Subsidies
Search documents
What a looming shutdown means for #markets #politics #shorts
Bloomberg Television· 2025-09-30 15:21
You said Democrats are really focused on health care, on these Affordable Care Act subsidies. What are they exactly and and who do they affect. So, they affect millions of Americans.Um, and uh and it it would come with a bill of about 350 billion dollars to increase these subsidies for into the new year. Um, that's a pretty hefty price tag, although there are plenty of other things that that cost more than that. So um so it it is something that Democrats say is necessary both you know financially from a you ...
X @Bloomberg
Bloomberg· 2025-09-25 16:40
Ecuador’s past two presidents both tried to slash diesel subsidies, only to be forced into climb-downs. Now Daniel Noboa is trying again, and bond investors are betting he will stay the course. https://t.co/kuYE6n30El ...
X @Bloomberg
Bloomberg· 2025-09-22 01:38
Malaysia will reform subsidies on the country’s most popular fuel by end-September, a move that will see foreigners paying higher pump prices as the government looks to narrow its budget deficit https://t.co/V2ebTWq661 ...
Risks of a Government Shutdown Are Rising
Bloomberg Television· 2025-09-18 20:06
Are you preparing for a government shutdown. Should our audience be doing the same. Well, we don't know.The vote has been rescheduled several times now. It looks like it's going to come tomorrow. The Democrats are voting no because there's no consideration of health care and putting back some of the the cuts that have been made to Medicaid or extending the subsidies for Obamacare.And it would be an easy fix if you can't help people who need health care. What's the point. Any leave the government open.They j ...
X @The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal· 2025-09-13 13:09
Democrats want expanded Obamacare subsidies restored in any deal to keep the federal government funded past Sept. 30 https://t.co/n33aZArAnJ ...
X @Bloomberg
Bloomberg· 2025-09-12 08:22
Government Initiatives - Spain is offering subsidies to combat rural depopulation [1] - Spain is selling entire villages to attract people back to sparsely populated regions [1] Regional Development - The government is getting creative to lure people back to sparsely populated regions [1]
X @Bloomberg
Bloomberg· 2025-09-12 04:02
Rural Revitalization Initiatives - Spain is selling villages to attract wealthy individuals back to rural areas [1] - Subsidies are being offered to encourage people to live in sparsely-populated towns [1]
X @Bloomberg
Bloomberg· 2025-08-27 11:15
Market Trends - EU is facing challenges in attracting participants for green hydrogen subsidies due to potential recipients dropping out [1] Industry Challenges - The green hydrogen market is struggling to gain momentum despite the availability of subsidies [1]
When Washington Buys Intel, It Owns You Too
Forbes· 2025-08-25 13:25
Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration's acquisition of an 8.9% equity stake in Intel highlights the problematic trend of government involvement in business, which often leads to inefficiencies and market distortions rather than progress or innovation [1][7][15]. Government Involvement in Intel - Intel has been a beneficiary of government subsidies since the America COMPETES Act was signed in 2007, with continued support through various administrations, culminating in the recent equity stake by the Trump administration [4][5]. - The rationale for converting $5.7 billion in unpaid CHIPS Act grants into equity includes stabilizing the semiconductor supply chain and reducing reliance on foreign foundries [5][6]. Implications of Government Equity Stake - The government's equity stake in Intel represents a shift towards public-private partnerships, raising concerns about the impact on competition and innovation within the semiconductor industry [6][7]. - The involvement of the federal government in Intel's operations could lead to conflicts of interest, particularly in regulatory decisions affecting competitors and new entrants in the market [7][12]. Historical Context of Government Nationalization - The current situation is compared to historical instances of government nationalization during crises, but the Intel stake occurs in a non-crisis context, raising questions about the appropriateness of such actions [10][11]. - Previous nationalizations, such as those during World War I and the 2008 financial crisis, were justified by immediate needs, unlike the current Intel situation [10][11]. Concerns Over Market Distortion - The infusion of government capital into Intel may undermine the principles of free market competition, leading to a misallocation of resources and talent [7][13][14]. - Critics argue that government involvement distorts market dynamics, blurs ownership rights, and politicizes scientific advancements [7][13]. Call for Separation of Economy and State - There is a strong argument for reinforcing the separation between government and business to prevent further entanglement and ensure that companies operate based on merit rather than government favoritism [14][15][16]. - Ending direct subsidies and public-private partnerships is seen as essential to restoring competitive enterprise and protecting the integrity of the market [15][16].
Should The U.S. Centralize Power To Compete Globally? - Ben Shapiro
All-In Podcast· 2025-08-13 16:00
question for you. We've seen a centralization of authority in the federal government and we're sitting here talking about, hey, central government plus capitalism doesn't work as well as rule of law. Do you worry sometimes, hey, Biden wanted to use executive orders to do the student loan thing and you know, Trump obviously has taken tariffs and there's a big question, maybe the tariffs are, my understanding is they're supposed to reside with Congress and there's a lawsuit about that.Maybe that goes back to ...