Group 1 - The U.S. government, led by President Trump, expresses disappointment over Russia's lack of action towards peace and has canceled a planned meeting with President Putin, indicating that future discussions are still possible but must yield positive results [1][3] - President Putin responds to U.S. sanctions, stating they are unfriendly and will not significantly impact the Russian economy, emphasizing the importance of dialogue over confrontation [2] - Putin clarifies that the recent meeting was postponed rather than canceled, and he reiterates the necessity of thorough preparation for any future discussions to avoid unproductive outcomes [2] Group 2 - Ukrainian President Zelensky declares that any territorial exchange with Russia is unacceptable and insists that peace negotiations should start with a ceasefire [4] - Zelensky advocates for increased pressure on Russia before negotiations can commence and suggests that frozen Russian assets should be utilized for purchasing weapons from Europe and the U.S. [4] - He also confirms that Ukraine has not used U.S. long-range weapons to strike targets within Russia and reveals that Ukraine's own long-range strike capabilities have reached a range of 3000 kilometers [4]

Core Viewpoint - Ukrainian President Zelensky stated that any form of territorial exchange with Russia is "unacceptable," emphasizing that peace plans should start with a ceasefire followed by negotiations [1] Group 1: Territorial Issues - Zelensky firmly rejected any concessions on territorial matters, asserting that Ukraine will not make territorial compromises [1] Group 2: Military and Financial Aspects - Zelensky called for increased pressure on Russia before negotiations can commence, suggesting that frozen Russian assets should be utilized to purchase weapons from Europe and the U.S. [1] - He indicated that Ukraine should be able to use these funds to develop its own weapons production capabilities [1] Group 3: Military Capabilities - Zelensky clarified that Ukraine has not used U.S.-provided long-range weapons to strike targets within Russia [1] - He revealed that Ukraine's independently developed long-range strike capabilities now have a range of up to 3,000 kilometers [1]

Core Viewpoint - Ukraine does not plan to hold a referendum to recognize Russian territorial occupation or amend its constitution, emphasizing a commitment to not relinquish any territory [1] Group 1: Ukraine's Stance on Territorial Integrity - Ukraine's Chief of Staff, Yermak, stated that there are no intentions to hold a referendum regarding the recognition of Russian occupation [1] - Yermak acknowledged the reality of Russian occupation in certain regions but emphasized Ukraine's current inability to reclaim these territories through military means [1] - The Ukrainian government aims to end the war and prevent future conflicts while maintaining a realistic approach to the situation [1] Group 2: International Relations and Cooperation - Yermak expressed confidence that new cooperation between Ukraine, the EU, and the US could lead to a more realistic stance from Russia [1] - US President Trump held meetings with Ukrainian President Zelensky and several European leaders, discussing the arrangement of a bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelensky [1] - Zelensky indicated that all territorial issues would be addressed in his discussions with Putin [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent meetings between Ukrainian President Zelensky and U.S. President Trump, along with European leaders, focusing on potential diplomatic resolutions to the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict, including security guarantees and territorial issues [3][4]. Group 1: Bilateral and Multilateral Meetings - Zelensky's visit to the White House marks a significant diplomatic engagement, with discussions centered on trilateral talks involving the U.S., Russia, and Ukraine [5][6]. - European leaders expressed support for Ukraine during the multilateral meeting, emphasizing the need for unity and a coordinated approach to the conflict [7][8]. Group 2: Security Guarantees - Trump indicated the possibility of U.S. military involvement in peacekeeping efforts in Ukraine, suggesting a shift in U.S. policy [12]. - Zelensky highlighted Ukraine's need for comprehensive security guarantees, including military support and intelligence, to pressure Russia towards peace [12][13]. - Reports suggest Ukraine may commit to purchasing $100 billion worth of military equipment from the U.S. in exchange for security assurances post-peace agreement [12][13]. Group 3: Territorial Issues - Zelensky presented key territorial concerns to Trump, seeking solutions to the ongoing disputes, including the status of Crimea [14]. - Trump suggested that Ukraine might need to concede territory to Russia to expedite peace, a statement that drew significant attention [14]. Group 4: Ceasefire vs. Peace Agreement - Trump expressed skepticism about the necessity of a ceasefire before reaching a peace agreement, proposing that negotiations could occur concurrently with ongoing conflict [16]. - In contrast, both Ukraine and European leaders advocate for a ceasefire as a prerequisite for any long-term resolution [17]. - Russian officials have indicated that discussions should first address the root causes of the conflict before considering a ceasefire [18].

