Core Viewpoint - The Zhejiang Regulatory Bureau of the National Financial Supervision Administration has imposed fines on Sunshine Property Insurance Co., Ltd. and its related entities for various violations, including improper use of approved insurance terms and fictitious insurance intermediary business to extract fees [1]. Group 1: Violations and Penalties - Sunshine Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Branch and its responsible persons were fined 400,000 yuan for not using approved or filed insurance terms and rates [1]. - Sunshine Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Taizhou Central Branch and its responsible persons were fined 130,000 yuan for using insurance agents to fabricate intermediary business to extract fees, with an additional warning and fine of 40,000 yuan for Zhang Minghui [1]. - Sunshine Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Hangzhou Central Branch and its responsible persons were also fined 130,000 yuan for similar violations involving fictitious intermediary business, with a warning and fine of 40,000 yuan for Zhou Jiutian [1].

凤凰网财经讯 8月20日，据国家金融监管总局官网消息显示，和谐健康保险金华中心支公司因编制或者提供虚假报告、报表、文件、资料，被 罚款10万元。 相关责任人张长锋，被警告并罚款1万元。 | 序号 | 当事人名称 | 主要违法违规行为 | 行政处罚内容 | 作出决定机关 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 和谐健康保险股 | | 对和谐健康保险股 | | | | 份有限公司金华 | 编制或者提供虚假报 | 份有限公司金华中 | 国家金融监督管 | | | 中心支公司及相 | 告、报表、文件、资 | 心支公司罚款10万 | 理总局金华监管 | | | 关责任人 | 彩 | 元;对张长锋警告 | 分局 | | | | | 并罚款1万元。 | | ...

| 序 | 当事人名称 | 行政处罚决 | 主要违法违规行为 | 行政处罚 | 作出决定 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 름 | | 定书文号 | | 内容 | 机关 | | 1 | 阳光财产保 险股份有限 任城区支公 | 济金罚决字 름 | | | 国家金融 | | | 公司济宁市 | (2025) 5 | | 罚款6万元 | 监督管理 | | | | | | | 总局济宁 | | | 司 | | | | 监管分局 | | | | | 虚构中介业务套取 | | | | | 田克(时任 阳光财产保 | 济金罚决字 (2025) 6 | 费用 | | 国家金融 | | | 险股份有限 | | | 警告并罚 | 监督管理 | | 2 | 公司济宁市 | 글 | | 款1万元 | 总局济宁 | | | 任城区支公 | | | | 监管分局 | | | 司经理) | | | | | （责任编辑：蔡情） 中国经济网北京4月23日讯 国家金融监督管理总局近日披露的济宁监管分局行政处罚信息公开表 （济金罚决字〔2025〕5号-6号）显示，阳光财产保险股份有限公司济宁市任城 ...

Core Viewpoint - China Dadi Property Insurance Co., Ltd. was fined a total of 4.73 million yuan for multiple regulatory violations, including improper use of approved insurance terms and rates, providing benefits outside of the insurance contract, inaccurate financial and business data, and poor customer information management [1] Group 1: Regulatory Violations - The company failed to use approved or filed insurance terms and rates as required [1] - The company provided benefits to policyholders that were not stipulated in the insurance contracts [1] - There were inaccuracies in the company's financial and business data [1] - The management of customer information was not compliant with regulations [1] Group 2: Penalties - The total fine imposed on China Dadi Property Insurance Co., Ltd. was 4.73 million yuan, with an additional 200,000 yuan fine on its Jiangxi branch [1] - A total of 19 responsible individuals were warned and fined a combined total of 1.15 million yuan [1][2]

Core Viewpoint - Zhejiang Financial Regulatory Bureau has imposed penalties on China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd. for illegal activities related to providing rebates or other benefits to policyholders outside of the insurance contract terms [1][2]. Group 1: Company Actions - China Pacific Property Insurance Co., Ltd. Xiaoshan Branch was fined 220,000 yuan for violating regulations by offering rebates or other benefits to policyholders [1][2]. - Zheng Zhouzhong, a responsible individual, received a warning and a fine of 70,000 yuan for his involvement in the violations [1][2].