Problematic Artifacts & Provenance - The Manitoba Museum holds nearly 3 million artifacts and specimens, many from First Nations, Inuit, and Matey communities, but some lack documented histories or provenance [6] - A Japanese samurai armor in the museum's collection lacks any documentation as to how it entered the collection, including donor name, craftspeople, cultural significance, or travel history [3][4] - Museums have historically been entangled in exploitation, colonialism, and racism, acting as repositories of conquest and violence, displaying stolen artifacts to uphold certain world views [8][9] Repatriation & Rematriation - Museums have a responsibility to return ceremonial, sacred, and other items to the First Nations, Inuit, and Matey communities from which they originated, globally [12] - Museums must incur the costs of finding descendant communities through donor records, archives, historic maps, and oral histories [13] - Museums should play a role in rematriation, standing beside First Nations, Inuit, and Matey communities as they reclaim their sacred relationships with lands and waters [14] Shared Authority & Collaboration - Museums should share authority with communities, working in partnership to amplify systemically excluded histories through co-creation, co-curation, co-authoring, and co-exhibiting [15] - "Nothing about us without us" should be at the forefront of all museum work, with communities telling their own stories [15] - Museums should collect with consent and work with communities to document their histories, so those histories can become teachers [17] Future of Museums - The transformation of museums is possible, creating spaces rooted in truth, grounded in repair, and welcoming to all [19] - Museums should uphold justice, make space for uncomfortable truths, and honor histories, celebrating indigenous ingenuity and contributions [16] - Visitors are seeking truth, looking for missing stories, and calling on museums to abandon neutrality and be allies in truth, reconciliation, and justice [17][18]

Immigration System Exploitation - Scammers are exploiting a flawed UK immigration system, targeting vulnerable people seeking work in the care sector [1] - Victims are often abandoned by authorities after losing significant sums of money, sometimes selling their houses [1] - The UK government rushed the process of allowing care businesses to recruit staff from overseas, leading to exploitation [1] - People were paying £5,000 to £20,000 to get a certificate of sponsorship (COS) that proved they had a job in the UK, but employers often disappeared [1] - The introduction of the social care visa led to a huge increase in migration and a deeply damaging increase in abuse and exploitation [5] Scam Tactics and Impact - Scammers pressure migrant workers to pay quickly, then delay the process, blaming the home office or others [3] - Victims are losing money and experiencing mental health issues, impacting their sense of self and future [4] - Scams are tearing communities apart, especially when agents are involved [3] - Victims in Zimbabwe cannot report to the police in the UK, leaving them with limited recourse [4] Financial Losses and Recovery Efforts - One woman in South Africa was scammed of £6,500 [1] - One person lost $3,500 US [2] - One victim paid £58,000 [1] - One agent scammed over £50,000 from people [2] - One person owes $5,660 [4] - Mr Brown recovered over £100,000 for victims [4] Government and Law Enforcement Response - The UK government is ending overseas recruitment of care workers and closing the COS route [5] - Action Fraud received more than 300 cases of COS fraud last year, but there have been no convictions [5] - Victims blame the British government for leaving the system open to exploitation and the UK police for failing to help [5]