Group 1 - The core argument is that the perception of China's economic decline due to the US-China trade war and GDP comparisons is misleading, as it primarily stems from currency exchange rate fluctuations rather than actual economic performance [1][3] - The actual economic growth rate for China is projected to be around 4.5% by 2025, significantly higher than the US's projected growth of only 1.8% [3] - The trade war has forced China to develop its own technology, leading to advancements in sectors like semiconductor manufacturing, which were previously reliant on imports [3][5] Group 2 - China's reliance on exports to the US has decreased from 20% to 15%, while trade with ASEAN, the Middle East, and Russia has increased, indicating a diversification of trade partnerships [5] - Domestic consumption has become a more significant driver of China's economy, with its contribution rising from 55% to 65%, and sales of new energy vehicles increasing from 1 million to 8 million [5] - China possesses all industrial categories recognized by the United Nations, making its position in the global supply chain irreplaceable [7] Group 3 - The GDP of BRICS countries has surpassed that of the G7, and cooperation with the EU and the Middle East is strengthening, providing China with more strategic space on the international stage [7] - The future of a country is determined by its technological innovation capacity, industrial resilience, social cohesion, and strategic wisdom in the global context [7][9] - China is focused on maintaining its path and will reveal the true strengths and weaknesses of nations over time [9]