伊朗总统： 伊朗不会制造原子弹，也不会追求拥有核武器及大规模杀伤性武器。 来源：央视新闻客户端 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c n e n e rg y） 责编丨李慧颖 当地时间9月24日，伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬在第80届联合国大会一般性辩论上发言时重申， 伊朗不会制造原子弹，也不会追求拥有核武器及大规模杀伤性武器。 佩泽希齐扬说，伊朗从未追求、也永远不会制造原子弹；伊朗不需要核武器，这是伊朗人 民的信仰和道德底线。他呼吁停止将科学家和专家变为战争目标，呼吁国际社会对核设施 进行透明、公正的监管。 此外，佩泽希齐扬还表态，反对将多边机制工具化。他说，有的安理会成员国滥用自己的 地位行使霸权，破坏"伊核协议"（JCPOA），声称伊朗没有诚意履约，却掩盖了美国单 方面退出该协议的事实。这种双重标准的行径，严重破坏了多边主义的基础和国际法的尊 严。 ...

中新社北京9月24日电 综合消息：伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊当地时间23日晚发表电视讲话称，伊朗不会在 铀浓缩问题上屈服于压力，在当前形势下与美国谈判无益于伊朗国家利益。 哈梅内伊称与美国谈判无益于伊朗国家利益 据伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社消息，哈梅内伊说，美方已经从自己的角度预设了谈判结果，并自行宣布希 望谈判能够导致伊朗停止核活动和铀浓缩活动，"参加这样的谈判是接受对方命令、强加于人的要求和 欺凌的表现"。他表示，与美国谈判"反而可能造成重大、有时是不可挽回的损失"。 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 美国和伊朗自今年4月以来举行五轮由斡旋方阿曼居中传话的间接谈判，双方在铀浓缩等核心议题上分 歧巨大。因以色列突袭伊朗，原定于6月15日举行的第六轮间接谈判取消。为施压伊朗与美国恢复谈 判，英国、法国、德国8月28日通知联合国安理会，以伊朗违反伊核协议为由，启动"快速恢复制裁"机 制。9月19日，安理会未能通过旨在继续解除对伊朗制裁的决议草案。(完) 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：万可义 广告 ...

英法德三国日前强推安理会恢复对伊制裁，伊朗国内各层面陆续作出回应，谴责英法德三国行为并宣布将暂停与国际原子能机构的合作。 0:00 总台记者 李霜溪：近期伊朗局势再次紧张。伊核协议参与方英国、法国、德国8月28日通知联合国安理会，以伊朗违反伊核协议为由，启动"快速恢复制 裁"机制。根据该机制，当天起，如果安理会未能在30天内就继续解除对伊制裁通过决议，安理会过去针对伊朗通过的6项决议将恢复，其中包含制裁措施。 联合国安理会19日就继续解除对伊朗制裁的决议草案举行表决，由于美、英、法等9国投反对票，草案未获通过。接下来，伊朗同英法德三国及相关国家仍 有一周左右时间进行外交磋商，避免对伊制裁恢复。伊朗常驻联合国代表伊拉瓦尼表示，尽管伊朗9月9日与国际原子能机构就恢复在伊朗核查活动的可行模 式达成协议，但美国和欧洲没有遵守。同时他也表示伊朗的"外交之门"仍未关闭。 总台记者 李霜溪：对此伊朗国内各层面陆续作出回应。伊朗外交部19日发表声明，谴责英国、法国、德国当天试图强行推动联合国安理会恢复制裁伊朗的 决议，表示伊朗决心继续推进和平核计划，同时保留"回应的权利"。声明说，英法德此举"非法、不合理且挑衅，严重损害当前 ...

Core Points - The Russian Foreign Ministry's statement emphasizes that the actions of European signatories to the Iran nuclear deal to restore sanctions are provocative and illegal, potentially escalating tensions around the Iran nuclear issue [1][2] - The statement highlights that the UN Security Council's vote on September 19 to continue lifting sanctions against Iran saw Russia, China, Algeria, and Pakistan voting in favor, while the European countries and the US voted against [1] - The Russian Foreign Ministry asserts that the vote does not allow other countries to restore sanctions against Iran, and it condemns the Western countries' disregard for international law [1][2] Summary by Sections - **Russia's Position on Sanctions** The Russian Foreign Ministry criticizes the push by European countries and the US to restore sanctions on Iran, labeling it as a violation of international law and a source of increased tension [1][2] - **UN Security Council Vote** The UN Security Council's recent vote resulted in a failure to pass a resolution to continue lifting sanctions against Iran, with Russia and its allies supporting the resolution while Western nations opposed it [1][2] - **Future Diplomatic Efforts** Russia, alongside China, has proposed a technical extension of the UN Security Council Resolution 2231 to create conditions for negotiations and to address concerns regarding Iran's peaceful use of nuclear energy [2]

Group 1 - The Russian Foreign Ministry condemned the attempts by the UK, France, and Germany to forcefully push for the restoration of sanctions against Iran in the UN Security Council [1] - The Russian side has repeatedly pointed out that the actions of the European countries involved in the Iran nuclear deal are provocative and illegal [1] - These actions will further escalate tensions surrounding Iran's nuclear program [1] Group 2 - The UN Security Council failed to pass a draft resolution to continue lifting sanctions on Iran on the 19th [1]

