Group 1 - The core task for the provincial party history departments this year is to focus on "learning from history to serve the present and educate people," advancing party history research, writing, and education [1] - Key publications will include oral histories and records of significant developments in Sichuan, particularly those related to President Xi Jinping's guidance [1] - The provincial party history research office will initiate the compilation of contemporary Sichuan party history documents, focusing on materials from party congresses and five-year plans since the 18th National Congress [1] Group 2 - A collaborative mechanism will be established to collect historical documents and oral histories related to significant events such as the Eighteenth Army's entry into Tibet and the construction of the common prosperity experimental zone [1] - The province aims to produce high-quality historical works, aligning with central party history standards, and will focus on the Red Army's Long March and the Third Front construction in Sichuan [1] - The provincial party history research office will create a multimedia educational framework, including theoretical readings, popular books, audiovisual products, and premium courses to promote party history [2]

作者：汪效驷（安徽省中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心特约研究员、安徽师范大学历史学院教授） 近年来，历史研究的"情感转向"不仅是国际史学发展的趋势，更为深化中共党史研究提供了新的分析维 度和解释框架。情感史关注历史情境中人的情感体验、表达与互动，为我们理解中国共产党何以赢得人 民拥护、凝聚变革力量，提供了从"心"出发的观察视角。从历史中汲取智慧和力量，尤其需要把握党与 人民之间深厚的情感纽带。而情感史正是深入理解党的初心使命、伟大精神与执政基础的一条重要学术 进路。近年来，诸多相关研究成果不断涌现，标志着情感史正逐渐进入党史研究的中心视野。然而，情 感史在拓展党史解释空间的同时，其方法论的内在张力与研究边界等问题也日益凸显。如何在理论借鉴 与实证研究之间建立平衡，在情感诠释与党史发展的结构性分析之间形成对话，是推动情感史研究走向 深入的关键。 对党史研究的解释力拓展 情感史的解释力，首先体现在对传统党史研究范式的丰富与深化。传统党史叙事侧重于路线政策、组织 建设与重大事件的因果关联和宏观意义，情感史则将曾被相对忽视的党员情感、群众心态与集体情绪等 置于考察视域，致力于揭示驱动历史行为的情感逻辑与心态机制。笔者 ...

Group 1 - The core argument emphasizes the importance of both specialization and broad knowledge in party history research, suggesting that a researcher should not only master their field but also possess an outsider's perspective to identify issues [1][2] - The drawbacks of excessive specialization are highlighted, including the risks of narrow focus and fragmented knowledge, which can lead to a stagnant and isolated field of study [2][3][4] Group 2 - The article outlines the concept of "通" (communication) in research, which includes four dimensions: "纵通" (vertical communication), "横通" (horizontal communication), "内通" (internal communication), and "外通" (external communication) [5][6] - "纵通" refers to understanding historical continuity by connecting past and present, while "横通" emphasizes the interrelation between different aspects of party history and its context within broader historical narratives [6][7] - "内通" focuses on mastering the theories and methods within the discipline, and "外通" stresses the importance of knowledge from other disciplines to enrich understanding and analysis [8][9]