Government & Security - The report indicates potential deployment of National Guard to Chicago and Baltimore [1]

Geopolitical Implications - The decision could limit the ability to deploy the National Guard to other cities [1] - The decision impacts potential troop deployments to Chicago [1]

Legal & Judicial Analysis - A federal judge ruled President Trump's deployment of troops to patrol Americans is illegal, resembling an illicit bid to create a national police force [2] - The ruling is based on a 19th-century law, the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA), forbidding the president from using the army for general law enforcement unless expressly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress [4][5] - The judge found Trump appeared to have an illicit purpose of creating a national police force with the president as its chief, raising concerns about autocratic national police forces [6] - The judge noted that Trump's DOJ's argument is so extreme that the President could assert he's unable to enforce obscure tax laws and then use the federalized National Guard to execute a range of laws, including election laws [11] - Judges are sounding the alarm and trimming Trump's powers, as he vows to appeal the case [14] Political & Governmental Implications - The concern is that Trump would use military powers to interfere in the election itself or in the vote counting if he thinks he might lose [12] - Trump's effort to explore getting the military to seize voting machines was abandoned when Giuliani said it went too far [13][14] - The administration's approach of seizing powers, threatening to defy courts, and trying to run out the clock resulted in months of troops in the streets of LA before the setback [15] - Trump is threatening to send troops to other places like Chicago, indicating a goal of a personalized police state which other leaders have used to try to steal elections and end democracy [20] Societal Impact & Response - The Democratic governor of Illinois responded to the president's remarks, refusing to call him and asking him to send troops to Chicago [23] - The governor urges citizens to know their rights, film things that they see happening in their neighborhoods, and be loud, as authoritarians thrive on silence [23][24]

A federal judge has ruled that President Trump's use of the National Guard in Los Angeles this summer was illegal. In his 52-page ruling, federal judge Charles Brier says that Trump violated a 19th century law barring the use of soldiers as cops. The judge then warned the efforts to send troops into other cities could amount to quote creating a national police force with the president as its chief.Joining us now, former federal prosecutor and former lawyer with the Department of Justice and the National Sec ...

Trump Says He’ll Send National Guard To Chicago And Baltimorehttps://t.co/H33dN0mcdO https://t.co/5hfmlNAaaZ ...

is a major court loss for the Trump administration. A federal judge says President Trump's use of the National Guard in Los Angeles was illegal. The judge ruling the deployment violates the Paccomatus Act.And he warns President Trump's calls to send troops into other American cities would amount to a national police force with the president as its chief. Before this ruling, Trump teased that Chicago is next on his list for troops. The administration is already planning to surge federal resources for immigra ...

Let's get right to our breaking news. A major court loss for the Trump administration. A federal judge says President Trump's use of the National Guard in Los Angeles was illegal.The judge ruling the deployment violates the Paccomatus Act. And he warns President Trump's calls to send troops into other American cities would amount to a national police force with the president as its chief. Before this ruling, Trump teased that Chicago is next on his list for troops.The administration is already planning to s ...

The decision could limit Trump’s ability to send the National Guard to other cities, as he threatens to send troops to Chicago. https://t.co/8xoHWucpxG (Photo: Mario Tama via Getty Images) https://t.co/xcFL2ZJU34 ...

And joining me now is Republican Senator James Langford of Oklahoma. Senator Langford, welcome back to Meet the Press. >> Thank you.Good Sunday morning to you. >> Well, good Sunday morning to you. It's always great to have you back.Let's start with that decision over tariffs on Friday. The court saying, quote, "Tariffs are a tax and only Congress has the power to impose taxes." Do you agree with the court's ruling that ultimately the ability to impose tariffs lies with Congress. >> Well, this is actually go ...

President Trump says he's taking his case on tariffs to the Supreme Court. No surprise there. This comes after a federal appeals court ruled last night that most of his global tariffs are illegal, which is a massive blow to the core of the president's aggressive trade policy and economic vision.Here's a huge caveat, though. The judges said the tariffs can stay in place as the case proceeds. The ruling held that Trump does not possess unlimited power.Shocker. under the law to impose taxes on nearly all US im ...