Legal & Political Analysis - The indictment of Leticia James is viewed by some as potential political retaliation, contrasting with the due process afforded to Donald Trump in James's case against him [2][4][5] - The speed of the grand jury's decision, reaching a verdict on its first day, raises questions about the process [7] - Career prosecutors and even Trump appointees initially did not believe there was sufficient evidence to indict Leticia James, suggesting a departure from standard DOJ practices [2][10] - The appointment of Lindseay Halligan, a US attorney with limited experience, is questioned regarding its legality and potential impact on the validity of prosecutions [14] - Concerns are raised about the weaponization of the Justice Department for political purposes, potentially chilling individuals from standing up to power [13][16] Department of Justice & Rule of Law - The Eastern District of Virginia, traditionally known for its rigorous terrorism and national security prosecutions, risks being tainted by perceived political prosecutions [11][12] - The DOJ's manual advises against bringing cases out of pettiness, political goals, or animosity, emphasizing the need for solid facts and public interest [13] - There are concerns about the potential invocation of the Insurrection Act and the use of the military to assert control, potentially impacting future elections [15] Selective Prosecution & Hypocrisy - Allegations of selective prosecution arise, pointing to instances where Trump's cabinet members faced similar mortgage issues as those James is being accused of [16] - Trump's public statements directing the Attorney General to indict political opponents are seen as evidence of payback and a chilling effect on dissent [17][18]

Okay. How this all came together was a very bumpy bumpy road. Uh it started with Donald Trump basically publicly calling out for Pam Bondi to please bring his perceived enemies to justice. He has described Leticia James, James Comey, Adam Schiff, and a long list beyond that as you know uh as people that are guilty as hell. But what connects all of them is that they either investigated or questioned Donald Trump's governance and and other actions that he took in his first administration and now in the curren ...

Legal Proceedings - Former FBI Director Jim Comey pleaded not guilty to two criminal counts: lying to Congress and obstruction [1] - Comey's trial is scheduled for January 5th, 2026, and is expected to last two to three days [1] - Comey's legal team plans to challenge every aspect of the case, including the appointment of acting US attorney Lindseay Halligan [2] - The legality of Halligan's appointment as acting US attorney is being questioned, potentially impacting the validity of the indictment [3] Allegations of Political Interference - Comey's legal team argues that his prosecution is a case of malicious and selective prosecution by the Trump administration [3] - Public statements by Donald Trump suggest a push to prosecute Jim Comey [4] - Trump fired the prosecutor who refused to bring the case against Comey and suggested Lindseay Halligan as the new US attorney [4] Case Details and Transparency - Comey's attorney reports a lack of details regarding the case, including the identities of "person three" and "person one" mentioned in the indictment [6] - The specifics of counts one and two in the indictment remain unclear to Comey's legal team [6] - Lindseay Halligan is reportedly bringing in assistant US attorneys from other offices to help prosecute the case against Jim Comey [5]

Does the increasing use of the shadow docket follow the rule of law? Our “Checks and Balance” podcast looks at the Supreme Court’s new term https://t.co/FLgYIiqOOa ...

Well, you have been forced to, General Bont. I mean, this is supposed to be a conversation about Oregon. Let's talk about how it is that you ended up here and just how annoyed this judge, a Trump appointee, seems to be about the fact that she needed to rule on this, not once but twice.The judge was annoyed and um AG Rayfield had things in hand with a temporary restraining order secured on Saturday, but uh Trump tried again uh in violation certainly of the spirit of that order by deploying 300 California Nat ...

Political Commentary & Legal Concerns - Allegations of abuse of power exceeding Watergate and J Edgar Hoover eras [1] - Claims of violating the Constitution, separation of powers, and the First Amendment [1] - Calls for a full investigation into those involved, including who knew, ordered, and approved actions [1] - Demand for prosecution of anyone who violated the law [1] Specific Accusations - Accusations of spying on Catholic churches [1] - Accusations of prosecuting pro-lifers [1] - Accusations of deploying the FBI against parents at school board meetings [1] - Accusations of attempting to tap the phones of political enemies [1] Call to Action - Emphasis on restoring the rule of law to save the country [1]

Today is a day when the battle for democracy has perhaps never been clearer. The courts for now still holding up the rule of law and ruling in favor of cities and states opposing Donald Trump's efforts to militarize our cities and to use troops against what Trump describes as quote the enemy within. Today, the state of Illinois is suing the Trump administration to stop the deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago. Trump has ordered 400 troops to be mobilized from Texas and then to be sent to Chicago a ...

James Comey, the former FBI director, indicted last night after a very convoluted process. We'll get into that. Because President Trump had literally admitted that he wanted to call the play and have this person indicted regardless of doubts and evidence problems within his own DOJ.Comey is now speaking out. When this news first broke about this within this hour last night, about 24 hours ago, we had just gotten the indictment, just gotten that news. We now have a statement from James Comey which denies any ...

York. We begin today with the message of defiance from the former director of the FBI whose indictment last night marks a radical turn, a literal hinge point in which our country ceased adhering to one of the central tenants of life in a democracy. So begins an ugly new chapter in which an unpopular ruler purges his own political party of prosecutors until he arrives at the weakest link in the chain. That link willing to do what two Republican prosecutors in good standing with MAGA refused to do over a seri ...

Let's have a trial. Keep the faith. Claire McKascal, as we've been saying all week, whether it's Jimmy Kemmel or whether it's whether it's James Comey now, it seems Donald Trump uh is just insistent on turning his political enemies into martyrs and heroes. And in this case, he has brought a case. He's forced uh his justice department to bring a case. and has laid out all the evidence as to why any judge will likely dismiss it. Yeah, it's certainly some irony here that I believe Donald Trump owes his preside ...