Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a class action lawsuit against monday.com Ltd. alleging that the company and its executives made misleading statements regarding its financial outlook and growth projections, leading to substantial losses for investors [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit, titled Potter v. monday.com Ltd., accuses the company of violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [1]. - The lawsuit claims that monday.com misrepresented its revenue outlook and growth potential, particularly regarding its $1.8 billion target for 2027, which is now deemed increasingly unlikely to be met [1]. - On February 9, 2026, monday.com announced it would no longer discuss its 2027 targets, which resulted in a nearly 21% drop in its stock price [1]. Group 2: Allegations Against Defendants - The lawsuit alleges that the defendants created a false impression of reliable information about monday.com's projected revenue and growth due to factors like decelerating new customer growth and longer sales cycles [1]. - It is claimed that the defendants provided materially flawed statements of confidence and growth projections that did not account for the actual business conditions [1]. Group 3: Lead Plaintiff Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased monday.com common stock during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff [1]. - The lead plaintiff is expected to have the greatest financial interest in the case and will represent the interests of all class members [1]. Group 4: About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a prominent law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [1]. - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, making it one of the largest plaintiffs' firms globally [1].

Core Viewpoint - The law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP has announced a class action lawsuit against Camping World Holdings, Inc. for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with investors who suffered substantial losses during the class period from April 29, 2025, to February 24, 2026, having the opportunity to lead the lawsuit [1]. Summary by Relevant Sections Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit, titled Siverd v. Camping World Holdings, Inc., alleges that Camping World and certain executives made false or misleading statements regarding the company's inventory management and retail demand [1]. - Investors have until May 11, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [1]. Allegations Against Camping World - The lawsuit claims that Camping World overstated its ability to manage inventory using data analytics and misrepresented retail demand, which led to the need for strict inventory management objectives that negatively impacted gross profit and margins [1]. - Specific financial results reported include a 7.0% decrease in new vehicle revenue to $766.8 million for Q3 2025 and an 8.6% decrease in the average selling price of new vehicles sold [1]. - Following the release of Q3 results, Camping World shares fell nearly 25% [1]. - In Q4 2025, the company announced a pause on its quarterly cash dividend and reported that it would implement strict inventory management objectives, leading to a further share price decline of over 16% [1]. Lead Plaintiff Process - The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 allows any investor who purchased Camping World securities during the class period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff, representing the interests of all class members [1]. - The lead plaintiff can choose a law firm to litigate the case, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect an investor's ability to share in any potential recovery [1]. About Robbins Geller - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [1]. - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, making it one of the largest plaintiffs' firms globally [1].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of investors who purchased securities of Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. during the specified Class Period, highlighting potential securities fraud related to the company's New Drug Application for Anaphylm [1]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit pertains to securities purchased between June 16, 2025, and January 8, 2026, and claims that the defendants made false or misleading statements regarding the company's NDA for Anaphylm [1]. - The lawsuit alleges that Aquestive concealed significant human factors related to the use and deployment of its sublingual film, impacting investor decisions [1]. - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [1]. - The firm has a history of achieving significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [1]. - Investors interested in joining the class action can find more information through the provided contact details [1].

Core Viewpoint - Halper Sadeh LLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by certain officers and directors of Semtech Corporation, urging shareholders to take action promptly due to possible time limitations on enforcing their rights [2]. Group 1: Shareholder Rights and Options - Shareholders of Semtech Corporation may seek corporate governance reforms, financial incentives, or other benefits if they are long-term investors [3]. - The firm emphasizes that shareholder involvement is crucial for improving company policies and enhancing shareholder value through better management and accountability [4]. Group 2: Legal Representation and Support - Halper Sadeh LLC represents global investors affected by securities fraud and corporate misconduct, having successfully recovered millions for defrauded investors [5]. - The firm operates on a contingent fee basis, meaning shareholders will not incur out-of-pocket legal fees [1].

