6月19日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。 有记者提问，据彭博社报道，美国官员正在为未来几天可能对伊朗的打击做准备。中方对此有何评论？ 郭嘉昆表示，当前中东地区局势紧张敏感，面临失控的风险，中方反对任何违反联合国宪章宗旨和原则、侵 犯别国主权安全和领土完整的行为，反对在国际关系中使用或威胁使用武力。 国际社会特别是有影响力的大 国，应秉持公正立场和负责任态度，为推动停火止战、重回对话谈判创造条件，避免地区局势滑向深渊，引 发更大的灾难。 有记者就以色列与伊朗军事冲突提问。 郭嘉昆表示，以色列和伊朗的军事冲突已持续一周，呈现出愈演愈烈的态势。不但给两国人民造成巨大伤 害，而且严重冲击地区和世界的和平稳定，中方对此深感担忧。冲突升级没有赢家，只会造成更大的破坏， 引发更大的动荡。 中方强烈呼吁冲突当事方，特别是以色列，以地区国家人民利益为重，立即停火止战，缓 解当前的紧张局势。 有记者提问，美国国务院宣布将恢复学生签证面试，中方如何看待这一政策？ 郭嘉昆表示，我们注意到有关动向。中美教育合作是互利的，中方一贯反对将教育合作政治化， 希望美方将 特朗普总统欢迎中国留学生来美学习的表态落到实处，切实保障在美中国留 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government opposes the politicization of educational cooperation and emphasizes the mutual benefits of Sino-American educational exchanges, stating that the U.S. actions will harm its international image and credibility [1]. Group 1: U.S. Visa Restrictions - The U.S. President announced visa restrictions for international students at Harvard University, suspending entry for foreign nationals studying or participating in exchange programs for an initial period of six months [1]. Group 2: Chinese Government's Response - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson highlighted the importance of maintaining the legitimate rights and interests of overseas Chinese students and scholars [1]. - The Chinese side firmly opposes the U.S. approach, asserting that it will only damage the U.S.'s reputation on the global stage [1].

金十数据6月5日讯，当地时间4日，美国宣布将对哈佛国际学生限制签证。对此，外交部新闻发言人林 剑表示，中美的教育合作是互利的，中方一贯反对将教育合作政治化，美方的有关做法只会损害美国的 形象和国际信誉。中方将坚定维护海外中国学生和学者的正当合法权益。 （央视新闻） 外交部：中方一贯反对将教育合作政治化 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. government has revoked Harvard University's eligibility to enroll international students, requiring existing foreign students to transfer [1] - Hong Kong's Chief Executive, John Lee, has welcomed students affected by U.S. policies to study in Hong Kong, with support from eight universities funded by the Education Bureau [1] - The cap on non-local student admissions at Education Bureau-funded universities in Hong Kong has been raised from 20% to 40%, with potential for further increases [1] Group 2 - Several Hong Kong universities, including the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), have expressed willingness to accept Harvard's international students, viewing the U.S. ban as an opportunity for Hong Kong's higher education [1] - HKUST has publicly invited current international undergraduate and graduate students from Harvard, as well as those holding admission offers, to join their institution [1] - HKUST has committed to prioritizing the admission applications, credit transfers, and customized support for these students, including visa assistance and accommodation arrangements [1]

8所港校行动。 据央视新闻消息，美国政府此前宣布取消哈佛大学招收国际学生的资格，并要求现有的外国学生转学。香港特 区行政长官李家超5月27日表示， 欢迎任何受美国政策影响或就读美国大学面临困难的学生来港求学，特区政 府将联同8间由教资会资助的大学，协助和支援受到不公平对待的学生，帮助他们在港继续学业。 李家超还表示，香港特区将与哈佛校友会保持联络和合作，协助有关受到不公平对待的学生。 他提到，已将 教资会资助大学的非本地生录取上限由20%提升至40%，但如有需要，特区政府会考虑进一步提高有关上限 ， 他希望将有关信息给予学生知悉，香港的大学欢迎他们来港继续学业。 据了解，香港多所高校近日表示，愿意接收哈佛国际学生。香港舆论认为，美国政府对哈佛招收国际学生的禁 令为香港高等教育带来发展新契机。 其中，香港科技大学5月23日发表声明欢迎这些国际生加入科大，并表示愿无条件录取转学生。 声明向现在正就读于哈佛大学的国际本科生及研究生，以及持有哈佛学位课程录取通知的学生发出公开邀请， 欢迎他们加入科大继续学业，延续学术追求。"此举旨在应对全球学术环境的变化，并彰显科大致力营造多 元、世界级学习环境的承诺。" "科大将优 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. government announced a ban on Harvard University from enrolling international students, prompting Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) to welcome these students and offer unconditional admission [1][2] - Harvard University has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government regarding the international student ban, claiming it violates the First Amendment and federal laws, affecting over 7,000 visa-holding students [2][3] - The Hong Kong Education Bureau has encouraged local universities to provide facilitation measures for eligible international students, emphasizing the importance of protecting their rights [2][3] Group 2 - Harvard has previously sued the U.S. government multiple times this year, including a lawsuit related to the freezing of federal funds amounting to $2.2 billion and an additional $450 million [3] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry has expressed opposition to the politicization of educational cooperation between China and the U.S., stating that such actions will harm the U.S.'s image and international credibility [3]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government has revoked Harvard University's eligibility to enroll international students, impacting approximately 6,800 international students currently studying at the institution [1][8][14]. Group 1: Harvard University's Situation - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cited Harvard's failure to comply with requirements for reporting international student records as the reason for the revocation [8][9]. - Harvard University has announced plans to file a lawsuit against the U.S. government, claiming the decision is illegal and detrimental to its academic mission [13][14]. - The decision will take effect from the 2025-2026 academic year, requiring current international students to transfer to other institutions to maintain their legal status in the U.S. [14][15]. Group 2: Response from Hong Kong University - The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) has extended an invitation to Harvard's international students to continue their studies at HKUST, emphasizing its commitment to a diverse and world-class learning environment [1][2]. - HKUST plans to provide unconditional admission, simplified enrollment procedures, and academic support for students wishing to transfer [1][2]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The U.S. government's actions are seen as a warning to all universities regarding compliance with federal regulations concerning international students [10][12]. - The situation reflects ongoing tensions in U.S.-China educational cooperation, with Chinese students making up 20% of Harvard's international student body [6][15].

