Core Insights - Traditional investing advice suggests buying index funds and dollar cost averaging over a long period, but the S&P 500 Index contains companies that may not provide substantial value [1] - A hybrid investment strategy combining classic dividend growth stocks with Business Development Companies, REITs, and Closed End Funds can enhance investment income while achieving total returns comparable to traditional index funds [1] Investment Strategy - The approach focuses on uncovering high-quality dividend stocks and other assets that offer long-term growth potential and significant income generation [1] - The strategy aims to create a balance between growth and income, allowing investors to capture total returns on par with the S&P 500 Index [1]

Core Insights - The article discusses various stock market indices and the advantages of investing in low-cost index funds, emphasizing the importance of expense ratios in determining investment returns. Group 1: Stock Market Indices - The Russell 3000 tracks about 98% of the investable U.S. stock market, while the Russell 2000 focuses on approximately 2,000 of the smallest publicly traded companies in the U.S. [1] - The Nasdaq Composite measures the performance of over 3,000 companies on the Nasdaq stock market, known for its technology sector exposure [2] - The S&P 500 tracks around 500 of the largest companies in the U.S., making it one of the most followed indices globally [2][24] Group 2: Index Funds - Index funds are passive investment vehicles that aim to match the performance of a specific index by holding the same assets in the same proportions [3][4] - Low-cost index funds are suitable for both beginner and advanced investors, providing broad diversification and reducing risk compared to individual stock investments [6][7] - The expense ratio of an index fund indicates the percentage of an investment paid as a fee to the fund company, with low-cost funds often charging below 0.10% [8][9] Group 3: Investment Strategies - Investors should focus on long-term returns and the cost of owning index funds, aiming for the highest possible returns while minimizing fees [17] - Researching available index funds involves filtering by expense ratio and sorting by returns over various time periods [12][13] - Broadly diversified funds are recommended to reduce overall portfolio risk [15] Group 4: Low-Cost Index Funds - The article lists nine low-cost S&P 500 index funds, highlighting their expense ratios, with Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 0.015% and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index (FNILX) at 0% [24] - Investors can find low-cost funds by searching broker sites, and many funds are available as either ETFs or mutual funds [25][27] - The key differentiator among index funds tracking the same index is the cost, making it essential for investors to focus on expense ratios [30]

🌐 CoinMarketCap | CMC20 DTF 🌐You've likely heard of the CMC20 Index, the benchmark for the market's top performers. However, tracking the top 20 assets doesn't mean you have to manage 20 different positions…We built the CMC20 DTF to give you broad market exposure in a single move:🔹 One Token: Own the top 20 market leaders🔹 Auto-Rebalancing: The index adjusts automatically so you don't have to🔹 Transparent: Verify holdings and liquidity directly on the token pageCapture the whole market with just one token! ...

Group 1 - The Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund ETF (VOOG) is highlighted as a compelling investment option for those with limited funds, aiming to boost wealth over time [1][4] - Index funds, including ETFs, are designed to track specific indices, allowing investors to gain exposure to a diversified portfolio with minimal effort [2][3] - The S&P 500 index has historically averaged annual gains of close to 10%, and VOOG targets a faster-growing segment of the S&P 500 [4] Group 2 - VOOG has a low expense ratio of 0.07% and recently held shares in 140 companies, with 62% of its value concentrated in its top 10 holdings, including 14.5% in Nvidia [5] - Performance comparisons show that VOOG has a 5-year average annual return of 13.45%, a 10-year average of 17.36%, and a 15-year average of 15.39%, which are competitive against the regular S&P 500 ETF (VOO) [5]

Seven things you must do if you win the lottery from a millionaire investor. Put 20% into a lowcost total stock market index fund just like this one. Put 20% into a lowcost total bond market index fund such as this one.Put 10% into residential real estate like single family homes and another 10% in commercial real estate like warehouses. Put 20% into a highinterest savings account for security such as this one. Put 10% into blue chip crypto like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Do this and you'll make enough passive in ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 经向上海证券交易所申请，国联基金管理有限公司旗下部分上交所ETF将自2026年2月2日起变更扩位证 券简称，涉及基金及变更情况如下： ■ （1）基金代码、基金名称等其他事项保持不变。 （2）本次基金变更上述扩位证券简称的事项不涉及对基金合同、托管协议的修订，不涉及变更基金合 同当事人的权利和义务，对基金份额持有人的权益无实质性影响，不需要召开基金份额持有人大会。 （3）咨询办法：如有疑问，请拨打本基金管理人客户服务电话400-160-6000，010-56517299或登录本公 司网站（www.glfund.com）获取相关信息。 风险提示：本公司承诺以诚实信用、勤勉尽责的原则管理和运用基金资产，但不保证基金一定盈利，也 不保证最低收益。基金的过往业绩及其净值高低并不预示其未来业绩表现。基金投资有风险，投资者投 资基金前应认真阅读基金的《基金合同》、《招募说明书》等文件，了解所投资基金的风险收益特征， 并根据自身情况购买与本人风险承受能力相匹配的产品。敬请投资者留意投资风险。 特此公告。 国联基金管理有限公司 2026年1月30日 国联中证500交易型开放式指 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Schwab International Equity ETF (NYSEMKT: SCHF) is highlighted as a strong investment option for those seeking long-term returns through international equity exposure [1]. Fund Overview - The Schwab International Equity ETF is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that focuses on over 1,400 non-U.S. companies, contrasting with the S&P 500 index which includes 500 major American companies [2]. Performance Metrics - The ETF has shown impressive performance with average annual returns of 16.59% over the past 3 years, 9.39% over the past 5 years, 10.40% over the past 10 years, and 6.87% over the past 15 years [3]. Cost and Yield - The ETF features a low annual fee of 0.03%, translating to a cost of $3 per year for every $10,000 invested, and offers a solid dividend yield of 3.4% [5]. Holdings - Recent top holdings in the fund include ASML Holding, Samsung Electronics, Roche Holding, HSBC Holding, and Novartis AG, indicating a diverse portfolio of significant foreign companies [6]. Market Dynamics - The ETF is market-cap weighted, meaning larger companies have a greater influence on its performance, which can be both a risk and an advantage depending on market conditions [8].

