New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - December 18, 2025) - Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Stride, Inc. (NYSE: LRN) and certain of the Company's senior executives for securities fraud after significant stock drops resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Stride, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/stride-inc-class-act ...

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - December 18, 2025) - Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against CarMax, Inc. (NYSE: KMX) and certain of the Company's senior executives for securities fraud after a significant stock drop resulting from the potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in CarMax, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/carmax-inc-class-ac ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Synopsys, Inc. and certain senior executives for securities fraud following a significant stock drop due to potential violations of federal securities laws [1][3]. Company Overview - Synopsys, Inc. provides design automation software products used for designing and testing integrated circuits. Its Design IP segment, which supplies pre-designed silicon components to semiconductor companies, has been the fastest-growing segment, increasing from 25% of revenue in 2022 to 31% in 2024 [4]. Allegations and Financial Performance - The lawsuit claims that Synopsys misled investors by stating that customers relied on its IP to minimize integration risk and that the company was experiencing strength in Europe and South Korea. However, it is alleged that customers required more customization for IP components, negatively impacting the economics of the Design IP business [5]. - In Q3 2025, Synopsys reported a revenue of $425.9 million for its Design IP segment, reflecting a 7.7% year-over-year decline, and a net income of $242.5 million, a 43% year-over-year decline. The company indicated that increased customization demands were leading to longer project timelines and resource requirements [6]. Stock Market Reaction - Following the release of disappointing Q3 2025 results, Synopsys' stock price fell from $604.37 per share to $387.78 per share, a decline of nearly 36% in one day [6].

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania--(Newsfile Corp. - December 18, 2025) - National plaintiffs' law firm Berger Montague PC announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Stride, Inc. (NYSE: LRN) ("Stride" or the "Company") on behalf of investors who purchased Stride securities during the period of October 22, 2024 through October 28, 2025 (the "Class Period").Investor Deadline: Investors who purchased Stride securities during the Class Period may, no later than January 12, 2026, seek to be appointed ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against StubHub Holdings, Inc. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws related to its September 17, 2025 IPO [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for investors who purchased StubHub securities under the registration statement and prospectus from the IPO [2]. - The Complaint alleges that the Registration Statement was materially false and misleading, omitting critical information about changes in vendor payment timing and its adverse impact on free cash flow [3]. - It is claimed that these omissions led to materially misleading reports on the Company's free cash flow and that positive statements made by Defendants regarding the Company's business lacked a reasonable basis [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors wishing to join the class action have until January 23, 2026, to request appointment as lead plaintiff, although participation in any recovery does not require this role [4]. - A copy of the Complaint can be reviewed on the law firm's website [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only seek reimbursement for expenses and fees if successful in the lawsuit [5]. - The firm has a strong track record, having recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors in similar cases [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, alleging that the company's registration statement and prospectus related to its merger with Cedar Fair contained misleading information and failed to disclose critical financial issues [1][2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks damages for alleged violations of federal securities laws on behalf of all individuals and entities that held shares of Six Flags common stock related to the merger [2]. - The complaint claims that the registration statement was negligently prepared, containing untrue statements and omitting necessary facts, which misled investors [3]. - Specific allegations include chronic underinvestment in Legacy Six Flags, aggressive cost-cutting measures that degraded operational competence, and undisclosed capital needs that undermined the merger rationale [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who purchased Six Flags shares have until January 5, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the class action [4]. - The law firm representing the investors operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only recover costs if successful [5]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized law firm specializing in securities fraud class actions and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [6]. - The firm emphasizes its commitment to restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability [7].

NEW YORK, Dec. 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE: ARE) and certain of its officers. This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Alexandria securities between January 27, 2025 and Octob ...

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation on behalf of investors who purchased its common stock during the specified class period from July 25, 2024, to October 22, 2025 [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit is initiated by Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, a prominent national shareholder rights law firm [1] - Investors have until February 9, 2026, to file a lead plaintiff motion [1]

Core Points - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Six Flags Entertainment Corp. on behalf of investors who acquired shares between July 1, 2024, and November 5, 2025, particularly related to the merger with Cedar Fair L.P. [1][3] - The lawsuit claims that the merger registration statement and prospectus did not accurately reflect Six Flags' financial and operational status, highlighting years of underinvestment that left the parks needing significant capital to stay competitive [3] - Following the merger closing on July 1, 2024, Six Flags' stock price dropped from over $55 per share to as low as $20, representing a 64% loss in value [4] Company Overview - Six Flags, headquartered in Arlington, Texas, is a prominent owner and operator of theme and water parks [2] - The law firm Berger Montague PC, which is leading the class action, specializes in complex civil litigation and has a strong track record in recovering significant amounts for clients [5]

Core Viewpoint - The James Hardie Industries plc is facing a class action lawsuit alleging securities fraud due to misleading statements about its North America Fiber Cement segment's performance during a period of inventory destocking [1][4][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled "Laborers' District Council and Contractors' Pension Fund of Ohio v. James Hardie Industries plc" and was filed in the Northern District of Illinois [1]. - The lawsuit claims that James Hardie and certain executives violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by providing false assurances about the strength of their business segment despite evidence of inventory destocking [4]. - Investors are encouraged to seek appointment as lead plaintiff by December 23, 2025, if they purchased James Hardie common stock between May 20, 2025, and August 18, 2025 [1][6]. Group 2: Financial Impact - On August 19, 2025, James Hardie reported a 12% decline in sales for its North America Fiber Cement segment, attributed to customer destocking, which was first identified in April and May 2025 [5]. - Following this disclosure, the stock price of James Hardie dropped by over 34%, indicating a significant market reaction to the news [5]. Group 3: Company Background - James Hardie Industries designs and manufactures a variety of fiber cement building products, with manufacturing facilities located in both the United States and Australia [3]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, the law firm representing the plaintiffs, is recognized as a leading firm in securities fraud litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7].