据外交部驻香港特派员公署2月14日消息，2026年2月11日和12日，外交部驻港公署约见英国、美国、澳 大利亚等国和欧盟驻港机构负责人，针对其官方和政客就黎智英案量刑裁决发表负面言论提出严正交 涉，表达强烈不满和坚决反对，敦促上述国家、组织及有关政客切实尊重中国主权和香港法治，立即停 止对香港国安案件审理发表不负责任言论，立即停止以任何形式干预香港事务、干涉中国内政。 李友志同志逝世 ...

"我要再次强调，香港事务纯属中国内政，香港法治不容撼动，任何外国无权说三道四。中国政府维护 国家主权、安全、发展利益的决心坚定不移，贯彻'一国两制'方针的决心坚定不移。一切破坏香港由治 及兴进程、妄想乱港遏华的图谋都绝不可能得逞。"林剑说，中方敦促有关方面尊重中国主权，恪守国 际法原则和国际关系基本准则，立即停止以任何方式插手香港事务、干涉中国内政。 转自：衢州日报 林剑说，黎智英是一系列重大反中乱港事件的主要策划者和参与者，其危害国家安全犯罪事实清楚、罪 证确凿。香港特区司法机关依据事实和法律作出裁决，合法正当、不容置喙。 （来源：衢州日报） 林剑表示，香港是法治社会，有法必依、违法必究是基本原则，任何人都不能打着"民主""自由"的旗号 从事违法犯罪活动并企图逃脱法律制裁。 新华社北京2月10日电 （记者 董雪 吴梦桐） 针对美国、英国、澳大利亚、欧盟等方面就黎智英案发表 声明，外交部发言人林剑10日在例行记者会上答问时说，个别国家和机构借香港特区司法案件恶意抹黑 香港、诋毁香港法治、干涉中国内政，中方对此坚决反对，已向有关国家和机构提出严正交涉。 ...

林剑表示，黎智英是一系列重大反中乱港事件的主要策划者和参与者，其危害国家安全犯罪事实清楚、 罪证确凿，香港特区司法机关依据事实和法律作出裁决，合法正当、不容置喙。香港是法治社会，有法 必依、违法必究是基本原则，任何人都不能打着"民主自由"的旗号从事违法犯罪活动，并企图逃脱法律 制裁。 【环球时报-环球网报道 记者 索炎琦】外交部发言人林剑主持2月10日例行记者会。会上有记者提问 称：针对香港特区高等法院判处黎智英20年监禁，美国、英国、澳大利亚、欧盟等方面发表声明，对上 述判决表示关切，请问中方对此有何回应？ 林剑对此表示，个别国家和机构借香港特区的司法案件恶意抹黑香港，诋毁香港法治，干涉中国内政。 中方对此坚决反对，已向有关国家和机构提出严正交涉。 林剑表示，我要再次强调，香港事务纯属中国内政，香港法治不容撼动，任何外国无权说三道四。中国 政府维护国家主权安全发展利益的决心坚定不移，贯彻"一国两制"方针的决心坚定不移，一切破坏香港 由治及兴进程、妄想乱港遏华的图谋都绝不可能得逞。我们敦促有关方面尊重中国主权，恪守国际法原 则和国际关系基本准则，立即停止以任何方式插手香港事务，干涉中国内政。 ...

新华社香港2月9日电 2月9日，反中乱港分子黎智英与苹果日报3家公司违反香港国安法等案件在香港量 刑裁决。香港特区高等法院宣判，黎智英因两项串谋勾结外国势力罪及一项串谋发布煽动刊物罪被判监 禁20年。这是对黎智英反中乱港罪行的公正清算，是广大香港市民的民心所向，是捍卫与彰显香港法治 的必要之举。这项判决结果再次昭示：任何勾结外国势力危害国家安全的行径，必将在铁证面前无处遁 形；任何披着各种外衣出卖国家和香港利益的人，终将受到严厉惩治、付出应有代价。 黎智英所作所为，严重冲击"一国两制"原则底线，严重危害国家安全，严重破坏香港繁荣稳定，严重损 害市民利益福祉。以黎智英为首的反中乱港分子，对香港、对国家干尽各种坏事，成为妨碍"一国两 制"行稳致远和香港长治久安的祸患。此患不除，香港不宁。自黎智英被香港警方依法拘捕以来，香港 市民有的集会请愿、言辞恳切，有的投书媒体、仗义执言，纷纷要求彻查其罪行，将这个甘当外部势 力"走狗""爪牙"的汉奸国贼绳之以法。正如一位特区立法会议员所言，黎智英勾结外国势力，损害国家 利益、香港利益，涉及的犯罪行为在西方国家包括美英都属于重罪，"受到严惩才能彰显法律公义"。 2023年12月 ...

