Solana Network Performance - Solana's Alpenglow upgrade is expected in early 2026, targeting 100ms finality [1] - This finality is projected to be 120x faster than Ethereum's 12-second blocks [1] DeFi Implications - Phoenix and Drift can potentially operate order books with latency comparable to centralized exchanges (CEX) [1] - Solana aims to eliminate the need for separate CEX and DEX strategies for market makers [1] - DeFi protocols designed for 400ms latency could experience a 4x speed improvement [1]

Technology Improvement - Solana's read layer achieves 10x lower latency [1] - The system requires 100x fewer RPC calls [1] - The codebase is reduced by 1000x [1]

Solana Data Redesign - Solana 历史/存档数据已被重新设计，旨在解决最大的数据/RPC问题 [1] - 新设计旨在将延迟降低 10 倍，RPC 调用减少 100 倍，代码减少 1000 倍 [1] Technical Improvements - 查询历史数据（getBlock/getTransaction/getSignaturesForAddress）不再直接访问 Google BigTable [1]

User Experience & Performance - Users prioritize the capacity and latency improvements that chains can achieve, leading to better apps and UX [1] - Chains settling to Ethereum can offer performance identical to any L1 but with reduced overhead (consensus) [1] Security & Trust - While chains aim for security parity or improvement over time, this is not the primary concern for users [2] - Existing L2s have a permissioned multisig that can override the bridge contract without notice [2] - Escape hatch is a property of the bridge, not the L2 itself [2] Technical Feasibility - There is no engineering blocker to build a bridge on Solana [2]

Performance Upgrade - Sei Giga 升级将实现低于 400 毫秒的最终确认时间，以及每秒 5 Gigagas 的吞吐量（约 20 万 TPS）[1] - Sei Labs 工程师发现了节点运营商延迟优化方案，可带来 10 到 40 倍的性能提升 [1] Technical Analysis - Sei Labs 在准备 Sei Giga 升级时，使用不同的状态存储后端对节点性能进行了基准测试 [1] - 在比较 RocksDB 和带有 MVCC 的 PebbleDB 用于索引繁重的历史查询时，RocksDB 能够将节点运营商延迟降低 10 到 40 倍 [2]

RT nick | helius.dev (@nick_pennie)ok fine@heliuslabs stats from yesterday- 100k+ peak TPS- 99.999% uptime- no change in latencycombo that with our 24/7 support and there's simply no better optiontldr: put your marketing department to work instead of your engineers https://t.co/x1t6x9z2xY ...

Custom Solutions - A small percentage of hyper latency sensitive users could benefit from a custom solution [1] - Dedicated node for YS gRPC streaming from Helius can be pointed to shreds for quicker data [1] Performance Improvement - Shaving off approximately 0.5 milliseconds in data processing time is possible [1] Risk Consideration - The custom solution is not fault tolerant, unlike Laserstream [1]

Technology & Scalability - Starknet 被 Extended 选择，因为它满足了吞吐量和延迟的要求 [1] - Starknet 是唯一满足 Extended 需求的 L2 解决方案 [1]

Technology Selection - Extended chose Starknet due to its superior throughput and latency capabilities compared to other Layer 2 solutions [1] - Starknet is the only L2 that meets Extended's specific requirements [1]

Solana技术特性 - Solana当前区块时间技术上为 400 毫秒，开发者可实现更快速度 [1] - 基于初步测试，交易发送到在Helius shreds中观察到交易的端到端延迟约为 70 毫秒 [1] - 该测试为初步脚本，可能可以更快，需要考虑跳过率 [1]