中美贸易分歧

Search documents
中美第二轮贸易谈判:博弈还在继续,但留给美国的时间已经不多了
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-18 10:52
Core Points - The recent US-China trade talks in London mark the first meeting under the newly established trade consultation mechanism, following the Geneva discussions where both sides agreed to this framework [1] - The significance of the second round of negotiations is heightened due to the ongoing tariff disputes, with the US imposing tariffs as high as 145% on Chinese imports [3] - The focus of the negotiations has shifted from tariffs to key industries, particularly around rare earths and technology sectors, indicating a deeper competitive dynamic between the two economies [4][6] Group 1: Background and Context - The trade tensions escalated in April when the US announced comprehensive import tariffs, prompting retaliatory measures from China [3] - Initial agreements in Geneva aimed to reduce tariffs, but significant tariffs remained, particularly over 30% on new imports from China [3] - The recent talks in London were built on the consensus reached in Geneva, with both sides agreeing to continue discussions on key issues [3] Group 2: Key Issues and Negotiation Dynamics - The US is particularly focused on securing a reliable supply of rare earth minerals from China, which are critical for various industries [4] - The negotiations are now centered around each country's unique advantages, with China holding leverage in rare earths and the US in semiconductor technology [4][6] - The expectation is that resolving these supply chain issues will take time, as both countries have entrenched positions and interests [7] Group 3: Strategic Implications - The evolving nature of the negotiations suggests a long-term strategic competition rather than a quick resolution to tariff disputes [6][10] - The potential for a temporary agreement exists, but the underlying issues of supply chain dependencies and technological competition remain unresolved [7][11] - The current political landscape in the US, particularly with the upcoming elections, may influence the urgency and outcomes of these negotiations [8][13]