which the defendants should have been aware of due to the risk profiles of their customers [3]. - Reports starting November 18, 2025, indicated that Klarna was raising its provisions for credit losses due to defaults, which is central to the allegations in the lawsuit [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance - As of the lawsuit filing, Klarna shares were trading at $31.31, significantly lower than the IPO price of $40 [4]. Group 3: Company Overview - Klarna is a financial technology company based in Stockholm, Sweden, that facilitates loans for small purchases, including food delivery services [2].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Coupang, Inc. for alleged misleading statements regarding its cybersecurity, which resulted in significant investor losses during the specified class period [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who acquired Coupang securities from May 7, 2025, to December 16, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until February 17, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives [2]. - The complaint claims that inadequate cybersecurity allowed a former employee to access sensitive customer information undetected for nearly six months [3]. Group 2: Company Impact - Following the cyber event, Coupang's CEO resigned, indicating a significant impact on company leadership and investor confidence [3]. - The lawsuit highlights the potential financial repercussions for Coupang, as investors reportedly suffered significant losses due to the alleged cybersecurity failures [3]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Berger Montague, the law firm representing the plaintiffs, is noted for its expertise in complex civil litigation and has recovered over $50 billion for clients over its 55-year history [4]. - The firm has a strong track record in various legal areas, including securities, which is relevant to the current lawsuit against Coupang [4].

PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- National plaintiffs’ law firm Berger Montague PC announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE: ITGR) (“Integer” or the “Company”) on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Integer securities during the period of July 25, 2024 through October 22, 2025 (the “Class Period”), inclusive. Investor Deadline: Investors who purchased Integer securities during the Class Period may, no later than Februar ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Beyond Meat, Inc. on behalf of investors who acquired its securities during the specified Class Period, alleging misleading statements regarding the company's financial health and operational focus [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is initiated by Berger Montague PC, representing investors who purchased Beyond Meat securities from February 27, 2025, to November 11, 2025 [1][2]. - Investors have until March 24, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representative of the class [2]. Group 2: Company Performance and Allegations - Throughout the Class Period, Beyond Meat claimed it was focused on achieving EBITDA-positive operations by the end of 2026, emphasizing cost reductions and operational optimization while downplaying revenue growth [3]. - The complaint alleges that Beyond Meat failed to disclose impairments of long-lived assets and a significant non-cash impairment charge, which led to a stock price drop of over 23% on October 24, 2025, following the announcement of expected impairment charges [4]. - Additional disclosures in November 2025 regarding delayed SEC filings and $77.4 million in impairment charges resulted in further stock declines of approximately 16%, 9%, and 9%, leading to substantial investor losses [4].