Samson Mow, a prominent Bitcoin advocate known for repeatedly predicting a $1 million Bitcoin price, said he does not take recent bearish price targets seriously and claimed he fired an analyst who forecast Bitcoin would fall to $60,000. Mow escalated his criticism in a post on X on Dec 21, writing: “I’ve fired the analyst that said Bitcoin is going to $60k. He will never work in this industry again.” The post did not identify the analyst or clarify their role, and it drew mixed reactions from the crypt ...

🤔 The Ethereum call by @fundstrat for its market value to reach $7.5K has not come to fruition yet. Crypto's #2 asset is -36.8% since he made his August post.🔗 Keep track of crypto KOL's best and worst predictors on the Sanitizer leaderboard! 👇https://t.co/IMTGYhufp2KOL Tracker (@KOLs_Tracker):not at the top of $ETH 😭View other tracked market calls made by KOLs here:https://t.co/5rTjWG6kUo https://t.co/yNLnbr6fmh ...

Pounding the table on ETH in public, bearish on 1H 2026 in private — can Tom Lee’s team still be trusted?Fundstrat’s internal 2026 outlook warns of a potential crypto pullback in 1H 2026, with ETH seen falling to $1,800–$2,000, sharply contrasting with Tom Lee’s highly bullish public calls for ETH above $10,000–$15,000. The gap between public optimism and private caution has sparked scrutiny over disclosure, conflicts of interest, and the credibility of Fundstrat’s research messaging, especially given Lee’s ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent debate regarding conflicting Bitcoin forecasts from Fundstrat analysts has raised questions about the consistency of professional analysis in the market [1][2] Group 1: Analyst Predictions - Analyst Tom Lee predicts a "new high in early 2026," while Sean Farrell anticipates a "pullback to the $60,000 range in the first half of 2026," highlighting a stark contrast in their forecasts [1][2] - This internal conflict is seen as a normal occurrence in professional research, where multi-dimensional and multi-cycle strategies coexist rather than indicating a lack of consensus [1][2] Group 2: Risk Management vs. Long-term Trends - Farrell's $60,000 pullback scenario is based on a defensive positioning framework, focusing on monitoring capital flows, investor cost basis, and short-term pullback risks [2][4] - This strategy is a risk management decision aimed at reducing cryptocurrency exposure to avoid potential volatility, not a pessimistic view on Bitcoin's long-term adoption [2][4] - In contrast, Tom Lee's approach emphasizes deep insights into macro liquidity cycles and structural market changes [4][5] Group 3: Institutional Response and Investor Guidance - Tom Lee acknowledged the "duty differentiation" theory on social media, which helped quell external doubts about the conflicting predictions [3][5] - The incident reflects the rigorous approach of top investment institutions when dealing with high-volatility assets, utilizing independent operations across macro strategies, risk hedging, and technical analysis [3][5] - ZFX Shanhai Securities advises mature investors to establish a comprehensive investment system that includes both long-term value judgments and short-term defensive mechanisms, rather than blindly pursuing singular bullish or bearish conclusions [3][5]

I don't think the Bitcoin high is in place, but you're right. Uh, you know, we were too optimistic about this happening by December, but I do think Bitcoin can make an all-time high by the end of January. So, I I don't think we should we should think the highs are in place for Bitcoin or Ethereum or crypto.So, so there we have Tom Lee saying that we can very well see an all-time high for Bitcoin by the end of January. He also said that they were wrong on their December rally uh call and a lot of people are ...

Group 1 - Fundstrat's digital asset strategy is led by Sean Farrell, who emphasizes active management and risk rebalancing for clients with a high allocation to crypto assets [1] - The team at Fundstrat consists of multiple analysts, each with independent research frameworks and timelines to cater to different client needs [1] - Tom Lee focuses on institutional investors who allocate only 1%-5% of their funds to BTC and ETH, emphasizing long-term macro trends and structural judgments [1]

🚨 UPDATE: Fundstrat’s Sean Farrell says that the news that they are bearish is a misunderstanding of how Fundstrat works. https://t.co/6UapJfuOyo ...

Responding to WuBlockchain, Fundstrat Head of Digital Asset Strategy Sean Farrell clarified that Fundstrat’s differing crypto outlooks reflect independent analyst frameworks serving different clients and time horizons, not internal conflict. Farrell focuses on active management for high-crypto portfolios, while Tom Lee targets large institutions allocating 1–5% to BTC and ETH, emphasizing long-term macro and structural trends.https://t.co/mrQB1ACKGG ...

⚡ BIG: A leaked Fundstrat outlook warns of a major crypto pullback in early 2026, clashing with Tom Lee’s bullish calls. https://t.co/yDlLSKmwcR ...

GOOD MORNING CRYPTO ☀️☀️☕️☕️TOM LEE NOW EXPECTS $60,000 BITCOINYOU CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP 😂😂Coin Bureau (@coinbureau):🚨 TOM LEE’S FUND SEES BITCOIN BACK TO $60K SOONFundstrat, led by Tom Lee, told clients to expect a major crypto correction in H1 2026.In an internal report, crypto head Sean Farrell said his base case points to $BTC at $60K–$65K, $ETH at $1.8K–$2K, and $SOL at $50–$75. https://t.co/WGEhvbbnFo ...