Core Insights - Schwab is recognized as a leading provider of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), offering passive exposure to various asset classes including equities and fixed income [1][2] ETF Offerings - Schwab's fund offerings are extensive, covering nearly every index, sector, trend, and asset class, making it a versatile choice for investors [2] - Three notable ETFs from Schwab include: - Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) - Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) - Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) [7] Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) - SCHB tracks the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, encompassing over 2,400 stocks across virtually all sectors, providing significant diversification [4][6] - The ETF features an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%, which is among the lowest in the market, maximizing cost efficiency for investors [5] - SCHB has a low turnover rate and offers a payout ratio of around 30%, resulting in a dividend yield of 1.1%, which is competitive compared to other index funds [6]

Core Insights - The iShares Core S&P Total US Stock Market ETF (ITOT) and the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) provide low-cost, diversified U.S. equity exposure but differ in fund size, number of holdings, and sector weightings [1][2] Cost & Size Comparison - Both ITOT and VTI have an expense ratio of 0.03% and similar dividend yields, with ITOT at 1.09% and VTI at 1.11% [3] - As of January 3, 2025, ITOT has a one-year return of 14.69%, while VTI has a return of 14.76% [3] - ITOT has assets under management (AUM) of $80 billion, whereas VTI has a significantly larger AUM of $567 billion [3] Performance & Risk Comparison - The maximum drawdown over five years for ITOT is -25.35%, while VTI is slightly higher at -25.36% [4] - A $1,000 investment would grow to $1,730 in ITOT and $1,728 in VTI over five years, indicating very similar performance [4] Holdings & Sector Exposure - VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index and holds 3,527 stocks, with technology making up 35% of its assets, followed by financial services at 13% and consumer cyclical at 11% [5] - ITOT holds 2,498 stocks, with a sector allocation of 34% in technology, 13% in financial services, and 10% in consumer cyclical [6] - Both ETFs avoid leverage, currency hedging, or ESG screens, maintaining straightforward investment strategies [6] Investor Considerations - VTI offers greater diversification due to its larger number of holdings, making it more suitable for investors seeking maximum market exposure [8] - The larger AUM of VTI provides greater liquidity, allowing for larger transactions without significantly impacting the ETF's price [9] - Overall, both funds are nearly indistinguishable in terms of fees and performance, with AUM and number of holdings being the primary differentiators [11]

Core Insights - The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is considered an ideal buy-and-hold investment due to its broad diversification and low expense ratio of 0.03% [1][4] - VTI invests in approximately 3,500 U.S. companies across all market capitalizations, making it a cornerstone investment for various portfolios [4][5] - The ETF's exposure to small-cap stocks, which have underperformed recently, presents potential for improved returns and reduced overall portfolio risk [6][8] Investment Strategy - The current U.S. stock market is nearing all-time highs, prompting a cautious approach towards growth and tech stocks, suggesting a shift in focus may be necessary [1][7] - VTI offers exposure to sectors like financials, healthcare, and industrials, which are not as heavily represented in tech-focused ETFs, thus providing a more balanced investment strategy [8] - The inclusion of small-cap stocks in VTI's portfolio allows for potential value opportunities that could yield long-term benefits [9]

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) highlights their differing approaches to dividend investing, with HDV focusing on defensive sectors and higher yields, while VYM offers broader diversification and lower costs [5][6]. Group 1: Fund Characteristics - HDV consists of 74 stocks with a sector focus on consumer defensive (28%), energy (24%), and healthcare (17%), featuring major positions in Exxon Mobil Corp., Johnson & Johnson, and Chevron Corp. [1] - VYM tracks a high-dividend index with 589 holdings, emphasizing financial services (21%), technology (18%), and healthcare (13%), with significant investments in Broadcom, JPMorgan Chase, and Exxon Mobil Corp. [2] - HDV has a higher dividend yield compared to VYM, but its higher expense ratio may reduce net income for investors [3][7]. Group 2: Performance and Risk - HDV is characterized by lower volatility and a lower maximum drawdown, making it suitable for risk-averse investors [7]. - VYM's larger number of holdings provides greater diversification, which can mitigate risks associated with downturns in specific sectors [8]. - VYM has a larger asset under management (AUM) of $84.5 billion, enhancing its liquidity compared to HDV [8]. Group 3: Investor Preferences - VYM is recommended for investors prioritizing diversification, lower costs, and stronger total returns over high dividend yields [9]. - HDV is more appealing to those who prioritize receiving the highest dividend yield with reduced volatility [9].

分组1 - The individual has over 10 years of experience in Financial Services, starting their investment journey in 2008 and working in New York before relocating to North Carolina [1] - The investment strategy focuses on quality, diversification, and long-term growth, avoiding high-risk pursuits and uncomprehended advice [1] - The portfolio includes a variety of assets such as broad market ETFs (DIA, VOO, QQQM), sector funds (XLE, IXC), alternatives like Bitcoin and Gold, and stocks including JPM, MCD, and WMT [1] 分组2 - The individual contributes to the CEF/ETF Income Laboratory, which specializes in macro analysis and managed income portfolios targeting approximately 8% yields [1] - The CEF/ETF Income Laboratory features include high-yield opportunities, monthly-paying holdings for steady income, and resources for both active and passive investors [1]

