Exclusive: Amazon plans to extend new employment offers to Whole Foods’ U.S. corporate employees https://t.co/cvBwrXkmXA ...

Monetary Policy & Inflation - The market has priced in an 85% chance of a September rate cut, with the remaining 15% split between no cut and a 50 basis points cut [3] - The speaker suggests the Fed is de facto running an inflation target around 2.5% to 3% due to structural changes and employment considerations [8][9] - The long end of the curve's muted reaction suggests recognition of fiscal dominance, with high deficits and debt impacting monetary policy [11][12] Fed's Actions & Communications - The speaker acknowledges the Fed's recognition of higher employment risks but criticizes the lack of clarity on post-September policy and structural changes' implications [3][4] - The speaker expresses disappointment that Jackson Hole address didn't cover long-term strategy issues and lessons learned [5][7] - The speaker points out the Fed's tendency to be data-dependent rather than strategic [8] Sovereign Wealth Fund & Government Intervention - The speaker expresses concern about the government taking stakes in businesses beyond Intel, worrying about the blurring of ownership and control [16] - The speaker warns against government influence on business decisions, emphasizing the importance of a dynamic, entrepreneurial private sector [17][19] Global Economic Interdependence - US long-end rates are more influential globally than other countries' rates are on the US, with a beta near one for the US impacting the rest of the world [13]

Job Market Challenges - Anthropology, physics, computer engineering, commercial art and graphic design, or fine arts majors may face difficulties in finding employment [1] Career Guidance - The report provides tips for graduates to secure employment [1]

Inflation & Employment Risks - Inflation risks are tilted to the upside, while employment risks lean towards the downside [1] - The framework necessitates balancing both sides of the dual mandate [1] Monetary Policy Stance - The policy rate is 100 basis points closer to neutral than a year ago [2] - The stability of the unemployment rate allows for careful consideration of policy changes [2] - With policy in restrictive territory, adjustments to the policy stance may be warranted [2] - Monetary policy is not on a preset course [3] - Decisions will be based solely on data assessment and its implications for the economic outlook and balance of risks [3]

Monetary Policy Framework - The policy decisions are guided by principles that consider deviations from goals and varying time horizons for achieving the dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability [1] - Monetary policy is forward-looking, considering the time lags in its effects on the economy, thus policy actions depend on the economic outlook and balance of risks [2] - Setting a numerical goal for employment is considered unwise because the maximum level of employment is not directly measurable and changes over time for reasons unrelated to monetary policy [3] - A longer-run inflation rate of 2% is viewed as most consistent with the dual mandate goals, and commitment to this target helps keep longer-term inflation expectations well anchored [3] Inflation Target - Experience has shown that 2% inflation is low enough to ensure that inflation is not a concern in household and business decision-making while also providing a central bank with some policy flexibility to provide accommodation during economic downturns [4] Review Cycle - The consensus statement retained a commitment to conduct a public review roughly every 5 years to reassess structural features of the economy and engage with the public, practitioners, and academics on the performance of the framework [4][5]

Monetary Policy Stance - The policy rate is 100 basis points closer to neutral than a year ago [2] - Policy is not on a preset course and may warrant adjusting [2] - Decisions are based solely on data assessment and its implications for the economic outlook and balance of risks [3] Economic Outlook & Risk Assessment - Near-term inflation risks are tilted to the upside, and employment risks to the downside [1] - The framework calls for balancing both sides of the dual mandate (inflation and employment) [1] - The stability of the unemployment rate allows for careful consideration of policy changes [2]

Economic Outlook - Downside risks to employment are rising [1] - Tariff effects on consumer prices are clearly visible [1] - Tariff impact on inflation is expected to be short lived [1] Monetary Policy - A rate cut is anticipated next month [1]

Monetary Policy - The Fed is abandoning its 2020 flexible average inflation targeting framework [1] - Stable inflation expectations cannot be taken for granted [1] - Uncertain estimates that employment may exceed its maximum sustainable level do not necessarily warrant policy tightening [1] - Preemptive action may be needed if a tight labor market risks price stability [1] Inflation & Tariffs - The impact of tariffs on consumer prices is now clearly evident [1]

Monetary Policy Outlook - Powell indicates potential rate cuts due to rising employment risks [1] - The industry anticipates a possible policy adjustment based on the balance of risks [1] Economic Assessment - Risks to employment are increasing [1] - The industry's base case is that tariff impact on inflation will be short-lived [1]

One in five U.S. employers surveyed by the Conference Board plans to slow hiring in the second half of 2025 https://t.co/2puKpcwXtH ...