Group 1 - The core argument is that despite Trump's strong rhetoric about bringing manufacturing back to the U.S., many companies prefer to stay in China due to the rational choice driven by policies and economic realities [1][3][5] - Business leaders express that remaining in China is the least risky option, as tariffs and unpredictable policies create a challenging environment for relocation [1][3] - The U.S. government's high tariffs on alternative manufacturing centers like Vietnam, Cambodia, and Indonesia further complicate the situation, making it difficult for companies to consider moving out of China [3][5] Group 2 - The reliance on China's supply chain and the interconnectedness of global industries mean that Trump's tariff strategy negatively impacts not only U.S. companies but also other countries [5][7] - The so-called "manufacturing return" initiative is criticized as a political performance without substantial backing, as companies face high tariffs and supply chain risks [5][7] - The reality of the situation reveals that U.S. manufacturing cannot regain its competitive edge through political slogans alone, as the stability of Chinese manufacturing remains strong [7]