NEW YORK, Feb. 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. (“Endeavor” or the “Company”) (NYSE: EDR).   Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at newaction@pomlaw.com or 646-581-9980, (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 7980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and the number of shares purchased.  The class action concerns whether Endeavor and cer ...

NEW YORK, Feb. 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against BellRing Brands, Inc. (“BellRing” or the “Company”) (NYSE: BRBR).   Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at newaction@pomlaw.com or 646-581-9980, (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 7980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and the number of shares purchased.  The class action concerns whether BellRing and certain of ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Beyond Meat, Inc. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from February 27, 2025, to November 11, 2025, seeking damages for misleading statements regarding the company's financial health and operations [1]. Company Overview - Beyond Meat operates in the food industry, focusing on the development, manufacturing, marketing, and sale of plant-based meat products under the "Beyond" brand in the U.S. and internationally [4]. Financial Challenges - Since early 2025, Beyond Meat has faced shrinking demand, increasing debt, and losses, with a primary goal of achieving positive EBITDA by the end of 2026 [5]. - The company has emphasized operational efficiency and cost reduction over revenue growth, which has been deemphasized as a business concern [6]. Allegations of Misleading Statements - The complaint alleges that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements about the company's business and operations, failing to disclose the likelihood of significant asset impairment charges [8]. - It is claimed that the book value of certain long-lived assets exceeded their fair value, which would necessitate a material, non-cash impairment charge [8]. Stock Price Impact - The truth about the company's financial situation began to emerge on October 24, 2025, when Beyond Meat reported expectations of a non-cash impairment charge, leading to a 23.06% drop in stock price [9]. - Subsequent announcements regarding delays in financial reporting and actual impairment charges resulted in further declines in stock price, with a notable loss of $112.3 million reported for Q3 2025, including $77.4 million in non-cash impairment charges [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - Robbins LLP has announced a class action lawsuit against Picard Medical, Inc. for alleged fraudulent stock promotion activities that misled investors [1] Group 1: Allegations Against Picard Medical, Inc. - The lawsuit claims that Picard Medical was involved in a fraudulent stock promotion scheme that utilized social media misinformation and impersonated financial professionals [1] - It is alleged that insiders and/or affiliates used offshore or nominee accounts to facilitate the coordinated dumping of shares during a price inflation campaign [1] - The company's public statements and risk disclosures reportedly omitted any mention of false rumors and artificial trading activity that influenced the stock price [1] Group 2: Stock Price Impact - On October 24, 2025, Picard Medical's stock price fell sharply by 70%, dropping to $3.99 per share [1] - Following the initial crash, the stock price has continued to decline, reaching approximately $2.00 per share [1] Group 3: Class Action Participation - Investors who purchased Picard Medical securities between September 2, 2025, and October 31, 2025, may be eligible to participate in the class action [1] - Shareholders wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must file their papers with the court by April 3, 2026 [1] - Participation in the case is not required to be eligible for recovery, allowing investors to remain absent class members if they choose [1]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Plug Power Inc. and certain officers for alleged violations of federal securities laws during the Class Period from January 17, 2025, to November 13, 2025, seeking damages for misleading statements regarding the company's business and operations [1][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, seeking to recover damages for all persons and entities that purchased Plug Power securities during the specified Class Period [1]. - Investors have until April 3, 2026, to request appointment as Lead Plaintiff for the class [2]. Group 2: Company Operations - Plug Power provides hydrogen fuel cell turnkey solutions for electric mobility and stationary power markets in North America and Europe, including hydrogen storage and production equipment [4]. - The company has been committed to building a network of hydrogen production plants across the United States [4]. Group 3: Financial Developments - In January 2025, Plug Power announced a $1.66 billion loan guarantee from the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan Program to finance the construction of up to six projects for producing and liquefying zero- or low-carbon hydrogen [5]. - Approval and funding of the DOE Loan were contingent on meeting specific conditions, including technical and performance-related requirements [6]. Group 4: Allegations of Misleading Statements - The Complaint alleges that Plug Power's executives made materially false and misleading statements about the availability of funds from the DOE Loan and the company's ability to construct necessary hydrogen production facilities [7]. - The lawsuit claims that the company was likely to pivot towards less ambitious projects, contradicting earlier public statements [7]. Group 5: Executive Changes and Market Reaction - On October 7, 2025, Plug Power announced the resignation of CEO Andrew Marsh and President Sanjay Shrestha, with Jose Luis Crespo appointed to both roles, which raised concerns about the company's stability [8]. - Following the announcement of executive changes, Plug Power's stock price fell by 6.29% to close at $3.87 per share [9]. - On November 10, 2025, the company reported financial results and announced a suspension of activities under the DOE loan program, leading to a further decline in stock price [10]. - The stock price dropped by 17.58% over two trading sessions after news of the suspension of plans to construct hydrogen facilities [12].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Ramaco Resources, Inc. for allegedly misleading investors regarding the development progress of its projects, particularly the Brook Mine in Wyoming [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased Ramaco securities between July 31, 2025, and October 23, 2025 [1][2]. - Investors have until March 31, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representative of the class [2]. Group 2: Allegations - The complaint alleges that Ramaco overstated development progress at the Brook Mine, which was described as a "hoax" and a "Potemkin Mine" by Wolfpack Research [3]. - The report indicated that no significant mining activity had occurred since the groundbreaking, supported by drone footage and site visits [3]. Group 3: Market Reaction - Following the news of the lawsuit, Ramaco's stock price dropped by $3.81, nearly 10%, closing at $36.01 per share with unusually high trading volume [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation for allegedly making misleading statements and failing to disclose material adverse facts regarding its business performance during the specified Class Period [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who acquired Integer securities from July 25, 2024, to October 22, 2025 [1][2]. - Investors have until February 9, 2026, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff representatives [2]. Group 2: Allegations Against the Company - The complaint alleges that Integer overstated its competitive position and did not adequately disclose a deterioration in sales of its electrophysiology devices [3]. - The lawsuit claims that the company mischaracterized its growth drivers [3]. Group 3: Impact of Disclosures - The truth about the company's performance began to emerge on October 23, 2025, when Integer reduced its sales guidance and disclosed an expected sales decline [3]. - Following these disclosures, Integer's stock price fell by $35.22 per share, a decline of over 32% in one trading day [3].