据央视新闻报道，当地时间5月2 3日， 哈佛大学表示，已就美国政府对该校的国际学生禁令 提起诉讼。 据悉，哈佛大学因美国总统特朗普决定取消其招收国际学生的资格而起诉美政府。 哈佛大学在向波士顿联邦地区法院提起的诉讼中称，美国政府的撤销决定"公然违反"了美国 宪法第一修正案和其他联邦法律。该校还表示，这一决定对学校和七千多名签证持有者产生 了"直接和毁灭性的影响"。 同日， 美国马萨诸塞州联邦地区法院一名法官对特朗普政府禁止哈佛大学招收国际学生的政 策发出临时限制令，要求在举行听证会之前"维持现状"。 港科大宣布：无条件录取哈佛国际生 据南方都市报报道，5月2 3日，南都记者从香港科技大学获悉，该校向现正就读哈佛大学的国 际本科生及研究生，以及持有哈佛学位课程录取通知的学生，发出公开邀请，欢迎他们加入 港科大继续学业，延续学术追求。此举旨在应对全球学术环境的变化，并彰显港科大致力营 造多元、世界级学习环境的承诺。 美官员警告所有大学： 应好自为之 尽快整顿 据央视新闻报道，美国政府当地时间5月2 2日宣布取消哈佛大学获得的学生和交流学者项目资 质，禁止该校招收国际学生。哈佛大学现有外国学生也必须转学。学生和交流 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government has announced the cancellation of Harvard University's eligibility to enroll international students, marking a significant escalation in government pressure on elite institutions to align with presidential agendas [1][4]. Group 1: Government Actions - The decision to prohibit Harvard from enrolling international students will take effect from the 2025-2026 academic year, with the U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security stating that enrolling foreign students is a "privilege" rather than a "right" [4]. - The U.S. government has accused Harvard of becoming a "hotbed of anti-American, anti-Semitic, and pro-terrorism incitement" [4]. - Harvard University has condemned the government's decision as "illegal" and claims it could severely harm the academic and research mission of the institution [4]. Group 2: Impact on Harvard - As of the fall 2023 semester, international students make up over 27% of Harvard's total student body, with nearly 6,800 international students from over 140 countries [6]. - The new policy is expected to particularly impact graduate programs at Harvard, where international students contribute significantly to the diversity and financial resources of the university [6]. - Harvard's tuition for the 2025-2026 academic year is set at $59,320, with total costs reaching approximately $87,000, highlighting the financial contributions of international students who typically do not qualify for federal financial aid [6]. Group 3: Reactions and Future Uncertainty - Many international students at Harvard are feeling confused and uncertain about their future, with some being advised to delay travel plans or remain close to campus to avoid legal risks due to potential visa policy changes [7]. - A federal judge in California has issued an injunction preventing the government from terminating the legal status of international students during the ongoing legal proceedings [8]. - Concerns have been raised about the potential loss of talent and innovation in U.S. higher education, with some academics considering opportunities in other countries due to the changing environment in the U.S. [8].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government has revoked Harvard University's eligibility for the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), prohibiting the school from enrolling international students, which significantly impacts the university's international student population and academic operations [3][4][5]. Group 1: Impact on International Students - Harvard University has approximately 6,793 international students for the 2024-2025 academic year, accounting for 27.2% of its total student body, many of whom hold F-1 or J-1 visas and must transfer to avoid losing their legal status [4]. - The revocation of SEVP certification forces current international students to choose between transferring, changing their immigration status, or leaving the U.S., with failure to transfer resulting in illegal status [4][5]. - The loss of international students is expected to disrupt research projects and laboratory operations, as these students are integral to Harvard's research community [4]. Group 2: Broader Implications for Harvard University - The decision to revoke Harvard's SEVP status is described as a retaliatory action by the Trump administration, which could severely damage the university's academic and research missions [3][6]. - The university faces a potential loss of new international students for the upcoming academic year, leading to a significant decline in enrollment and revenue, as well as a reputational crisis on a global scale [5][6]. - Harvard has indicated that the government's actions are illegal and harmful, and it is taking steps to provide guidance and support to affected community members [3][4]. Group 3: Government Actions and Responses - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security stated that the revocation serves as a warning to all universities and academic institutions regarding compliance with federal laws [3]. - Harvard has been under scrutiny for its policies and has faced threats of funding cuts, with the government previously freezing $2.2 billion in federal funding and an additional $450 million in grants due to non-compliance with reform requests [10][11]. - The university has initiated legal action against the government, claiming that the attempts to manipulate its academic decisions through funding cuts are unlawful [10].