I analyze securities based on value investing, an owner's mindset, and a long-term horizon. I don't write sell articles as those are considered short theses, and I never recommend shorting.Former advisory representative at Fidelity. I do my own investing now and share my research here.Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expres ...

Asia Value & Moat Stocks is a research service for value investors seeking Asia-listed stocks with a huge gap between price and intrinsic value, leaning towards deep value balance sheet bargains (i.e. buying assets at a discount e.g. net cash stocks, net-nets, low P/B stocks, sum-of-the-parts discounts) and wide moat stocks (i.e. buying earnings power at a discount in great companies like "Magic Formula" stocks, high-quality businesses, hidden champions and wide moat compounders). Sign up here to get starte ...

Artificial intelligence (AI) stocks might be the big thing on Wall Street, with rising valuations and trending tickers. But that doesn't mean there aren't good values to be found. While there are some fears that a bubble will form in AI, many of the big tech stocks leading the charge look downright undervalued. In fact, some of them even fall into the classic Warren Buffett model of value investing.Buffett is known for avoiding tech stocks for most of his career, but there are some AI-related tech stocks th ...

We are currently offering a free two-week trial to Distressed Value Investing . Join our community to receive exclusive research about various companies and other opportunities along with full access to my portfolio of historic research that now includes over 1,000 reports on over 100 companies.Aaron Chow, aka Elephant Analytics has 15+ years of analytical experience and is a top rated analyst on TipRanks. Aaron previously co-founded a mobile gaming company (Absolute Games) that was acquired by PENN Enterta ...

Core Insights - The Conservative Income Portfolio aims to target value stocks with high margins of safety while reducing volatility through well-priced options [1][2] - The Enhanced Equity Income Solutions Portfolio is designed to generate yields of 7-9% while minimizing volatility [1] - Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) has been a focus for analysts, indicating potential investment interest [1] Investment Strategies - The Covered Calls Portfolio is structured to provide lower volatility income investing with an emphasis on capital preservation [1] - The fixed income portfolio is focused on acquiring securities that offer high income potential and are significantly undervalued compared to peers [1][2] - Trapping Value, with over 40 years of combined experience, emphasizes options income generation while prioritizing capital preservation [2]

Core Insights - Kingstone Companies (KINS) shares have declined 2.7% year-to-date, underperforming the industry increase of 6.6% and trading at a discount to its 52-week high [1][8] - The company is the 12th largest homeowner insurer in New York with a market share of 2.1% and a market capitalization of $210 million [3] - KINS shares are trading at a premium to the industry with a price-to-book value of 2.45X compared to the industry average of 1.56X [6] Financial Performance - The 2025 EPS outlook is projected between $1.75 and $2.15, reflecting growth driven by rising premiums and strict underwriting [8][10] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2025 earnings is $1.90, indicating a 31% increase on revenues of $214 million, with 2026 earnings expected to be $2.45, a 29% increase on revenues of $238.4 million [10] - Kingstone returned to profitability in 2024 with a projected combined ratio of 81%-85% in 2025, showing significant improvement in net margins [15] Market Position and Strategy - Kingstone is positioned to benefit from favorable industry trends, particularly with the Northeastern U.S. commercial insurance market expected to grow by 12.3% through 2025 [12] - The company is executing a focused growth strategy by concentrating on its core business and divesting from non-core segments [13] - Kingstone has realigned its pricing strategy in response to inflation, projecting a 15% to 25% increase in direct written premiums for its core business in 2025 [14] Efficiency and Returns - The return on equity (ROE) for Kingstone in the trailing 12 months was 31.9%, significantly higher than the industry average of 7.8% [16] - The return on invested capital (ROIC) was 29.4%, also above the industry average of 5.9%, indicating effective utilization of funds [18] Growth Potential - Kingstone's focus on improving pricing, combined ratio, and expanding margins is expected to drive strong earnings growth [19] - The average target price for KINS shares is $19, reflecting a 26.7% upside potential from its last closing price [19]

Core Viewpoint - Investors in the Internet - Software sector may find StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) more attractive than F5 Networks (FFIV) for value investing opportunities [1] Valuation Metrics - StoneCo Ltd. has a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating a more favorable earnings estimate revision trend compared to F5 Networks, which has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3] - STNE's forward P/E ratio is 10.60, significantly lower than FFIV's forward P/E of 19.83, suggesting STNE may be undervalued [5] - The PEG ratio for STNE is 0.40, while FFIV's PEG ratio is 2.88, indicating STNE's expected earnings growth is more favorable relative to its price [5] - STNE has a P/B ratio of 2.19 compared to FFIV's P/B of 5, further supporting STNE's valuation attractiveness [6] Value Grades - STNE has earned a Value grade of B, while FFIV has a Value grade of D, highlighting STNE's superior valuation metrics [6]

Investors with an interest in Building Products - Heavy Construction stocks have likely encountered both Great Lakes Dredge & Dock (GLDD) and Dycom Industries (DY) . But which of these two companies is the best option for those looking for undervalued stocks? Let's take a closer look.The best way to find great value stocks is to pair a strong Zacks Rank with an impressive grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system. The Zacks Rank is a proven strategy that targets companies with positive earnings ...

Core Viewpoint - Grupo Financiero Banorte SAB de CV (GBOOY) is currently viewed as a better value opportunity compared to Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) based on various financial metrics and rankings [1]. Group 1: Company Rankings - GBOOY has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while BAM has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - The Zacks Rank system emphasizes companies with positive estimate revision trends, which supports GBOOY's improving earnings outlook [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - GBOOY has a forward P/E ratio of 8.11, significantly lower than BAM's forward P/E of 32.65, suggesting GBOOY is undervalued [5]. - The PEG ratio for GBOOY is 0.95, while BAM's PEG ratio is 1.96, indicating GBOOY's expected earnings growth is more favorable relative to its price [5]. - GBOOY's P/B ratio is 1.84, compared to BAM's P/B of 9.86, further highlighting GBOOY's superior valuation [6]. Group 3: Value Grades - GBOOY holds a Value grade of A, while BAM has a Value grade of F, indicating a significant difference in perceived value between the two stocks [6]. - The combination of solid earnings outlook and favorable valuation metrics positions GBOOY as the superior value option at this time [6].

Core Insights - The article compares Flex (FLEX) and Garmin (GRMN) to determine which stock is more attractive to value investors [1] Group 1: Zacks Rank and Valuation Metrics - FLEX has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a more favorable earnings estimate revision trend compared to Garmin, which has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3] - Value investors consider various valuation metrics to assess if a company is undervalued, including P/E ratio, P/S ratio, earnings yield, and cash flow per share [4] Group 2: Valuation Comparisons - FLEX has a forward P/E ratio of 15.61, while Garmin's forward P/E is significantly higher at 24.75 [5] - FLEX's PEG ratio is 1.50, indicating a better valuation relative to its expected earnings growth compared to Garmin's PEG ratio of 2.22 [5] - FLEX's P/B ratio stands at 3.47, compared to Garmin's P/B ratio of 4.66, further suggesting FLEX is more attractively valued [6] Group 3: Overall Value Assessment - Based on the discussed metrics, FLEX holds a Value grade of A, while Garmin has a Value grade of C, making FLEX the more appealing option for value investors [6]