Core Viewpoint - A securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. on behalf of investors who acquired its common stock during the specified class period, alleging misleading statements and failure to disclose material adverse facts about the company's drug DCCR [1][6]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Soleno made materially false and misleading statements regarding the safety and efficacy of its drug DCCR, particularly concerning significant safety concerns that were downplayed or concealed during clinical trials [6]. - Investors have until May 5, 2026, to file a lead plaintiff motion in this class action lawsuit [1][7]. Group 2: Stock Price Impact - Following the release of a critical report by Scorpion Capital on August 15, 2025, Soleno's stock price fell by $9.27 per share, or 11.98%, closing at $68.09 on August 18, 2025 [2][3]. - After a patient death linked to DCCR was disclosed on September 10, 2025, the stock price dropped by $13.49 per share, or 19.21%, closing at $56.72 on September 11, 2025 [3]. - On November 4, 2025, after reporting third-quarter results that indicated disruption in DCCR's launch trajectory, the stock price fell by $16.98 per share, or 26.59%, closing at $46.87 on November 5, 2025 [4][5]. Group 3: Allegations Against the Company - The complaint alleges that Soleno failed to disclose that the Phase 3 clinical trial for DCCR had significant safety risks, including issues related to excess fluid retention, which posed greater risks than communicated [6]. - The lawsuit also claims that the commercial viability of DCCR was materially lower than represented, with undisclosed risks related to patient adoption, prescriber reluctance, and potential regulatory actions [6].

Core Viewpoint - Kaskela Law LLC is investigating Reservoir Media, Inc. to determine if there have been violations of securities laws or breaches of fiduciary duties related to recent corporate actions [1][2]. Group 1 - The investigation is on behalf of long-term shareholders of Reservoir Media [1]. - Shareholders are encouraged to contact lead investigative attorney Adrienne Bell for more information [3]. - Kaskela Law LLC specializes in representing investors in securities fraud and corporate governance litigation [3].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Trip.com Group Limited for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the specified class period from April 30, 2024, to January 13, 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for investors who purchased Trip.com securities during the class period [2]. - The Complaint alleges that the Defendants made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose significant regulatory risks associated with Trip.com's monopolistic business activities [3]. - It is claimed that the Defendants' statements regarding Trip.com's business operations and prospects were materially false and lacked a reasonable basis throughout the class period [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses in Trip.com have until May 11, 2026, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the case [4]. - Participation in any recovery does not require serving as lead plaintiff [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC operates on a contingency fee basis, meaning they will only seek reimbursement for expenses and fees if successful [5]. - The firm has a strong track record, having recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors in securities fraud class actions [6].

NEW YORK, March 12, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Camping World Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CWH) and certain of its officers. This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Camping World securities between April 29, 2025 and February 24, ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Richtech Robotics Inc. for allegedly misleading investors about its business relationship with Microsoft, leading to a significant drop in stock price [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased Richtech securities from January 27, 2026, to January 29, 2026 [1][2]. - Investors have until April 3, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representative of the class [2]. - The complaint alleges that the true nature of Richtech's relationship with Microsoft was revealed on January 29, 2026, when an article stated that Microsoft characterized the engagement as a "standard" customer program with "no commercial element" [3]. Group 2: Stock Price Impact - Following the news about the relationship with Microsoft, Richtech's stock price fell from $5.08 per share on January 28 to $4.02 per share on January 29, and further down to $3.58 per share on January 30, marking a total decline of nearly 30% [3]. Group 3: Company Overview - Richtech Robotics Inc. is based in Las Vegas, Nevada, and specializes in designing and manufacturing AI-enabled service robots for the restaurant and hospitality industries [2].

Core Viewpoint - Driven Brands Holdings Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading financial statements and internal control failures, which resulted in significant investor losses [1] Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Clark v. Driven Brands Holdings Inc. and allows investors who purchased shares between May 9, 2023, and February 24, 2026, to seek lead plaintiff status by May 8, 2026 [1] - Allegations include errors in lease recording, cash balance reporting, and misclassification of expenses, which led to overstatements of cash and revenue for fiscal years 2023 and 2024 [1] - On February 25, 2026, Driven Brands disclosed material errors in its financial statements for fiscal years 2023 and 2024, leading to a nearly 40% drop in stock price [1] Group 2: Financial Misstatements - Specific allegations include errors in right of use assets and liabilities, cash flow reporting, and misclassification of expenses related to company-operated stores [1] - The lawsuit claims that these misstatements affected the consolidated balance sheet and income statement, necessitating a restatement of financial results [1] Group 3: Legal Firm Background - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation, having recovered over $916 million for investors in 2025 alone [1] - The firm has a strong track record, recovering $8.4 billion for investors over the past five years, including the largest securities class action recovery in history [1]