Core Insights - The article compares iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF (ICF) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ), highlighting VNQ's lower cost, broader portfolio, and higher yield, while ICF has a more concentrated focus and has slightly outperformed VNQ in five-year growth [2][10]. Cost and Size Comparison - ICF has an expense ratio of 0.32% and assets under management (AUM) of $1.9 billion, while VNQ has a lower expense ratio of 0.13% and AUM of $65.4 billion [4]. - VNQ offers a higher dividend yield of 3.86% compared to ICF's 2.49% [5][12]. Performance Comparison - Over five years, a $1,000 investment in ICF grew to $1,261, while the same investment in VNQ grew to $1,254 [6]. - Since 2004, VNQ has delivered annualized total returns of 7.2%, compared to ICF's 6.9% [11]. Portfolio Composition - VNQ holds 158 positions with top holdings in Welltower Inc., Prologis Inc., and American Tower Corp., providing diversified sector exposure [7]. - ICF is more concentrated with only 30 holdings, where its top ten stocks account for nearly 60% of its portfolio, increasing single-stock risk [8][12]. Investor Implications - VNQ's lower expense ratio and higher dividend yield make it more appealing for income-focused investors [10]. - Both funds have similar volatility levels, but VNQ's better returns and diversification may offer more potential for long-term growth [11][12].

Core Insights - Uber Technologies (UBER) is reportedly in discussions to acquire parking startup SpotHero, which would enable Uber to offer reserved parking for drivers [1][10] - SpotHero, valued at approximately $290 million, operates in over 400 North American cities, allowing users to reserve parking spaces [2] - The acquisition would diversify Uber's revenue streams beyond its core ride-hailing business [2] Group 1: Business Expansion and Diversification - Uber has diversified its operations over time, expanding into food delivery and freight services, which is crucial for mitigating risks [3] - Recent partnerships, such as with ALDI, enhance Uber Eats by providing a selection of fresh groceries for delivery, further broadening its service offerings [4][10] - The acquisition of Dantaxi last year has positioned Uber as a leading mobility platform in Denmark, showcasing its commitment to growth through strategic acquisitions [4] Group 2: Financial Performance and Valuation - Uber's shares have increased by 26.5% over the past year, underperforming compared to the Zacks Internet-Services industry's growth of 58.9% [5] - The company trades at a 12-month forward price-to-sales ratio of 2.82X, which is considered inexpensive relative to its industry and competitor DoorDash [8] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Uber's earnings has shown positive revisions over the past 60 days, indicating an upward trend in earnings expectations [11]

Core Insights - The iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) focuses on over 1,000 small-cap growth stocks, while the Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) concentrates on just 69 mega-cap stocks, primarily in the technology sector [1][2][4][5] Fund Characteristics - IWO has sector weights of 25% in technology, 22% in healthcare, and 21% in industrials, with top holdings like Credo Technology Group, Bloom Energy, and Fabrinet each accounting for just over 1% of assets [1] - MGK has a striking 71% allocation to technology, with top holdings including Apple, NVIDIA, and Microsoft, which collectively make up over a third of the fund [2][5] Performance and Risk - MGK has delivered stronger five-year returns and shallower drawdowns compared to IWO, but its heavy tilt towards technology makes it vulnerable to sector downturns [5][7][8] - IWO offers greater diversification, which can cushion against downturns in specific sectors, but it carries higher risk due to its focus on small-cap stocks [8] Cost and Fees - MGK is more affordable than IWO, with an expense ratio that is 0.17 percentage points lower, although IWO offers a slightly higher dividend yield [3][5] Investment Strategy - The choice between IWO and MGK depends on investor preferences for diversification versus concentration, with IWO appealing to those seeking broader exposure and MGK to those favoring established tech giants [4][8]

monsitj / iStock via Getty Images Quick Read BTAL gained 19% in 2022 when the S&P 500 fell 18%. The fund lost 22.8% in 2025 while the S&P 500 gained 17.2%. Over the past decade BTAL declined 23% while the S&P 500 surged 241%. A recent study identified one single habit that doubled Americans’ retirement savings and moved retirement from dream, to reality. Read more here. When high-beta stocks stumble and markets turn volatile, AGFiQ U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (NYSEARCA:BTAL) is designed ...

Core Insights - The Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) represent two distinct investment strategies, with VTV focusing on large-cap value companies and VTI providing comprehensive market exposure across all capitalizations [2] Cost & Size Comparison - VTV has an expense ratio of 0.04% and VTI has a slightly lower expense ratio of 0.03% - As of December 31, 2025, VTV's one-year return was 13.32% while VTI's was 15.53% - VTV offers a dividend yield of 2.05%, nearly double that of VTI at 1.11% - VTV has a beta of 0.76, indicating lower volatility compared to VTI's beta of 1.04 - VTV's assets under management (AUM) stand at $216 billion, while VTI's AUM is significantly larger at $2 trillion [3][4] Performance & Risk Analysis - Over the past five years, VTV experienced a maximum drawdown of -17.03%, compared to VTI's -25.37% - An investment of $1,000 in VTV would have grown to $1,624, while the same investment in VTI would have grown to $1,734 [5] Portfolio Composition - VTI includes over 3,500 stocks, reflecting the entire CRSP US Total Market Index, with technology comprising 35% of its assets, followed by financial services and consumer cyclicals; major holdings include Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft [6] - VTV is concentrated with only 315 holdings, primarily in financials, healthcare, and industrials, featuring top positions in JPMorgan Chase, Berkshire Hathaway, and Johnson & Johnson; it excludes most growth stocks and smaller companies, contributing to its lower beta and higher dividend yield [7] Investment Implications - VTI offers maximum diversification across the entire U.S. stock market, while VTV focuses solely on large-cap value stocks, which are perceived as undervalued [9]