Core Viewpoint - NuScale Power Corporation is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements regarding its commercialization partnership with ENTRA1 Energy LLC and significant financial losses reported in Q3 2025 [1] Company Overview - NuScale Power Corporation specializes in small modular nuclear reactors, specifically the NuScale Power Module (NPM) designed for energy generation [1] - The company entered a global commercialization partnership with ENTRA1 Energy LLC prior to the class action period, which was expected to advance its NPM technology from development to deployment [1] Allegations and Financial Impact - The lawsuit claims that NuScale and its executives made false statements about ENTRA1's capabilities, failing to disclose that ENTRA1 had no significant experience in building or operating nuclear power projects [1] - NuScale's general and administrative expenses surged over 3,000% to $519 million in Q3 2025, primarily due to a $495 million payment to ENTRA1 for the TVA agreement, leading to a net loss of $532 million, up from $46 million in the previous year [1] - Following the financial disclosures, NuScale's Class A shares dropped more than 12% over two days [1] Class Action Details - Investors who purchased NuScale Class A common stock between May 13, 2025, and November 6, 2025, can seek to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit [1] - The lawsuit is titled Truedson v. NuScale Power Corporation, No. 26-cv-00328 (D. Or.) [1] Legal Representation - The law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is representing the plaintiffs and has a strong track record in prosecuting investor class actions, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [1]

Core Viewpoint - An investigation has been launched into potential breaches of fiduciary duty by the directors, officers, and controlling shareholder of Mister Car Wash, Inc. following its announcement of a merger agreement with Leonard Green & Partners at a price significantly below its recent trading high [1] Company Overview - Mister Car Wash operates approximately 550 locations and claims to have the largest car wash subscription program in North America [1] Acquisition Details - On February 18, 2026, Mister Car Wash announced a definitive merger agreement with investment funds managed by Leonard Green & Partners, offering $7.00 per share, which represents a nearly 20% discount from the company's 52-week high [1] - Leonard Green currently owns about 67% of Mister Car Wash's outstanding shares and has secured the necessary vote for the acquisition through a "Written Consent," eliminating the need for a vote from minority stockholders [1] - If the acquisition is completed, Mister Car Wash's common stock will be delisted from the Nasdaq Global Market and deregistered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [1]

Company Overview - Oddity Tech Ltd. operates as a consumer technology company focused on building digital-first brands within the beauty and wellness industries [3] Financial Results and Issues - On February 25, 2026, Oddity reported its full year 2025 financial results, revealing a significant dislocation in its account with its largest advertising partner due to algorithm changes. This led to a diversion to lower quality auctions at abnormally high costs, resulting in increased new user acquisition costs that are not aligned with market trends or historical performance [4] - Following the announcement of these financial results, Oddity's stock price experienced a dramatic decline of over 49% [4] Legal Investigation - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is investigating potential violations of U.S. federal securities laws involving Oddity Tech Ltd. [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Enphase Energy class action lawsuit alleges that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding their financial and operational prospects, leading to significant stock price declines following the disclosure of negative financial results [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Tripathi v. Enphase Energy, Inc., and it involves purchasers of Enphase Energy securities from April 22, 2025, to October 28, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until April 20, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. - The lawsuit claims that Enphase Energy overstated its ability to manage channel inventory and mitigate the effects of the termination of the Residential Clean Energy Credit [3]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On October 28, 2025, Enphase Energy reported that elevated channel inventory would lead to lower battery storage shipments in Q4 2025 and that the expiration of the 25D Credit would negatively impact revenues in Q1 2026 [4]. - Following this announcement, Enphase Energy's stock price fell by more than 15% [4]. Group 3: Legal Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Enphase Energy securities during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status [5]. - The lead plaintiff represents the interests of all class members and can select a law firm to litigate the case [5]. Group 4: Law Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [6]. - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, including the largest securities class action recovery in history [6].

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 27, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of CoreWeave, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWV) securities between March 28, 2025 and December 15, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), have until Friday, March 13, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the CoreWeave class action lawsuit. Captioned Masaitis v. CoreWeave, Inc., No. 26-cv-00355 (D.N.J.), the CoreWeave class action lawsuit charges CoreWeave as well as certain of CoreWeave’ ...

