中国社科院西亚非洲所研究员余国庆表示，美国对伊朗采取的是两手措施，在极限施压的同时保留谈判 空间，试图以强大军事压力逼迫伊朗在谈判桌上放弃最关键的诉求。美方要求伊朗不能在国内保留浓缩 铀尤其是高丰度浓缩铀的生产和保有能力，还要求全面限制甚至终止伊朗导弹能力的发展。特朗普是在 用"以压促变、以压促和"的方式推动局势发展。 （来源：千龙网） 23日，美国海军"福特"号航母现身希腊克里特岛进行补给。在此之前，"林肯"号航母已抵达阿拉伯海。 美军即将在中东地区完成"双航母"部署。 次日，11架美军F-22战机飞抵以色列空军基地。加上已部署在卡塔尔、约旦等国的大批F-35、F-16战机 等空中力量，当前中东地区集结的美军兵力将达到2003年伊拉克战争后的最大规模。 美国总统特朗普在24日国会的国情咨文中威胁伊朗："任何人都不应该怀疑美国的决心。我们拥有地球 上最强大的军队。" 为何迟迟不动手？ 在23日公布的民调中，特朗普的支持率仅为36%，68%的美国民众认为特朗普对"国家最重要的问题"关 注不足，61%认为特朗普的政策会把国家引向"错误的方向"。 复旦大学中东研究中心主任孙德刚说，特朗普此前迟迟没有对伊朗"动手"就 ...

本报记者 白波 23日，美国海军"福特"号航母现身希腊克里特岛进行补给。在此之前，"林肯"号航母已抵达阿拉伯海。 美军即将在中东地区完成"双航母"部署。 "纳粹分子戈培尔说过，'谎话重复一千遍，就是真理'。美国和以色列正以此来推动针对伊朗的误导宣 传活动。"伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃25日表示，美国对伊朗核计划、弹道导弹等一切指控，不过是重复 着"弥天大谎"。 若战事不利将冲击选情 为何迟迟不动手？ 在23日公布的民调中，特朗普的支持率仅为36%，68%的美国民众认为特朗普对"国家最重要的问题"关 注不足，61%认为特朗普的政策会把国家引向"错误的方向"。 复旦大学中东研究中心主任孙德刚说，特朗普此前迟迟没有对伊朗"动手"就是因为军事部署尚未完成 ——一艘航母不足以支撑一场战争。在"福特"号驶向中东后，一旦他下定决心，动武只是时间问题。他 指出，国内支持率处于低谷的情况下，特朗普需要转移视线，采取军事打击行动来提振民众信心，特别 是通过一场战争来达到这一目的。 美伊今天将在瑞士日内瓦举行新一轮谈判，伊朗外长阿拉格齐可能与美国总统特使威特科夫会面。阿拉 格齐24日表示，伊朗"决心在最短时间内达成公正公平的协议"。他 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent military actions taken by the United States against Venezuela, highlighting the implications of these actions and the underlying motivations of the U.S. government [1] Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - On January 3, explosions were reported in Caracas, Venezuela, with U.S. officials confirming that President Trump ordered airstrikes against targets within Venezuela [1] - The Venezuelan government condemned these actions as "military aggression," indicating a significant escalation in U.S. pressure tactics [1] Group 2: U.S. Strategic Objectives - The U.S. has shifted from extreme pressure tactics to more aggressive military actions due to the lack of compliance from Venezuela, as President Maduro has refused to step down [1] - The U.S. aims to respond to domestic political agendas, particularly in relation to drug control, and to align with the Republican Party's objectives ahead of the midterm elections [1] Group 3: Domestic Implications - The U.S. government is closely monitoring public reaction to its military interventions abroad, as these actions may influence future policy decisions and strategic adjustments [1] - There appears to be a lack of significant opposition within the Republican Party regarding these military actions, suggesting a favorable environment for the administration to pursue its objectives [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses the recent military actions taken by the United States against Venezuela, indicating a shift from previous pressure tactics to more extreme measures, such as airstrikes ordered by President Trump [1][2] - Venezuela's government has condemned these actions as "military aggression," highlighting the ongoing tensions between the two nations and Venezuela's refusal to comply with U.S. demands [1][2] - The U.S. has been increasing its military presence around Venezuela since August of the previous year, indicating a strategy of economic strangulation through naval blockades, which has not led to the desired outcomes [1] Group 2 - President Maduro of Venezuela has rejected U.S. demands for his resignation and has signaled a willingness to negotiate on drug control issues, emphasizing the need for serious discussions rather than unilateral pressure from the U.S. [2] - The U.S. government's recent military actions are seen as a test of Venezuela's response, reflecting a strategy to push for change through pressure while also addressing domestic political agendas [2][4] - The U.S. is eager to implement its new national security strategy, which emphasizes the geopolitical importance of the Western Hemisphere, while also considering the potential domestic political repercussions of military interventions abroad [4]