Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the interdependence of positive guidance and negative warnings in promoting accountability among party members and officials [1] - Positive guidance aims to inspire responsibility and integrity by utilizing exemplary models and conducting immersive education activities [1] - Negative warnings focus on enhancing deterrent effects through the exposure and analysis of typical cases, reinforcing the importance of adhering to disciplinary and legal boundaries [1] Group 2 - The approach includes innovative educational mechanisms that combine case investigations with in-depth analysis of warning education resources [2] - The use of contrasting positive and negative examples in educational materials aims to establish a strong ideological defense against corruption [2] - The goal is to instill a correct understanding of power, performance, and career among party members, thereby strengthening their resistance to corruption [2]