Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around President Trump's threats to impose tariffs on European countries opposing the acquisition of Greenland, which has led to increased market speculation regarding the potential acquisition of Greenland by the U.S. [1][2] Group 2 - Following Trump's announcement, U.S. stock index futures fell, with the European Stoxx 50 index futures dropping by 1.2% and the S&P 500 index futures down by 0.8% [2] - As traders shifted towards safe-haven assets, the prices of gold and silver surged to historical highs [2] Group 3 - Predictions regarding the U.S. acquiring part of Greenland have increased, with Kalshi reporting an implied probability of nearly 42% by January 21, 2029, up from 26% in early December [1] - Market pricing on Polymarket indicates a 23% probability of the U.S. acquiring part of Greenland by 2026, while PredictIt shows a 33% chance of partial acquisition and only a 10% chance of acquiring the entire territory [1]

据报道，贝肯接受《奥马哈世界先驱报》采访时表示，"许多共和党人对此非常愤怒。如果他真的付诸行动，我认为这将终结他的总统任期。"当被问及是否 支持因格陵兰问题弹劾特朗普时，贝肯说，"我倾向于支持"。 贝肯称，侵占格陵兰岛这一想法"简直荒诞可笑"。他还警告说，特朗普发出的威胁可能会破坏众议院共和党的团结。 【环球网报道】据《今日美国报》15日报道，美国共和党籍众议员唐·贝肯就格陵兰岛问题公开批评美国总统特朗普，他认为，美国侵占格陵兰岛是一个"灾 难性想法"，这可能导致特朗普被弹劾。 当地时间14日，美国副总统万斯和国务卿鲁比奥在华盛顿与到访的丹麦外交大臣拉斯穆森和格陵兰岛自治政府外长莫茨费尔特举行会谈，讨论格陵兰岛的未 来。拉斯穆森在会晤后强调，美国"收购"格陵兰岛"绝对没有必要"，不尊重丹麦领土完整和格陵兰岛人民自决权的观点"完全不可接受"，双方仍然存在"根 本性分歧"，但将继续对话，并决定组建高级别工作组。 《今日美国报》称，贝肯最近发表的言论并非是他首次对特朗普的格陵兰岛外交政策发起抨击，他也不是唯一一名批评特朗普做法的共和党议员。贝肯在1 月6日接受采访时表示，希望其他共和党议员能挺身而出"一致反对"特朗 ...

欧盟国防事务专员库比柳斯表示，如果格陵兰岛的北约盟友不得不保护该岛免受美国占领企图的侵 害，"欧洲将被迫与美国对抗"。 当地时间周三（14日），丹麦外交大臣拉斯穆森（Lars Løkke Rasmussen）在华盛顿表示，当天与美国 副总统万斯以及国务卿鲁比奥的会谈之后，丹麦与特朗普政府在格陵兰问题上仍然存在"根本分歧"。 拉斯穆森表示，尽管当天的会谈坦率且具有建设性，但"任何不尊重丹麦王国领土完整、也不尊重格陵 兰人民自决权的想法，都是完全不可接受的"。他补充说："我们依然存在根本性的分歧，但我们也同意 彼此保留不同意见。" 据拉斯穆森称，三方高级别工作组已经成立，"旨在探讨我们是否能找到共同的前进道路"。他表示，预 计该工作组将在几周内举行首次会议。 "我们认为，该工作组应着重探讨如何在解决美国安全关切的同时，尊重丹麦王国的底线。"拉斯穆森与 格陵兰岛自治政府外交部长莫茨费尔特当天一同表示。 万斯突然亲自主持会议 拉斯穆森表示，在周三的白宫会议上，他驳斥了特朗普"如果格陵兰岛归美国所有"的言论，并称此次会 议主要聚焦于安全问题。"我认为，如果我们想要进行一场适当的辩论，（安全问题）是必不可少 的。"拉斯穆 ...

Core Viewpoint - Greenland's political leaders have expressed a strong desire for the U.S. to cease its "disrespect" towards Greenland, emphasizing that they do not wish to become American citizens [1][5]. Group 1: Political Reactions - Greenland's political leaders issued a joint statement asserting that the future of Greenland should be determined by its people, urging the U.S. to stop its disrespectful actions [1][5]. - The EU, along with the UK and Germany, has voiced support for Denmark and Greenland, stating that any changes regarding Greenland's status should be decided by Greenland and Denmark [1][2]. - The U.S. Secretary of State indicated that President Trump prefers to purchase Greenland rather than invade it, although Greenland and Denmark have reiterated that Greenland is "not for sale" [5][6]. Group 2: Historical Context - President Trump's interest in acquiring Greenland is not unprecedented; historical attempts to purchase Greenland date back to the 19th century, including proposals from U.S. administrations in 1946 and 1955 that were ultimately rejected by Denmark [6][8]. - The U.S. has previously purchased territories from Denmark, such as the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1917, indicating a historical precedent for such transactions [6][8]. Group 3: Military Presence and Implications - The U.S. maintains a significant military presence in Greenland, with a base established under a 1951 agreement allowing for additional defense areas [8]. - Analysts suggest that if the U.S. were to attempt to occupy Greenland, it could do so with minimal resistance, raising concerns about potential violations of NATO agreements [8][9]. - Discussions are ongoing regarding a potential "Compact of Free Association" (COFA) that would require Greenland to separate from Denmark, which is currently not legally feasible [9].