Group 1 - The UN Security Council failed to pass a resolution to extend the sanctions waiver on Iran, with the proposal not receiving the required nine votes for approval [2] - The resolution was proposed by South Korea, the rotating president of the Security Council in September, and was opposed by the US, UK, and France among others [2] - If the resolution had passed, it would have continued to lift UN sanctions on Iran based on the 2015 nuclear deal and Security Council Resolution 2231 [2] Group 2 - The UK, France, and Germany triggered the "snapback" sanctions mechanism on August 28, citing Iran's "serious non-compliance" with the nuclear deal [2][3] - The "snapback" mechanism allows for the restoration of sanctions if the Security Council does not pass a resolution to continue the sanctions waiver within 30 days [2] - There are concerns regarding the legality of the "snapback" mechanism activation by the UK, France, and Germany, as it bypassed the required "dispute resolution mechanism" [3] Group 3 - Iran has expressed opposition to the activation of the "snapback" mechanism and reached an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency regarding the resumption of verification activities in Iran [3] - Despite the failure to pass the sanctions waiver resolution, negotiations on the issue may continue during the upcoming General Assembly debate [3]

Core Viewpoint - The UN Security Council voted on a proposal to reinstate sanctions against Iran, resulting in 4 votes in favor, 9 against, and 2 abstentions, leading to the restoration of sanctions by the end of the month due to insufficient support for exemption [1] Group 1: Sanctions and Agreements - The sanctions that were previously exempted under the Iran nuclear deal will be reinstated on the 28th of this month [1] - China and Russia voted in favor of continuing the exemption from sanctions [1] - The Iran nuclear deal, established in 2015, involved Iran agreeing to limit its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions [1] Group 2: Political Reactions - Iran criticized the European nations for threatening to reinstate international sanctions, labeling their actions as politically motivated [1] - Iran warned that if diplomatic efforts fail, it would consider all options available [1] Group 3: Historical Context - The nuclear agreement has been in a state of suspension since the U.S. unilaterally withdrew during Trump's presidency, leading Iran to retract some of its commitments a year later [1] - The UK, France, and Germany have proposed to the Security Council that Iran has violated the 2015 agreement by not adhering to its commitments to limit nuclear weapons development [1]

Core Points - The UN Security Council failed to pass a resolution to continue lifting sanctions on Iran, with the proposal not receiving the required nine votes for approval [1] - The resolution was proposed by South Korea, the rotating president of the Security Council for September, and received support from China, Russia, Pakistan, and Algeria, while the US, UK, and France opposed it [1] - If passed, the resolution would have continued to lift sanctions based on the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and relevant Security Council Resolution 2231 [1] - The UK, France, and Germany initiated a "snapback" mechanism on August 28, citing Iran's violations of the nuclear deal, which would restore sanctions if no resolution is passed within 30 days [1] - The legality of the "snapback" mechanism is questioned, as it bypassed the required "dispute resolution mechanism" outlined in the nuclear deal and Resolution 2231 [1] - Iran has expressed opposition to the "snapback" mechanism and reached an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency on September 9 regarding the restoration of verification activities in Iran [1] Diplomatic Developments - Iran, along with the UK, France, Germany, and other relevant countries, has approximately one week to engage in diplomatic discussions to prevent the restoration of sanctions [2]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei stated that Iran will not yield to what it considers "illegal" demands from the West, which aim to strip Iran of its "inalienable" nuclear rights [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Relations - Baghaei accused the three European countries of acting under U.S. directives, which he claims severely undermines the diplomatic process and lacks goodwill [1] - He emphasized that these countries have neither legal authority nor moral legitimacy to restore sanctions against Iran, arguing that such actions violate both the text and spirit of the Iran nuclear agreement and UN Security Council resolutions [1] Group 2: Recent Developments - Over the past three to four months, Iran engaged in diplomatic efforts with the U.S., demonstrating goodwill and adhering to diplomatic commitments [1] - However, just two days before the sixth round of negotiations, Israel launched attacks on Iran, followed by coordinated strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities by the U.S. and Israel, which Baghaei labeled as acts of aggression aimed at sabotaging negotiations [1] Group 3: Sanctions and Responses - On August 28, the foreign ministers of the UK, France, and Germany issued a joint statement regarding the Iran nuclear issue, notifying the UN Security Council of their intention to activate a "rapid re-imposition of sanctions" mechanism [1] - If the Security Council does not pass a resolution to extend the sanctions waiver against Iran within 30 days, the related sanctions will be restored [1] - Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif condemned this move as lacking justification and indicated that Iran would respond appropriately [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the UK, France, and Germany have initiated the "snapback sanctions" mechanism regarding Iran's nuclear issue, warning that if the UN Security Council does not extend the sanctions waiver within 30 days, previous sanctions will be reinstated [1][2] - The three countries have expressed their intention to continue diplomatic engagement with Iran during the 30-day countdown [2][6] - Iran's Foreign Minister has condemned the actions of the UK, France, and Germany as unjustified and illegal, indicating that Iran will respond appropriately [3][7] Group 2 - Since 2019, Iran has failed to comply with the nuclear agreement, prompting the UK, France, and Germany to take this action [2] - The "snapback sanctions" mechanism allows the signatories of the nuclear agreement to respond to Iran's violations, with the mechanism's validity set to expire on October 18 of this year [2] - Iran has gradually ceased compliance with parts of the nuclear agreement since May 2019, but maintains that its actions are reversible [2]