Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the complexity of U.S.-China relations, suggesting that while both nations are major powers, their coexistence is fraught with challenges that differ from the Cold War dynamics between the U.S. and the Soviet Union [1][5][23] - The article discusses the potential for a "manageable" relationship characterized by both cooperation and competition, highlighting the need for a balance between these two aspects to prevent conflict [4][5][12] - It notes that despite the competitive nature of their relationship, there is a possibility for mutual coexistence through open communication, trust-building, and shared international responsibilities [5][19] Group 2 - The article outlines the importance of dialogue in U.S.-China relations, suggesting that "trust but dialogue" is a more appropriate framework than the Cold War's "trust but verify" [6][7] - It highlights the necessity of regular communication to avoid misunderstandings and misjudgments, especially in military encounters, as evidenced by the increasing frequency of risky air interceptions [8][10] - The article points out the critical need to prevent incidents in the Taiwan Strait, which could escalate tensions between the two nations [12][13] Group 3 - The article emphasizes the significance of cooperation in emerging fields such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and outer space, where both countries have a responsibility to establish rules and regulations [17][18] - It discusses the potential for collaboration in addressing global issues, such as the Middle East conflicts, where both nations have historically aligned interests [19][21] - The article concludes that while competition between the U.S. and China may intensify, there remains room for cooperation that does not impose excessive costs on either side [23]