Atkins said Ramaco did not cut wages or benefits despite a difficult market environment, and he credited productivity in the fourth quarter as the strongest of the year. Sussman reported fourth-quarter cash margins of $24 per ton , matching the first quarter as the strongest of 2025, even as U.S. high-vol metallurgical coal indices fell during the period.Chairman and CEO Randy Atkins said the quarter marked “the best quarter in years” for the company’s metallurgical coal operations, emphasizing cost control ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Beyond Meat, Inc. for allegedly misrepresenting its financial condition, particularly regarding impairment charges related to long-lived assets, which led to significant stock price declines and investor harm [1]. Company Overview - Beyond Meat, headquartered in El Segundo, California, specializes in developing and marketing plant-based meat products under the "Beyond" brand name [1]. Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit pertains to investors who acquired Beyond Meat securities between February 27, 2025, and November 11, 2025, with a deadline for lead plaintiff applications set for March 24, 2026 [1]. - The complaint claims that Beyond Meat failed to disclose that the book value of certain long-lived assets exceeded their fair value, making a material non-cash impairment charge likely [1]. - Following disclosures starting October 24, 2025, Beyond Meat reported $77.4 million in impairment charges, which negatively impacted the company's stock price and harmed investors [1].

Polen Capital, an investment management company, released its fourth-quarter investor letter for “Polen 5Perspectives Small Growth Strategy”. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. The Polen 5Perspectives Small Growth Composite Portfolio returned -1.3% gross and -1.5% net of fees in the fourth quarter of 2025, compared to a 1.2% return of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. Following double-digit returns in 2Q and 3Q, small caps concluded the year with a 1.2% return in 4Q. Biotech stood out as a major per ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Ramaco Resources, Inc. securities between July 31, 2025, and October 23, 2025, of the March 31, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Ramaco securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court by March 31, 2026, to serve as lead plaintiff [2] - The lead plaintiff acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation [2] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and has been ranked highly for its number of settlements since 2013 [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Ramaco's defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding mining activities at the Brook Mine, overstating development progress [4] - It is claimed that no significant mining activity had commenced, and as a result, positive statements about Ramaco's business were misleading [4] - Investors reportedly suffered damages when the true details about the company's operations were revealed [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Ramaco Resources, Inc. securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Ramaco securities between July 31, 2025, and October 23, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 31, 2026 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the mining activities at the Brook Mine, claiming that significant work had not commenced despite positive statements about Ramaco's business and operations [5]. - The lawsuit claims that the lack of actual mining activity led to an overstatement of development progress, resulting in misleading information provided to investors [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in recovering significant settlements for investors [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, including being ranked No. 1 for the number of settlements in 2017 and securing over $438 million for investors in 2019 alone [4].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. (EDR) and reminds investors of the March 18, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action filed against the company [1] Group 1: Legal Action and Allegations - The complaint alleges that Endeavor and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and failing to disclose critical information in the January 15, 2025 Information Statement and related SEC filings [1][1] - Specific allegations include misleading investors about the true value of Endeavor's shares, inadequate disclosure of executive earnings under the terms of the Merger, and undisclosed conflicts of interest involving Endeavor's special committee and financial advisor [1][1] Group 2: Class Action Participation - The court-appointed lead plaintiff is defined as the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class, who is also typical of class members and oversees the litigation on their behalf [1] - Any member of the putative class can move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through their chosen counsel or may choose to remain an absent class member without affecting their ability to share in any recovery [1][1]

Core Insights - ICON plc is under investigation following an internal accounting probe that revealed potential revenue overstatements for fiscal years 2023 and 2024, estimated at up to 2% each year [1] - The company has delayed the release of its fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 financial results due to this investigation [1] Company Overview - ICON plc is one of the largest contract research organizations (CROs) globally, providing outsourced drug development and clinical trial management services to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies [1] - The CRO industry relies on long-term service contracts, making accurate revenue recognition critical [1] Financial Impact - An overstatement of up to 2% on annual revenue, given ICON's reported full-year revenue exceeding $8 billion, could represent a discrepancy of approximately $160 million per year [1] - This discrepancy could materially affect earnings per share, operating margins, and year-over-year growth rates [1] Recent Financial Performance - In the third quarter of 2025, the company reported revenue of $2.043 billion, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 0.6% [1] - The previous year's comparison figures for this growth claim are now under review due to the ongoing investigation [1] Market Reaction - Following the February 12, 2026 disclosure, ICON plc's shares declined approximately 40%, resulting in the loss of billions in market capitalization [1] - The company had repurchased $750 million of its own shares in the first three quarters of 2025 and authorized an additional $1 billion repurchase program in the second quarter, which was presented against a backdrop of a "very strong" financial position [1]

Oracle Corporation Sued for Securities Law Violations - Contact Levi & Korsinsky Before April 6, 2026 to Discuss Your Rights - ORCL [Accessibility Statement] Skip NavigationNEW YORK, Feb. 18, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Oracle Corporation ("Oracle" or the "Company") (NYSE: ORCL) of a class action securities lawsuit.CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Oracle investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between June 12, 2 ...

Core Viewpoint - Varonis Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRNS) is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading statements regarding its ability to maintain annual recurring revenue (ARR) projections while transitioning customers to a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model [1] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit pertains to investors who purchased Varonis common stock between February 4, 2025, and October 28, 2025 [1] - Allegations include that Varonis was unable to maintain ARR projections and failed to effectively convert existing on-premises customers to the SaaS offering, leading to reduced growth potential [1] - The lawsuit claims that the defendants' positive statements about Varonis' business and prospects were materially misleading [1] Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm is encouraging affected investors to join the class action, highlighting its experience and success in securities class actions [1] - Investors can join the class action without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by March 9, 2026, to represent the interests of the class [1]

Group 1: Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ:METC) - A class action has been initiated on behalf of stockholders of Ramaco Resources, Inc. with a class period from July 31, 2025, to October 23, 2025, and a lead plaintiff deadline of March 31, 2026 [7] - The complaint alleges that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its Brook Mine operations, including the failure to commence significant mining activity and overstating development progress [7] - Following a report by Wolfpack Research, which claimed the Brook Mine was a "hoax" and showed no active work, Ramaco's stock price fell by $3.81, or 9.6%, closing at $36.01 per share on October 23, 2025 [7] Group 2: Beyond Meat, Inc. (NASDAQ:BYND) - A class action has been initiated on behalf of stockholders of Beyond Meat, Inc. with a class period from February 27, 2025, to November 11, 2025, and a lead plaintiff deadline of March 24, 2026 [7] - The lawsuit alleges that the company issued false and misleading statements regarding its long-lived assets, indicating that their book value exceeded fair value, which could lead to a material, non-cash impairment charge [7] - Additionally, the allegations suggest that these issues could impair Beyond Meat's ability to timely file periodic reports with the SEC [7]