信用+监管
Search documents
广西柳州市市场监管局校园食品安全治理案例荣获全国大奖
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-04 07:35
中国质量新闻网讯 日前,在第七届中国(台州)信用建设高峰论坛上,由广西柳州市市场监管局报送 的案例《以信用治理构建柳州版校园安全新格局》,入选优秀信用案例。这一荣誉不仅体现了"信用 +监管"模式在柳州校园安全领域的成功运用,更为全国校园食品安全治理提供了可复制、可推广的 "柳 州样本"。 信用"可视化",让安全一目了然 在柳州的试点学校,食堂门口醒目位置都挂着一块 "信用等级公示牌"。A、B、C、D四个等级,不仅是 食堂管理水平的"成绩单",更是师生家长择餐的"风向标"。制定了《学校食堂食品安全信用记分评定 表》,就像一本 "安全驾照" ,从日常管理到硬件设施,从操作规范到社会反馈,全部纳入考评。一旦 发现问题,动态扣分立即启动,监管不再"一阵风",而是"全天候"。 结果"真运用",让奖惩落地有声 信用评价如果只停留在纸面上,那就是"花架子"。柳州模式的核心在于 "真用",将信用等级深度融入 学校考核、干部管理与执纪监督中,形成了强有力的治理闭环。对守信者:信用等级高的学校,在评优 评先中占得先机,相关负责人甚至在职称评定、职级晋升中也能获得"加分"。对失信者:信用等级低的 学校,将面临约谈、限期整改,甚至相 ...
超五千家培训机构采用“先学后付”和数字人民币两类收费模式
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-24 12:04
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of adopting a "pay after learning" model in training institutions to alleviate the financial burden on parents and students [1][2] - Guangdong Province has implemented measures to regulate off-campus training, enhancing the quality of education resources available to students [1][2] - The "pay after learning" model aims to address long-standing issues of refund difficulties and financial misconduct in the training sector, ensuring consumer rights are protected [2] Group 2 - In 2023, multiple government departments in Guangdong jointly developed a plan to encourage the adoption of the "pay after learning" model, with a goal of significantly increasing the number of institutions using this model over the next five years [2] - Over 5,000 training institutions in Guangdong have adopted either the "pay after learning" or digital currency payment models, with total transaction amounts exceeding 20 billion [2] - Zhuhai City has established a mediation center for training disputes, utilizing a collaborative approach involving various stakeholders to provide legal support and conflict resolution services [3] Group 3 - Zhuhai is exploring a new "credit + regulation" model for non-academic training institutions, incorporating a credit rating system to promote industry standards and accountability [4] - The credit system involves voluntary participation from institutions, third-party evaluations, and a comprehensive regulatory framework to enhance the overall governance of the training sector [4]