2023年12月18日，黎智英涉嫌违反香港国安法案正式开审。历经156天公开聆讯，2025年12月15日，香 港特区高等法院作出裁决，黎智英两项串谋勾结外国势力罪及一项串谋发布煽动刊物罪成立。长达855 页的罪成判词、2220件证物、超过8万页文件、14名控方证人证词，充分证明：黎智英祸乱香港、煽动 颠覆和分裂的犯罪事实清楚、证据确凿。 黎智英案审理过程中，香港特区高等法院严格遵循法律和司法程序，充分保障控辩双方举证、质证、辩 论的法定权利，判决结果完全取决于事实证据。香港司法机关始终严格恪守司法独立原则，不受任何外 部势力的干涉和影响，以无可辩驳的司法实践彰显了香港法治的严肃性和权威性。案件审理期间，法院 多次确认黎智英在押期间获得妥善的医疗照顾和相应待遇，既坚守法律原则和司法底线，又兼顾人道关 怀，充分体现了香港司法的专业与公正。判决结果一经公布，香港社会各界纷纷拍手称快，痛斥黎智英 罪有应得，这是香港市民的共同心声。法院依法作出判决，让香港市民真切感受到法治的力量、正义的 胜利。 香港是中国的香港，维护国家安全、捍卫香港法治，是香港市民的共同心愿，也是香港特区司法机关的 法定职责。黎智英被依法审判，是法 ...

炒作"健康"救不了反中乱港者，法治正义不容亵渎。香港国安法实施以来，香港社会重回正轨，法治根 基坚如磐石，经济民生持续向好，充分证明维护国家安全是保持香港社会繁荣稳定的根本前提。黎智英 的定罪量刑，不仅是对反中乱港分子的严正警示，更彰显了香港有法必依、违法必究的法治核心价值。 任何试图通过捏造谎言、误导舆论来干涉司法的行为，都是对法治精神的公然蔑视，最终都将在事实与 法律面前彻底破产。香港的法治公义，岂容外部势力与反中乱港分子肆意抹黑？这场"健康闹剧"，注定 以失败收场！ (作者：青平) 香港惩教体系，以制度保障诠释法治人权。香港的惩教体系始终坚守人道主义原则，以制度化、规范化 运作全面保障在囚人士的合法权利。香港惩教署对所有院所实行科学分类管理，配备完备的医疗设施和 专业的24小时医护团队，建立起从预防、诊疗到康复的全链条健康保障机制。所有在囚人士，不论身 份、年龄和国籍，均享有符合营养标准的膳食，可参与文化教育、体育活动和职业技能培训，其通信、 探视等合法权利均依法得到保障。特区政府发言人多次重申，黎智英在囚权利，包括探访、通讯、福 利、宗教服务、户外活动安排等，均依法得到全面保障，其与其他在囚人士的交往 ...