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Varonis Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRNS) common stock between February 4, 2025 and October 28, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), have until Monday, March 9, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Varonis class action lawsuit. Captioned Molchanov v. Varonis Systems, Inc., No. 26-cv-00117 (S.D.N.Y.), the Varonis class action lawsuit charges Varonis as well as certain of ...

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- National shareholder rights law firm Hagens Berman is issuing an updated notice to investors in BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR) regarding the March 23, 2026, lead plaintiff deadline accusing BellRing and certain of BellRing’s top executives of securities fraud. CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR BRBR LOSSES NOW The suit alleges Defendants misled investors about the true drivers of BellRing’s 2025 sales growth. The truth emerged over a series of disclosures revealin ...

Core Viewpoint - Fermi Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements and failures to disclose critical information during its IPO and subsequent trading period, leading to significant stock price declines [1][3][4]. Group 1: Class Action Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is titled Lupia v. Fermi Inc. and was filed in the Southern District of New York, charging Fermi and its executives with violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [1][3]. - Investors who purchased Fermi common stock during the IPO or between October 1, 2025, and December 11, 2025, can seek appointment as lead plaintiff by March 6, 2026 [1][6]. - The lawsuit alleges that Fermi overstated tenant demand for its Project Matador campus and failed to disclose reliance on a single tenant's funding commitment, which posed a significant risk [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Following the announcement that the first tenant for Project Matador terminated a $150 million funding agreement, Fermi's stock price dropped nearly 34% [4]. - The stock price has since fallen to as low as $8.59 per share, representing a 59% decline from the IPO price of $21.00 per share [5]. Group 3: Company Background - Fermi Inc. is described as an energy and AI infrastructure company, having sold 37,375,000 shares at $21.00 each during its October 2025 IPO [2][3]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, the law firm representing the investors, is noted for its significant recoveries in securities-related class action cases, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [7].