Core Viewpoint - Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with claims that the company misled investors regarding the efficacy of its drug setrusumab for treating Osteogenesis Imperfecta [1][1][1] Summary by Relevant Sections Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Ultragenyx common stock between August 3, 2023, and December 26, 2025, can seek to be lead plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit, which is titled Bailey v. Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. [1][1] - The lawsuit alleges that Ultragenyx and its executives made false statements about the reliability of data from the Phase III Orbit study, which was intended to show the drug's effectiveness [1][1] Allegations Against Ultragenyx - The lawsuit claims that Ultragenyx created a misleading impression of having reliable information regarding the effects of setrusumab while downplaying the risks associated with the Phase III Orbit study [1][1] - It is alleged that the company failed to disclose that the Phase II results lacked a placebo control group, which could have influenced the perceived effectiveness of the treatment [1][1] Stock Price Impact - Following the announcement on July 9, 2025, that the Phase III Orbit study did not achieve statistical significance, Ultragenyx's stock price fell by more than 25% [1][1] - On December 29, 2025, after revealing that both the Phase III Orbit and Cosmic studies failed to meet primary endpoints, the stock price dropped by over 42% [1][1] Legal Process for Lead Plaintiffs - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who acquired Ultragenyx common stock during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff, representing the interests of all class members [1][1] - The lead plaintiff can choose a law firm to litigate the case, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any potential recovery [1][1] About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a prominent law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [1][1] - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, making it one of the largest plaintiffs' firms globally [1][1]

Core Viewpoint - Richtech Robotics Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for allegedly misleading investors about its relationship with Microsoft, which has resulted in a significant drop in its stock price [3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit, titled Diez v. Richtech Robotics Inc., allows purchasers of Richtech Robotics securities from January 27, 2026, to January 29, 2026, to seek lead plaintiff status by April 3, 2026 [1]. - The lawsuit alleges that Richtech Robotics falsely claimed a commercial relationship with Microsoft during the class period [3]. - Following the publication of an article by Hunterbrook Media on January 29, 2026, which denied any partnership with Microsoft, Richtech Robotics' Class B stock price fell over 29% within two trading days [4]. Group 2: Lead Plaintiff Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Richtech Robotics securities during the class period to seek lead plaintiff status, representing the interests of the class [5]. - The lead plaintiff is typically the investor with the greatest financial interest and must be adequate and typical of the class [5]. Group 3: Company Background - Richtech Robotics develops and sells robotic solutions for automation in the service industry [2].

Core Points - The CoreWeave class action lawsuit has been initiated against CoreWeave, Inc. and certain executives for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the class period from March 28, 2025, to December 15, 2025 [1] - CoreWeave is positioned as an AI cloud computing company and had announced a significant deal worth up to $11.9 billion with OpenAI shortly before its IPO [2] - The lawsuit claims that CoreWeave overstated its ability to meet customer demand and failed to disclose risks associated with reliance on a single third-party data center supplier, which could negatively impact revenue [3] Financial Impact - On October 30, 2025, Core Scientific announced it did not receive enough shareholder votes to approve its merger with CoreWeave, leading to a more than 6% drop in CoreWeave's share price [4] - Following a revenue guidance reduction on November 10, 2025, due to delays from a third-party data center developer, CoreWeave's shares fell over 16% [5] - A December 15, 2025 article revealed further delays in data center delivery, causing an additional 3.4% decline in CoreWeave's share price [6] Legal Process - Investors who purchased CoreWeave securities during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action lawsuit, representing the interests of all class members [7] Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading firm in complex class action litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 and a total of $8.4 billion over the past five years [8]

Company Overview - Driven Brands Holdings Inc. is claimed to be the largest automotive services company in North America, offering a variety of consumer and commercial automotive services such as oil changes, paint, collision repair, glass services, vehicle repair, and maintenance [2] Financial Disclosure - On February 25, 2026, Driven Brands announced that the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors identified material errors in previously issued consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2024, and December 30, 2023, as well as in unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for various quarterly and year-to-date periods in fiscal year 2024 [3] - The company stated that these financial statements should not be relied upon and will require restatement, leading to a delay in the release of financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 27, 2025 [3] - Following this announcement, Driven Brands' share price experienced a decline of approximately 30% [3]

INVESTOR DEADLINE: Enphase Energy, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead the Class Action Lawsuit [Accessibility Statement] Skip NavigationSAN DIEGO, Feb. 26, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- The law firm of [Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP] announces that purchasers or acquirers of Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENPH) securities between April 22, 2025 and October 28, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), have until April 20, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Enphase ...