本报讯 随着私家车保有量快速增长，部分小区因早期车位规划不足，车位紧张的问题日渐突出， 车辆停放秩序成为了小区业主关注的焦点问题。近日，北京市房山区人民法院审结了一起业主诉物业公 司车位管理纠纷案，认定物业公司以"按时足额缴纳物业费"作为限制业主参与地面车位摇号的行为无 效。 综上，法院最终判决物业公司以按时足额缴纳物业费作为限制小区业主参与小区车位摇号的行为无 效，驳回陈女士的其他诉讼请求。该判决现已生效。 法官提醒 由于车位紧张，陈女士所在的小区自2015年开始，采取摇号方式管理地面车位。物业公司分别于 2021年至2024年间四次发布摇号通知，均将"按时足额缴纳物业服务费（截至本年度）"列为报名必备条 件。陈女士因未按时缴费被拒绝参与摇号，遂将物业公司起诉至法院。陈女士认为该限制条件侵害了业 主权益，要求确认该限制行为无效，并要求物业公司支付额外产生的车位租赁费2800元。 物业公司辩称，该限制条件符合临时管理规约约定，且面向全体业主。目的在于核实报名人员身 份，了解业主真实需求，保障车位资源优先供给本小区业主。同时，陈女士房屋长期出租，名下另有地 下车位且存在转租行为，实际没有地面车位使用需求，所以不 ...

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the property management company's actions to clear the public area were legal and necessary to maintain community order and protect the rights of all homeowners, rejecting the compensation claim from Mr. Huang [1][2][3]. Group 1: Case Background - Mr. Huang planted flowers and built a "garden" on the public platform of his residence, leading to water leakage issues in Ms. Li's shop below, which she attributed to the roots of Mr. Huang's plants damaging the waterproof layer [1]. - After multiple requests for cleanup from Ms. Li, Mr. Huang refused to acknowledge responsibility, resulting in a stalemate [1]. - The property management company intervened and, with Mr. Huang's son's consent, conducted a cleanup, which Mr. Huang later contested as unauthorized [1]. Group 2: Court's Ruling - The court determined that Mr. Huang's extensive use of the public platform exceeded reasonable limits and caused neighbor disputes, obligating him to cooperate with the property management for cleanup [2]. - The property management's actions were deemed a legitimate exercise of their responsibilities, aimed at maintaining normal living conditions and protecting the rights of all residents [2]. Group 3: Legal and Community Implications - The judge emphasized the importance of property management services in ensuring the quality of life for residents and maintaining the cleanliness of shared spaces [2][3]. - The court highlighted that property management must adhere to legal regulations and contractual agreements while ensuring public interest, and homeowners must fulfill their obligations to avoid potential legal consequences [3].