战争权力
Search documents
油价上涨特朗普政府有“预案”?美国国会将就限制总统战争权力议案举行投票
第一财经· 2026-03-03 12:14
2026.03. 03 本文字数:2043,阅读时长大约4分钟 作者 | 第一财经 孙卓 3月2日,中国外交部发言人毛宁在例行记者会上表示,霍尔木兹海峡及其附近水域是重要的国际货 物和能源贸易通道,维护该地区安全稳定符合国际社会共同利益。中方敦促各方立即停止军事行动, 避免紧张事态进一步升级,防止地区局势动荡对全球经济发展造成更大影响。 油价问题提上日程 据新华社报道,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队2日表示,在新一轮反击行动中,伊朗共向美军在科威特、阿联 酋、巴林和霍尔木兹海峡的多个目标发射了5枚弹道导弹和26架无人机。 该报道称,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队旗下媒体赛帕新闻网发表声明说,伊朗此轮打击目标包括位于科威特 的美国阿里夫坚军营、位于阿联酋一空军基地的美国军事指挥控制中心、位于巴林的美国海军基地设 施以及位于霍尔木兹海峡的一艘油轮。 鲁比奥同日在美国国会表示,美国能源部长赖特和财政部长贝森特将负责执行油价相关的应对计划。 "我们早就知道这会成为一个因素。"鲁比奥谈到油价上涨时表示。"我们昨晚再次讨论了这个计划, 今天早上也谈了。从明天开始,你们将看到我们将推出循序渐进的计划,以缓解其影响。" 在白宫发表讲话时,特朗普则表 ...
“轰炸伊朗未经国会授权且违宪”,她呼吁弹劾特朗普
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-06-22 08:19
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding President Trump's military action against Iran, emphasizing that it was conducted without congressional authorization, which some lawmakers argue is grounds for impeachment [1][2][8]. Group 1: Congressional Response - Democratic lawmakers, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, are calling for impeachment proceedings against Trump due to the unauthorized military action against Iran [2][8]. - Several members of Congress, including Ro Khanna and Tim Kaine, are advocating for a vote on war powers to prevent further military engagement in the Middle East [3][4]. - There is a notable divide within the Republican Party, with some leaders supporting Trump's actions while others express concerns about constitutional violations [4][6]. Group 2: Military Action Details - On June 21, Trump announced that the U.S. military had successfully attacked three Iranian nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan [8][10]. - Reports indicate that the military action involved B-2 bombers and included the use of six bunker-buster bombs targeting the Fordow facility [8][10]. - The attack has raised concerns about escalating tensions in the Middle East, with Israel adjusting its military readiness in response to the situation [11]. Group 3: Implications for U.S.-Iran Relations - The military action is seen as a significant escalation in U.S.-Iran relations, with potential long-term consequences for regional stability [10][11]. - Iranian officials have stated that no radioactive materials were present at the targeted facilities, suggesting that Iran may have removed enriched uranium prior to the attack [11]. - The targeted facilities are critical to Iran's nuclear program, with Fordow and Natanz being key sites for uranium enrichment [11].