Political Violence & Free Speech - The report condemns political violence as an attack on free speech and American democracy [1] - The report highlights multiple instances of political violence against individuals from both sides of the political spectrum [1] - The report criticizes those who condone or downplay political violence depending on the victim's political affiliation [2] Hypocrisy & Double Standards - The report accuses some individuals of hypocrisy for selectively condemning political violence [1][2] - The report points out the selective outrage regarding political violence, depending on the victim's political affiliation [1] Call for Consistency - The report calls for a consistent condemnation of political violence, regardless of the victim's or perpetrator's political affiliation [2] - The report emphasizes that celebrating political violence is unacceptable [2]

Joining us now, New York Times White House correspondent Tyler Pager, Slate senior editor and host of the Amicus podcast, Dalia Lithwick. She's also an MSNBC law and politics analyst. And MSNBC political analyst and former press secretary to former House Speakers John Boehner and Paul Ryan, Brendan Buck.All right, Dalia. Hate speech. Has it been tested by the Supreme Court before.You know who else says there's no such thing as hate speech. Katie was um Charlie Kirk who said it does not exist in America. The ...

You mentioned the question of free speech. >> The attorney general of the United States, Pam Bondi, said yesterday, "The government will crack down now on comments it considers to be hate speech. " This is what she said on a podcast hosted by Katie Miller, who was married to Trump's top deputy, Steven Miller. >> There's free speech and then there's hate speech. And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society. Do you see more law enforcement going after these ...

From @WSJopinion: While reasonable minds can differ on the best way to conduct elections, there’s no doubt that refusing to hire workers for expressing disfavored views is unconstitutional—a textbook First Amendment violation, writes @VivekGRamaswamy https://t.co/3vbeAxX5nE ...

This morning, I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting. It is a high-powered bolt-action rifle. That rifle was was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled.So, the FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon. Investigators have also collected footwear impression, a palm print, and forearm imprints for analysis. Now, I understand there are a lot of questions about motive.I assure you that all leads, tips, and tips are being ...

the political world processing we're on processing the assassination of 31-year-old conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Joining us now CNBC contributor Heidi Heidam. She's a former uh US senator and former speaker of the house uh Kevin McCarthy. Uh he is chairman of the uh the Alpha Institute. We you know we cover everything obviously. Um hasn't been 24 hours. I don't even know what uh we try to determine or discern about what happened yesterday. Ivy, you know, I look at it and this is what I do for a livin ...

Group 1 - Coventry First LLC has filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit from Abacus Global Management, arguing that the lawsuit aims to suppress constitutionally protected free speech regarding critical issues in the life settlement industry [1][2] - The motion highlights that Abacus's key life expectancy forecasting supplier, Lapetus Solutions, Inc., has ceased operations as of August 31, 2025, raising concerns about Abacus's business model [1] - Coventry emphasizes the importance of transparent disclosures for investors and regulators, asserting that the First Amendment protects the right to express concerns on significant public issues [2] Group 2 - Coventry is a leader and pioneer in the secondary market for life insurance, having paid over $6 billion to policyholders who no longer need their policies [2]

RT Joseph D. McBride, Esq. (@McBrideLawNYC)America vs. Britain: One Nation Speaks, One Nation is SilentAMERICA: Free speech lives. The First Amendment still shields the man who speaks truth, no matter how offensive. That shield is why our democracy survives. Men bled and died to secure it.UNITED KINGDOM: Free speech is dead. Citizens are prosecuted for words, jokes, and prayers. Debate is controlled. Dissent is punished. Their democracy is a façade.CONSEQUENCE: When speech dies, truth dies. When truth dies, ...

Group 1 - Coventry First LLC and its Co-Founder Alan H. Buerger filed a Motion to Dismiss a lawsuit from Abacus Global Management, arguing that the lawsuit is an attempt to silence constitutionally protected debate [1][2] - The Motion emphasizes that Abacus relied heavily on Lapetus Solutions, Inc. as its primary life expectancy provider, which has ceased operations as of August 31, 2025, raising concerns about Abacus's practices [2][3] - Buerger stated that Abacus's complaint seeks to suppress important discussions regarding the reliability of life expectancy estimates in the life settlement industry, which is crucial for investors and regulators [3] Group 2 - Coventry has been a leader in the secondary market for life insurance for over 20 years, having delivered more than $6 billion to policyowners who no longer need their policies [3]

RT Preston Byrne (@prestonjbyrne)Critically, they did this to Linehan for speech and conduct he engaged in *while in the United States.*The UK has declared war on the First Amendment and America needs to respond accordingly ...