依法审理胖东来诉网络"黑嘴"侵权案，维护企业商誉；推进清理拖欠中小企业账款，结案9166件、执行 到位311.42亿元；助力1481家企业重获新生，推动2.9万家"僵尸企业"依法出清……近日，最高人民法院 公布2025年规范涉企执法司法专项行动成绩单。规范涉企执法司法，有助于用好"看得见的手"和"看不 见的手"，坚持有效市场和有为政府相结合，帮助企业解决"维权之痛、承压之重、发展之困"，为企业 和企业家合法经营"撑腰打气"，助力企业稳定预期、安心经营。 守护合法权益 近年来，一些针对企业和企业创始人的网络谣言不断出现，发布者通过制造话题、炒作热点吸引流量并 从中获利。其中，胖东来诉网络"黑嘴"侵权案不仅引来网民围观，而且受到广大民营企业的关注。 2025年3月起，被告柴某前借助被告温某国实名注册的抖音账号"柴怼怼"，在多个网络社交平台发布关 于胖东来公司及其法定代表人于某来的视频，恶意抹黑诋毁；于某来随后作出回应，双方论战即刻冲上 网络热搜。此后，许昌胖东来公司、于某来以商业诋毁、名誉权纠纷为由，向河南省许昌市中级人民法 院提起诉讼，依法维权。最终，法院判决柴某前等4被告停止侵权、删除侵权视频、发布致歉声明并 ...

每经AI快讯，2月2日，上海市黄浦区人民政府办公室印发《黄浦区加快打造国际一流营商环境工作方 案（2026年）》。其中提到，保护企业合法权益。营造清朗网络环境，压实网站平台主体责任，持续打 击涉企网络谣言、"网络水军"等违法行为。规制牟利性职业举报和职业索赔，健全投诉举报异常名录的 管理、共享和应用机制。健全防范和化解拖欠账款工作机制，确保机关、事业单位零拖欠。 ...

Group 1 - The introduction of the "Hainan Province Administrative Inspection Regulations (Trial)" aims to standardize administrative inspections related to enterprises, aligning with national policies to enhance regulatory efficiency and reduce burdens on businesses [2][3] - The regulations emphasize a "no disturbance unless necessary" approach, intending to create a service-oriented environment that fosters market vitality and supports enterprise development [2][3] - The regulations are designed to improve government governance effectiveness, transitioning from a broad management style to a more precise and service-oriented regulatory approach, thereby optimizing the business environment [3] Group 2 - The regulations consist of six chapters with a total of twenty-nine articles, focusing on clarifying inspection rules, optimizing methods, and enhancing law enforcement supervision to address issues of redundant and inefficient inspections [4] - Key highlights include the establishment of clear inspection subjects, the requirement for administrative inspection items to be publicly listed, and the necessity for inspectors to present valid credentials [4][5] - The regulations promote a tiered and categorized inspection system based on risk levels and credit evaluations, aiming to reduce inspection frequency for compliant enterprises while increasing scrutiny for those with significant violations [5][6] Group 3 - The regulations protect enterprises from illegal inspections by prohibiting requests for unrelated or excessive documentation and ensuring that inspections do not disrupt normal business operations [7] - Enterprises are granted the right to be informed about inspection details, including the inspecting body and the basis for the inspection, and can seek assistance from professionals for complex issues [7] - There are provisions for enterprises to report violations of inspection regulations, reinforcing accountability for administrative bodies and their personnel [7]

Core Points - The ownership issue of Darwin Port in Australia has resurfaced, with a U.S. company linked to the government reportedly negotiating a lease agreement [1] - The Australian government has expressed intentions to reclaim Darwin Port from China's Landbridge Group, with U.S. private equity firm Balyon Capital Management engaging in discussions with the port's management [1][2] - Balyon is preparing a proposal to purchase a 99-year lease from Landbridge, with the price expected to be slightly above the AUD 506 million (approximately RMB 2.35 billion) paid by Landbridge in 2015 [1] - The Australian government has not provided assistance in the negotiations between Balyon and the port management, and it remains unclear if the government will support another foreign entity's bid [2] Group 1 - Balyon Capital Management has sent representatives to Darwin for discussions with the port's management [1] - The company manages assets worth USD 65 billion across various sectors, including defense and real estate [1] - The Australian government has been reviewing the lease since Landbridge won it in 2015, but has not identified any security risks [2][3] Group 2 - The Australian Labor Party member has stated the government's commitment to returning the port to Australian control [2] - Landbridge has made it clear that it does not intend to sell the lease, and if the government forcibly reclaims the port, it may need to provide financial support to a new buyer [3] - The Australian Prime Minister and former opposition leader have both announced plans to revoke the lease during the recent election campaign [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese company Landbridge Group's rights to operate the strategically significant Darwin Port in Australia should be fully protected, as it acquired the lease through market means [1] Group 1 - Cerberus Capital Management, a U.S. private equity firm, is reportedly planning to bid for Darwin Port [1] - The port is currently operated by the Chinese company Landbridge Group, which has raised concerns regarding its ownership [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasized the importance of protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the Chinese enterprise involved [1]