Core Insights - The S&P 500 is experiencing unprecedented concentration, with the 10 largest companies accounting for about 40% of the index's weight, significantly above the long-term average of approximately 20% [1][2] Group 1: Market Concentration - Analysts express concern that high concentration may lead to lower S&P 500 returns over the next decade compared to a less concentrated market [2] - The top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 account for 35% of the index's earnings, making the current weight of 40% reasonable [6] Group 2: Investment Alternatives - The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF tracks the S&P 500 but weights stocks based on trailing-12-month revenue, imposing a 5% weight cap on individual stocks [3][5] - The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF measures performance by giving equal weight to all constituents, eliminating concentration risk entirely [8][9] Group 3: Performance and Fees - The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF has returned 545% since its inception in 2008, while the S&P 500 has returned 630%, indicating potential for continued underperformance due to concentration risk [6][10] - The Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF has a relatively high expense ratio of 0.39%, while the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF has a lower expense ratio of 0.2%, making it a more cost-effective option for investors seeking exposure without concentration risk [7][11]

Core Insights - The introduction of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in Canada in 1990 and their debut in the U.S. in 1993 marked a significant development in investment options, with the first U.S. ETF being the SPDR S&P 500 ETF [1][2] Growth of ETFs - ETFs have seen explosive growth, with a record $1.5 trillion invested in them in 2025, largely due to their nature as index funds and ease of trading [2] Investment Options - Vanguard is highlighted as a leading provider of ETFs, known for low fees and a variety of options suitable for different investor objectives [3][9] Broad-Market Index Funds - Key broad-market index funds include: - Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) with a 1.13% dividend yield and 5-year average annual return of 14.76% - Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) with a 1.12% dividend yield and 5-year average annual return of 13.41% - Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) with a 1.83% dividend yield and 5-year average annual return of 11.24% [5][6] Dividend and Income ETFs - ETFs focused on income through dividends include: - Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) with a 3.86% yield and a 5-year average annual return of (0.27%) - Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) with a 1.62% yield and a 5-year average annual return of 11.67% - Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF (VYM) with a 2.44% yield and a 5-year average annual return of 12.72% [8][10]

Core Insights - The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) and the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) serve distinct purposes in a diversified investment strategy, with SPY focusing on large-cap U.S. companies and IWM on small-cap domestic stocks [1][2] Cost & Size Comparison - SPY has a lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to IWM's 0.19%, making it more attractive for fee-conscious investors [3] - As of December 31, 2025, SPY has a one-year return of 16.57% while IWM's is 12.04% [3] - SPY also offers a slightly higher dividend yield of 1.06% compared to IWM's 0.97% [3] - SPY has significantly higher assets under management (AUM) at $701 billion versus IWM's $72 billion [3] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, SPY has shown stronger cumulative growth, with a growth of $1,843 from an initial investment of $1,000, compared to IWM's $1,259 [4] - SPY has a max drawdown of -24.50%, while IWM's max drawdown is -31.91%, indicating that SPY has experienced shallower losses during downturns [4] - IWM has a higher beta of 1.30 compared to SPY's beta of 1.00, reflecting greater volatility associated with small-cap stocks [3][4] Holdings Composition - SPY tracks the S&P 500 Index, holding 503 large-cap U.S. stocks, with a significant sector tilt towards technology (35%), financial services (13%), and communication services (11%) [5] - The top three holdings in SPY—Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft—account for over 20% of its assets [5] - IWM, on the other hand, holds 1,961 small-cap stocks, with no single stock dominating its portfolio; its largest sectors are healthcare, financial services, and technology [6] - The top holdings in IWM—Credo Technology Group, Bloom Energy, and Fabrinet—represent less than 3% of total assets [6] Investment Implications - Large-cap stocks, represented by SPY, tend to be more stable during market volatility, while small-cap stocks, represented by IWM, can offer greater potential for explosive growth but come with higher volatility [8][9] - The recent performance of large companies, such as Nvidia, has led to SPY outperforming IWM in both 12-month and five-year total returns [10] - Investing in both large-cap and small-cap segments can help diversify a portfolio, although small-cap stocks may be more susceptible to price fluctuations [11]