RT s4mmy (@S4mmyEth)This is a thought provoking statement for a Sunday.Centralization risk is the ‘elephant in the room’:i) If ETH’s economic security (staked ETH) is dwarfed by the total value of stables it secured, there’s a theoretical imbalance.But some may initially think that stables are just tokenized RWAs (USD mostly). Controlled centrally by Tether, Circle, etc.So why would someone perform a 51% attack on the network to seize freezable assets?Not the issue here.ii) Is there a business risk for stab ...

The government is embedding data management into the economy and national security. That has implications for China, and holds lessons for democracies https://t.co/6yq6v4jIwc ...

随着数字化的持续深入，市场环境的瞬息万变，目前IT部门在企业中的现状呈现出两极分化的趋势：一方面，数字化转型加速推进，有的企业IT部门的战 略地位得到提升；另一方面，AI和自动化等新技术的广泛应用导致部分企业的IT岗位被裁撤，IT部门甚至面临重组和优化。 正因如此，IT部门在企业中常被视为"配角"，一旦企业陷入困境，其成员往往首当其冲面临裁员。优先减员其部门的原因，可能有以下几点： 首先不得不承认的是裁员IT部门，尤其是外包或初级岗位，能迅速在财务报表上看到成本下降，成本易量化且"见效快"。 其次从业务视角来看，管理层可能存在这样的认知：裁撤IT部门人员对于业务的影响是间接的，削减IT人员不会立即影响销售或者产品开发。 另外对于一些传统的IT部门人员来说，技能落后，手动和本地化程度高，逐渐被新技术、自动化所淘汰。外包也在一定程度上替代部分工作，这助推了裁 撤部分IT人员。 据小编了解到，很多IT同仁面临这样的处境：部门间内卷严重，IT预算大幅缩减，职业前景十分迷茫……所以本文我们来聊一聊IT部门为何看似"配角"， 且易被裁员？ 从企业内部视角来看，IT部门给人的固有印象就是一个"成本中心"，尤其是在与业务部门 ...

The government is embedding data management into the economy and national security. That has implications for China, and holds lessons for democracies https://t.co/MVsngSsJdc ...

Besides celebrating shared bonds, culture and history, the leaders of Britain and France will face the hard grind of, among other things, enhancing Europe’s security—and paying for it https://t.co/PN9T3OgsmZ ...

Microsoft Confirms Windows 11 Update Causes Security Firewall Error https://t.co/MqdpgafuR1 ...

RT s4mmy (@S4mmyEth)This is a thought provoking statement for a Sunday.Centralization risk is the ‘elephant in the room’:i) If ETH’s economic security (staked ETH) is dwarfed by the total value of stables it secured, there’s a theoretical imbalance.But some may initially think that stables are just tokenized RWAs (USD mostly). Controlled centrally by Tether, Circle, etc.So why would someone perform a 51% attack on the network to seize freezable assets?Not the issue here.ii) Is there a business risk for stab ...

RT s4mmy (@S4mmyEth)This is a thought provoking statement for a Sunday.Centralization risk is the ‘elephant in the room’:i) If ETH’s economic security (staked ETH) is dwarfed by the total value of stables it secured, there’s a theoretical imbalance.But some may initially think that stables are just tokenized RWAs (USD mostly). Controlled centrally by Tether, Circle, etc.So why would someone perform a 51% attack on the network to seize freezable assets?Not the issue here.ii) Is there a business risk for stab ...

All right, welcome back to the weekend prime time. Now that Trump's mega bill is now mega law, Democrats are pivoting from fighting the bill's passage to using it against Republicans in the midterms. The bill is wildly unpopular.I probably don't need to tell you that. A Fox News poll found only 38% of registered voters support it while 59% oppose it. DNC Chair Ken Martin tells the AP, quote, "Republicans own this mess and it's an albatross around their necks heading into the midterms, this is the least popu ...

Exclusive: The Trump administration is signaling interest in finding a way to keep the Social Security retirement trust fund solvent https://t.co/E2NfH4zyPw ...