Core Viewpoint - The Supreme Court's ruling on tariffs is seen as a setback for the U.S. government, particularly affecting President Trump's ability to impose tariffs as a tool for foreign policy and national security [1][10]. Group 1: Tariff Implementation - President Trump announced the imposition of a 10% global tariff under section 122, in addition to existing tariffs, to combat unfair trading practices [2][6]. - The ruling allows the president to maintain trade embargos against entire nations, indicating that while tariffs are limited, other forms of trade restrictions remain available [3][10]. Group 2: Impact on National Security - The removal of certain tariff powers is viewed as detrimental to national security, particularly in light of previous successful tariffs that led to a decline in fentanyl deaths [8][12]. - The Supreme Court's decision is perceived as diminishing the president's leverage in negotiations, although it still allows for full embargoes [10][11]. Group 3: Political Implications - The ruling has sparked discussions about the balance of power between the presidency and Congress regarding trade policies, with some suggesting it may affect future judicial appointments and political strategies [5][6]. - The ongoing debate highlights the importance of tariffs in protecting U.S. jobs and industries, as emphasized by various political figures [7].

Donald Trump's problem with trying to be an autocrat continues. And polling shows he's having trouble here. He's sagging at 39%.The immigration outrage is part of that. The L. A.Times reports all of this taking a toll with crashing trust in our elections, concerns about misuse of ICE and other federal agents. 30% of the voters think that immigration officials might be at polling locations, including a larger share of minority Americans. And that matters because the belief by 46%, say, of perfectly lawful Hi ...

I remember the last time you sat in that chair and we asked you if we were about to strike Iran. I believe your answer was yes, and of course we did. How about now.Well, I think we're going to do it again. I think just first, just considering the politics of it all, I think president the President Trump has already said that he is painted into a corner more or less by saying we're locked and loaded and you should come out onto the streets. And if we don't do it, it sort of it really raises the strategic wor ...

Foreign policy concerns, economic fears and quality of life were cited as the main reasons one-third of American millionaires said they're more likely to leave the country as Trump's second term hits the one-year mark, according to a survey.Read more: https://t.co/wFDXsVrB11Photo: Anna Moneymaker via Getty Images ...

In today’s India Edition, Menaka Doshi writes on the overhaul of the flagship jobs plan, and Dan Strumpf takes a took at the Modi government’s foreign policy report card. https://t.co/DrnU3kW65R ...

US Foreign Policy & Military Actions - Bipartisan investigations are rare but occurring regarding the US military actions in the Caribbean, indicating serious concerns in Congress [3][4] - The US military's actions of bombing boats in the Caribbean without clear identification and due process are considered unconventional and worrisome [6][7] - The approach of using military force against suspected drug smugglers, instead of the Coast Guard's law enforcement procedures, is seen as an overreach and a contravention of established legal approaches [8][9] - The amassing of a large military force near Venezuela raises questions about the US's goals and potential regime change intentions in the region [10] - The handling of survivors from the strikes, specifically the decision not to bring them to the US for trial if they were indeed drug traffickers, raises suspicions [12] Secretary of Defense (Hegsth) & Administration Concerns - Secretary Hegsth is facing bipartisan criticism and investigations, potentially creating problems for the Trump administration [2][4] - Congress may demand testimony from Hegsth and other military leaders under oath, indicating a lack of trust in briefings alone [18] - The "Signalgate" issue, involving Hegsth sharing arguably classified information on an unsecured platform, is back in the news and continues to be a concern for members of Congress [20][22][24] Broader Political & Diplomatic Context - The administration's foreign policy is perceived as pivoting away from Asia and Europe, focusing more on the Western Hemisphere and homeland security [29] - The administration's approach to the Russia-Ukraine peace deal is viewed as prioritizing financial dealings over the content of the peace itself [30] - The president's denigration of Somali immigrants and the administration's anti-immigration stance raise concerns about the country's values and economic vitality [26][30][31]

Joining us, MS Now congressional reporter Michael Schnell, editor and chief of foreign policy and host of FP Live, Ravi Agarwal, and retired fourstar general and MS Now military analyst, General Barry McCaffrey. Interesting to see um so many Republican lawmakers today, Michael, saying that they're concerned and they need more more answers out of the Pentagon. >> Yeah, Katie.And notably, it's the bipartisan lawmakers, including those Republicans from a pair of key committees, both the House Armed Services Co ...

Let's bring in Ankush Cardori, former federal prosecutor, now senior writer with Politico magazine, and Mark Lieovich, staff writer with The Atlantic, author and MSNBC political contributor. Welcome, guys. So, anush you first here because the new Washington Post report says the War Powers Resolution does not apply to deadly boat strikes, which the administration has said killed 64 people so far.And that's because US service members have not been put in harm's way. Is this argument legally sound. And if they ...

International Relations & Trade Policy - US-Canada relations are strained due to a perceived slight from a Canadian advertisement, leading to potential trade policy implications [1][2] - The US President's reaction to the advertisement is described as easily triggered and capable of influencing international policy [2] - The timing of the dispute coincides with Game One of the World Series in Toronto, potentially exacerbating tensions [3][4] - Tariffs and trade with China are also a point of focus, with the President scheduled to meet with Xi Jinping to discuss trade [2] - The legality of the tariffs is currently under review by the Supreme Court [3] Political Sentiment & Public Perception - The American national anthem is expected to be booed at the World Series game in Toronto, reflecting negative sentiment [4] - The situation is occurring at a time when US-Canada friendship should be celebrated [4]

Tariff Strategy & Trade Policy - The administration's entire tariff strategy is questioned if the Supreme Court doesn't rule in its favor [1] - The president possesses various other authorities, including 232s, 301s, and 338s, to implement trade policies [5][6] - Existing trade deals with Japan and Europe, covering autos, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors, are expected to remain durable [5][6] - Europe is reportedly paying the US 15% while US exporters pay zero, indicating an asymmetric trade relationship [7] - Japan has allocated $550 billion for projects aligned with the president's objectives, such as bringing semiconductor manufacturing back to the US [8] Economic Growth & Investment - Over $500 billion a year is reportedly coming in, potentially due to the president's policies [6] - CEOs have reportedly committed an additional $600 billion in investment in America [19] - The economy is projected to experience significant growth in the coming months, driven by investments in plants and factories [16][17] - The current GDP growth is at 3%, with expectations for continued growth throughout the year [17] Data Credibility & Agency Alignment - There are concerns about the credibility of jobs numbers following changes in leadership at the BLS [10] - The administration aims to remove individuals perceived as being against the president to ensure accurate data reporting [15] - The goal is to have agencies aligned with the president's agenda to provide correct numbers and support America's success [12][13]