Core Viewpoint - The latest annual business sentiment survey by the American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong indicates strong confidence in the rule of law and a positive outlook for the business environment in Hong Kong over the next few years [1] Group 1: Business Confidence - 94% of member companies express confidence in the rule of law in Hong Kong [1] - 92% of multinational companies have no plans to relocate their headquarters from Hong Kong in the next three years [1] - 73% of member companies provide a positive evaluation of the business environment in Hong Kong for 2025 [1] Group 2: Market Outlook - Looking ahead to 2026, 53% of member companies hold an optimistic or very optimistic view of the market prospects in Hong Kong, indicating a steady improvement in investment willingness [1] - 57% of member companies plan to maintain their investment scale in Hong Kong over the next two years, while 33% intend to increase their investment [1] Group 3: Technology Development - 47% of member companies are optimistic about Hong Kong's future development as a regional data center, a significant increase of 19 percentage points from 28% in 2025 [1] Group 4: Survey Details - The survey was conducted from November 11, 2025, to January 16, 2026, with over 450 member companies receiving questionnaires [1] - More than 40% of the responding companies have a global annual revenue exceeding 1 billion dollars [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing legal proceedings against pro-democracy figure Jimmy Lai under Hong Kong's National Security Law, highlighting the resilience of Hong Kong's legal system against external pressures and interference [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Judicial Independence - The Hong Kong judiciary is described as having a solid foundation, unaffected by external political pressures, as stated by legal professionals [1]. - Chief Justice of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, Zhang Jueneng, criticized foreign politicians for attempting to interfere with judicial independence, labeling such actions as detrimental to justice [1]. - The Secretary for Justice, Paul Lam, dismissed the claims made by external forces as baseless accusations [1]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The core of Hong Kong's rule of law is judicial independence, as emphasized by Gu Minkang, Director of the National Security and Law Education Research Center at the Education University of Hong Kong [1]. - Any actions that challenge legal boundaries or endanger national security will face severe penalties, and attempts to interfere with the judiciary will not succeed [1]. - The court's handling of Jimmy Lai's case was noted to respect his legal rights, allowing him to hire lawyers, present evidence, and plead, thus upholding procedural justice [1]. Group 3: Public Perception and International Response - Legal experts suggest that the judiciary should continue to uphold its traditions and principles, providing clear explanations regarding the specifics of the Lai case to the public and the international community [2]. - Legislative Council member Chan Yong highlighted the courage of Hong Kong judges in the face of external pressures, attributing it to their commitment to legal principles [2]. - Chan emphasized that the integrity of Hong Kong's judicial system withstands scrutiny against defamatory claims regarding its rule of law [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles emphasizes that individuals involved in anti-China activities in Hong Kong, particularly Jimmy Lai, will face justice under the law, highlighting the importance of legal proceedings in maintaining order and justice in Hong Kong [1][2] - The legal process surrounding Jimmy Lai's case included a thorough examination of evidence, with 2,220 pieces of evidence and over 80,000 pages of related documents reviewed during a 156-day public hearing, resulting in a comprehensive 855-page judgment [1] - Lai's actions are characterized as severe crimes, including collusion with foreign forces and inciting hatred against China, with his extreme statements calling for foreign intervention and sanctions against China being particularly condemned [1] Group 2 - The "plea" phase in Hong Kong's criminal procedure allows defendants to present reasons for leniency after conviction, but Lai showed no remorse during this phase, attempting to garner sympathy by highlighting his age and health, despite records indicating his stable health [2] - The article notes that some Western politicians have attempted to intervene in Lai's case, revealing a double standard in their approach to national security issues, which undermines the principles of international law and justice [2] - The expectation for fair punishment of anti-China figures is seen as a collective hope for the future development of Hong Kong, reinforcing the integrity of the legal system [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong judiciary, represented by Chief Justice Andrew Cheung and Secretary for Justice Paul Lam, strongly defends judicial independence against external pressures and sanctions related to national security cases, emphasizing that such actions undermine the rule of law [1][2][4]. Group 1: Judicial Independence - Chief Justice Andrew Cheung equates threats against judges with corruption, stating that both are methods that undermine justice and are unacceptable in a civilized legal society [2]. - Secretary for Justice Paul Lam criticizes the notion that the government always wins national security cases, providing examples of cases where the government lost, thereby reinforcing the independence of the judiciary [6][7]. Group 2: Response to External Criticism - Both Cheung and Lam address the external narrative that questions the integrity of Hong Kong's judicial system, asserting that the judiciary operates based on law and evidence, not political considerations [9]. - Cheung emphasizes the importance of respecting the Basic Law and the decisions of the Court of Final Appeal, countering misinterpretations of Hong Kong's constitutional framework [9]. Group 3: Social Responsibility of the Judiciary - Cheung expresses deep sorrow over the tragic fire incident in Tai Po, highlighting the judiciary's role not only as a legal guardian but also as a source of support for the community during times of crisis [11].