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between Russian President Putin and US President Trump is imminent, with both Russia and Ukraine refusing to make concessions on territorial issues [1] Group 1: Russia's Position - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Fatyeyev stated that the territorial structure of the Russian Federation is enshrined in the constitution [1] - He accused Europe of verbally supporting diplomatic efforts to resolve the Ukraine crisis while secretly undermining them by continuing to supply weapons and funds to Ukraine and increasing sanctions pressure on Russia [1] Group 2: Ukraine's Position - Ukrainian President Zelensky, during a joint press conference with German Chancellor Merz, outlined five consensus principles reached by European and American leaders regarding negotiations with Russia [1] - These principles include direct Ukrainian participation in the peace resolution of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, preparation for a trilateral meeting involving the US, Russia, and Ukraine, a ceasefire, and clear security guarantees for Ukraine [1] Group 3: US Involvement - President Trump warned that if President Putin does not accept the ceasefire proposal during their meeting in Alaska, he will face "very serious consequences" [1] - Trump expressed hope for a trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelensky if the discussions with Putin progress positively [1]

Group 1 - The meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin is scheduled to take place on March 15 in Anchorage, Alaska, and will be a one-on-one format [1] - Both the US and Russia believe that the leaders' meeting will proceed smoothly [2][3] - The Russian Defense Ministry reported that Ukraine is allegedly planning provocative actions to disrupt the upcoming US-Russia presidential meeting [5] Group 2 - Ukrainian President Zelensky stated that any decisions regarding Ukraine that do not involve Ukraine's participation are unacceptable [7] - Zelensky mentioned that future leader-level meetings will occur, but specific dates are not yet determined [9] - Ukraine emphasized that it will not make concessions on territorial issues, with officials asserting that Ukraine's territorial integrity is not negotiable [10][11] Group 3 - An online meeting involving the US, EU, and Ukraine is scheduled for March 13, with President Trump and Vice President Pence participating alongside President Zelensky and European allies [12][13] - The EU Commission spokesperson confirmed that EU Commission President von der Leyen will attend a multi-party video conference on Ukraine issues, indicating ongoing support for Ukraine and the development of a new round of sanctions against Russia [15]

Group 1 - The potential meeting between Russian and American presidents could mark a significant historical turning point for the Russia-Ukraine ceasefire [1][2] - Russia has expressed a high-profile stance regarding the meeting, suggesting the UAE as a possible venue and indicating a willingness to engage in dialogue [2][4] - The U.S. has not fully confirmed the meeting's details, emphasizing that a meeting between Putin and Zelensky is not a prerequisite for a Trump-Putin meeting [3][4] Group 2 - Ukraine is actively engaging with European leaders to secure support, emphasizing that the initiative for ending the conflict lies with Russia [6][7] - European leaders, including the President of the European Commission and the French President, have reiterated their commitment to supporting Ukraine and facilitating a ceasefire [7] - The complexities of the conflict, including differing positions on ceasefire and territorial issues, indicate that achieving consensus will be challenging [9][10]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Vice President emphasizes that both Russia and Ukraine must make territorial concessions to reach a resolution in the ongoing conflict [1] Group 1 - The statement reflects a diplomatic approach aimed at encouraging negotiations between the conflicting parties [1] - The call for concessions indicates a shift towards compromise, which may influence future peace talks and geopolitical dynamics in the region [1]