Core Insights - Tesla Inc is not only a headline maker due to Elon Musk but also relies on various suppliers that contribute to its electric vehicle (EV) success [1] - Companies like ON Semiconductor, Albemarle, and Panasonic play crucial roles in Tesla's supply chain, enhancing vehicle performance and battery production [2][3] Group 1: Key Suppliers - ON Semiconductor Corp is a leader in silicon carbide chips, essential for improving EV efficiency, and is a significant supplier for Tesla [2] - Albemarle Corp, a major lithium producer, remains integral to Tesla's battery strategy despite lithium price fluctuations, thanks to its scale and long-term contracts [2] - Panasonic Holdings Corp has been a consistent battery partner for Tesla, and its U.S.-based production may gain strategic importance due to tightening tariffs on Chinese imports [3] Group 2: Market Dynamics - New tariffs imposed by the U.S. and EU on Chinese-sourced EV parts may lead Tesla to shift towards North American or friend-shored supply chains [4] - Companies like Quantumscape Corp, which is developing solid-state battery technology, and Aptiv PLC, which supplies advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), are positioned to benefit from Tesla's pivot [4] Group 3: Investment Opportunities - Investors seeking to capitalize on Tesla's growth without the associated volatility can explore infrastructure investments linked to these key suppliers [5] - The increasing pressure for localization and tariffs may enhance the value of these supporting companies in the EV ecosystem [5]

Elon Musk has done a remarkable job of transforming Tesla. During his spell in politics some investors questioned whether he was the right boss. Unless robotaxis look like a winner soon, the questions will only return https://t.co/jA4J0KSpbu ...

Elon Musk has done a remarkable job of transforming Tesla. During his spell in politics some investors questioned whether he was the right boss. Unless robotaxis look like a winner soon, the questions will only return https://t.co/gGoJ4G7Dlf ...

Core Viewpoint - Tesla's second-quarter vehicle deliveries were disappointing, missing Wall Street estimates, yet the stock price increased, indicating investor focus may be shifting away from traditional EV metrics to other factors like future potential in robotaxis [2][4][7]. Delivery Performance - Tesla delivered 384,000 vehicles in Q2, a 14% decrease year-over-year, and slightly below Wall Street's estimate of 387,000 [2]. - The first quarter also saw disappointing deliveries of just below 337,000, down 13% year-over-year [2]. Market Expectations - Despite missing estimates, investors had anticipated a poor quarter due to intra-quarter data suggesting ongoing sales struggles, particularly in Europe and China [4]. - Some analysts believe this quarter could represent a bottom for Tesla, with expectations for improved deliveries in the latter half of the year [6]. Competitive Landscape - Tesla faces increasing competition from rival EV manufacturers offering cheaper and more capable vehicles, which may be impacting sales [5]. Stock Performance - The stock price increased by 3.3% despite the missed delivery estimates, suggesting that the market may not be valuing Tesla based on its current EV business fundamentals [7]. - Investors appear to be more focused on Tesla's future potential in robotaxis rather than its current delivery performance [8].

Industry Trend - Robotaxis are commercializing, presenting a winner-take-most opportunity in the US [1] Company Focus - ARK Invest believes Tesla ($TSLA) has major competitive advantages in the robotaxi market [1]

Core Viewpoint - Ford is currently undervalued with a forward 12-month price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 0.26, which is below industry levels and its own 5-year average, indicating potential investment opportunities despite recent stock performance [1][3][19] Valuation Comparison - Ford's P/S ratio of 0.26 is lower than General Motors' (GM) 0.27 and significantly lower than Tesla's (TSLA) 9.88, suggesting a favorable valuation compared to peers [1][8] - Despite a year-to-date stock increase of approximately 7%, Ford's valuation remains attractive compared to the industry's decline of over 19% [3][19] Growth Drivers - Ford Pro's strong demand and successful launch of the Super Duty are key catalysts for future earnings growth, supported by a growing number of paid software subscriptions [10][11] - The company has a robust liquidity position with around $45 billion in liquidity, including $27 billion in cash, which supports its investment priorities [11] - Ford's dividend yield of over 5% is appealing for income-focused investors, especially compared to the S&P 500's average yield of just over 1% [12] Challenges - The EV segment is facing significant losses, with a reported loss of $5.07 billion in 2024, driven by competition and high development costs [13] - The traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) business is expected to see reduced sales, impacting profitability [14] - Tariff-related challenges are projected to have a net negative impact of approximately $1.5 billion on adjusted EBIT in 2025 [15] Earnings Estimates - The Zacks Consensus Estimate indicates a year-over-year decline of 7% in sales and 40% in earnings for 2025 [16] - Recent revisions show a decrease in earnings estimates for the current quarter and upcoming periods, reflecting growing concerns about Ford's near-term performance [17] Conclusion - While Ford's stock appears cheap with a low P/S ratio and attractive dividend yield, the company faces headwinds in its EV and ICE segments, making the near-term outlook uncertain [19][20] - Existing investors may find reasons to hold due to the strong balance sheet and commitment to shareholder returns, while new investors may consider a wait-and-watch approach [20]

