Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry's office in Hong Kong expressed strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to the G7 foreign ministers and the EU's interference in Hong Kong's judicial matters regarding the conviction of Jimmy Lai, labeling their statements as a gross violation of China's internal affairs [1][2] - The spokesperson emphasized that Jimmy Lai has long acted as a pawn for external forces to disrupt Hong Kong, with clear evidence of his crimes related to inciting subversion and endangering national security [1] - The entire trial process of the Lai case was described as open and transparent, with both sides presenting sufficient evidence, leading to a verdict based solely on factual evidence, which has received widespread support from various sectors of Hong Kong society [1] Group 2 - The spokesperson highlighted that today's China has moved past the humiliating history of being trampled by foreign powers, and Hong Kong is now on a prosperous path towards governance and development [2] - The statement criticized the collective pressure from foreign nations as futile attempts to make China yield, comparing it to a weak insect trying to shake a tree, which will ultimately result in disgrace for those nations [2]

Group 1 - The Hong Kong High Court has convicted Jimmy Lai of colluding with foreign forces and inciting publications, reaffirming a zero-tolerance stance against actions that threaten national security [1][2] - The trial lasted 156 days, examining 2,220 pieces of evidence and over 80,000 pages of documents, with a judgment rationale of 855 pages made publicly available [2] - The conviction is seen as a demonstration of the rule of law in Hong Kong, maintaining core values and ensuring that any actions against national security will face legal consequences [2][3] Group 2 - Various political and social organizations in Hong Kong view the ruling as a clear warning to those attempting to undermine national security, emphasizing that such actions will not be tolerated [3][4] - The case is considered a significant precedent for future national security cases, showcasing the maturity and confidence of Hong Kong's judicial system in upholding national security [5][6] - The public sentiment reflects a strong consensus on the necessity of reinforcing national security laws to protect the community and ensure the stability of the "One Country, Two Systems" principle [6]

Group 1 - The Hong Kong High Court convicted Jimmy Lai of colluding with foreign forces and inciting publications that threaten national security, reflecting a zero-tolerance stance towards such activities [1][2] - The trial lasted 156 days, examining 2,220 pieces of evidence and over 80,000 pages of documents, with a judgment rationale of 855 pages made publicly available [2] - The conviction is seen as a reaffirmation of the rule of law in Hong Kong, emphasizing that legal principles will be upheld and violations will be punished [2][3] Group 2 - The case serves as a warning against actions that undermine national security, with various political groups asserting that the ruling reinforces the importance of maintaining social stability [3][4] - The conviction is viewed as a significant step in implementing the Hong Kong National Security Law, showcasing the judicial system's capability to handle national security cases effectively [5][6] - Public sentiment reflects a consensus that maintaining national security is essential for the well-being of Hong Kong's 7.5 million residents, ensuring the stability of the "one country, two systems" principle [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong High Court has ruled that pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai is guilty of colluding with foreign forces, reinforcing the central government's support for the region's legal system and national security measures [1] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Hong Kong High Court's decision on December 15 confirms the charges against Jimmy Lai for conspiracy to collude with foreign forces [1] - The ruling emphasizes the importance of maintaining law and order in Hong Kong, reflecting the judicial system's commitment to upholding national security [1] Group 2: Government Response - The spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry expressed strong dissatisfaction and opposition to foreign nations that criticize Hong Kong's judicial system [1] - The Chinese government urges foreign countries to respect China's sovereignty and refrain from interfering in Hong Kong's legal matters [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) government, supported by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, firmly backs the legal ruling against Jimmy Lai for colluding with external forces and endangering national security, emphasizing that the case is unrelated to "freedom of the press" [1][2] Group 1 - The Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed strong dissatisfaction and condemnation towards the interference from countries like the UK, Australia, the US, Germany, and the EU regarding the legal ruling against Jimmy Lai [1] - The spokesperson highlighted that Hong Kong is a society governed by the rule of law, where everyone is equal before the law, and no one has privileges above it [1] - The spokesperson characterized Jimmy Lai as a key planner and participant in anti-China activities, labeling him as an "agent" of external anti-China forces whose actions severely threaten national security [1] Group 2 - The spokesperson asserted that the judicial case is an internal matter of the HKSAR and should not be interfered with by external parties [2] - The spokesperson criticized the double standards of certain countries and politicians who, while defending their own national security laws, attempt to label Hong Kong's legal actions as "suppressing freedom" [1][2] - The Ministry urged relevant countries and politicians to recognize the reality and cease their interference in Hong Kong affairs and China's internal matters [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to certain countries commenting on Hong Kong's law enforcement actions against individuals involved in subversive activities [1] Group 1: Government Response - The Foreign Ministry supports the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) government in fulfilling its legal duties and backs the Hong Kong police in their law enforcement actions [1] - The ministry emphasizes that Hong Kong affairs are purely China's internal matters and urges foreign countries to respect China's sovereignty and the rule of law in Hong Kong [1] Group 2: International Relations - The Foreign Ministry calls for foreign nations to stop providing support to individuals who undermine stability in Hong Kong [1]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong strongly opposes foreign politicians' interference in Hong Kong's national security laws and cases, emphasizing the importance of the rule of law and stability in Hong Kong [1]. Group 1: National Security Law - The Hong Kong National Security Law strengthens the foundation of "one country, two systems," enhancing social stability and legal certainty in Hong Kong [1]. - Under the protection of the National Security Law, social order is maintained, justice is served, and the legal rights of citizens and the business environment are better safeguarded [1]. Group 2: Rule of Law - The core principle of the rule of law is that laws must be followed and violations must be punished, with no one enjoying privileges outside the law [1]. - The judicial authorities in the Special Administrative Region exercise their judicial power independently, ensuring fair and just procedures [1]. Group 3: Foreign Interference - The spokesperson criticizes foreign politicians for ignoring their own national security laws and human rights records while attempting to interfere in Hong Kong's legal matters, revealing their hypocritical double standards [1]. - There is a call for these politicians to recognize the facts and cease any form of interference in Hong Kong affairs and China's internal matters [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry's Office in Hong Kong strongly opposes the recent threats from certain U.S. senators regarding sanctions against Chinese and Hong Kong officials, asserting that such intimidation will not shake China's determination to maintain national security [1][2] Group 1: Response to U.S. Actions - The Chinese Foreign Ministry's Office expresses strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition to the proposed "Hong Kong Sanctions Act" by U.S. senators, which threatens sanctions against central government officials and Hong Kong judicial personnel [1] - The spokesperson emphasizes that under the protection of the National Security Law, social order in Hong Kong is stable, the rule of law is upheld, and citizens' legal rights are better protected [1] - The statement condemns U.S. politicians for attempting to interfere in Hong Kong affairs and China's internal matters, labeling their actions as blatant coercion and bullying [1] Group 2: Commitment to National Security - The spokesperson reaffirms China's unwavering commitment to the "One Country, Two Systems" principle and the determination to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests [1] - The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) government also condemns the U.S. senators' actions, asserting that the judicial and law enforcement departments have acted strictly according to the law since the implementation of the National Security Law [2] - The HKSAR government emphasizes that it will not be intimidated by threats and will steadfastly maintain national security, urging the U.S. to cease interference in China's internal affairs [2]