Core Insights - The comparison between Ford and Tesla highlights the future direction of the auto industry, particularly in electric vehicles (EVs) and robotaxis, with both companies facing similar opportunities and challenges [1] - Tesla's full-self-driving (FSD) robotaxi is seen as a strategic move to counteract declining sales and market share, while major automakers recognize the profit potential of robotaxis through recurring income from ride-per-mile revenue [2] Electric Vehicles and Affordability - Automakers need to make EVs more affordable to ensure their future viability, as current EVs are not cheap [2] - Ford's CEO emphasized the importance of developing affordable EVs to achieve profitability, indicating a shift in strategy [4] Robotaxi Development - Ford has faced setbacks in its robotaxi plans, notably after the shutdown of Argo AI, while Tesla is preparing to launch its unsupervised FSD/robotaxi service [14][15] - Tesla's ability to transform existing vehicles into robotaxis and produce a dedicated model, the Cybercab, gives it a competitive edge [8] Financial Performance - Ford's Model E segment reported significant losses, with a loss of $5.1 billion in 2024 and $849 million in Q1 2025, indicating challenges in achieving a profitable EV business [10] - In contrast, Tesla generated $7.1 billion in operating profit in 2024 and maintained a dominant market share of 43.5% in Q1 2025, compared to Ford's 7.7% [11] Future Outlook - Both companies plan to release low-cost models, but Tesla's ability to lower its average cost per car positions it better for sustainable profitability [13] - The auto industry is moving towards lower-cost EVs and robotaxis, with Tesla currently in the best position to meet these industry aims [18]

RT Tesla Owners Silicon Valley (@teslaownersSV)Yo, just rolled my Cybertruck on FSD 13.2.9 through city madness—damn, it’s next-level!Weaved through traffic, nailed construction zones, no disengagements. Felt like the truck was one step ahead of me. This is how you redefine driving.The Robotaxis are here & Tesla is leading the way!@tesla @Tesla_AI @cybertruck ...

RT Tesla Owners Silicon Valley (@teslaownersSV)Yo, just rolled my Cybertruck on FSD 13.2.9 through city madness—damn, it’s next-level!Weaved through traffic, nailed construction zones, no disengagements. Felt like the truck was one step ahead of me. This is how you redefine driving.The Robotaxis are here & Tesla is leading the way!@tesla @Tesla_AI @cybertruck ...

Core Viewpoint - The escalating feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has negatively impacted Tesla's stock, raising concerns about potential harm to the electric vehicle sector and Musk's companies [1][3]. Group 1: Impact on Tesla Stock - Tesla stock experienced its largest one-day market capitalization decline on Thursday, with investors worried about the implications of the feud on Musk-related companies [3]. - Tesla shares are down 20.7% year-to-date in 2025, with a notable drop of over 12% in the last five days [14]. Group 2: Government Policies and Subsidies - Trump has threatened to withdraw government subsidies related to SpaceX and eliminate EV tax credits, which could adversely affect Tesla and the broader electric vehicle market [3][10]. - The potential end of the $7,500 EV tax credit could harm Tesla, although Musk has previously supported the idea of ending this incentive, which analysts suggest might benefit Tesla by weakening its rivals [10][11]. Group 3: Autonomous Vehicles and Robotaxis - Trump's past opposition to autonomous vehicles raises concerns about the future of Tesla's robotaxi initiatives, especially as Musk prepares to launch the Tesla Cybercab [4][6]. - Despite a previous easing of restrictions on self-driving vehicles, Trump's recent comments indicate a possible return to opposition against autonomous vehicles [5][6]. Group 4: Brand Perception and Customer Base - Tesla has faced brand damage over the past year, with some customers trading in their vehicles due to Musk's political actions, potentially alienating its traditional customer base [7]. - The feud may deter Trump supporters, who previously showed interest in Tesla vehicles, from purchasing them [8]. Group 5: Government Investigations - The rift between Musk and Trump could lead to renewed investigations into Musk and his companies, which have already faced scrutiny from various government organizations [12]. - Trump's comments suggest that government contracts and subsidies benefiting Musk could be reconsidered, impacting SpaceX's operations [13].