Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court's ruling on the case involving Hu and five other directors of Smart Micro Display Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. highlights the distinction between the responsibilities of directors and shareholders regarding capital contributions, emphasizing that directors should not bear joint liability for shareholders' unpaid contributions beyond their diligence obligations [2][3][4][18]. Summary by Sections Case Background - The case originated in January 2015 when Smart Micro Display entered bankruptcy due to changes in the business environment, with shareholders owing nearly $5 million in registered capital [3][10]. - The bankruptcy administrator sought joint compensation from the directors for the unpaid contributions, leading to a series of court rulings [3][4]. Legal Proceedings - The initial ruling in 2019 held the directors liable for the full amount due to their failure to fulfill their obligation to urge shareholders to pay their contributions [3][11]. - Following an appeal, the Supreme People's Court accepted the prosecution's appeal, leading to a re-evaluation of the directors' responsibilities [4][18]. Supreme Court's Ruling - The Supreme Court's final ruling determined that three of the directors would only be liable for 10% of the company's losses, reflecting their level of fault rather than imposing joint liability for the entire amount [4][18]. - The ruling clarified that the directors' obligation to urge capital contributions is distinct from the shareholders' obligation to contribute capital, thus preventing the transfer of shareholder liability to directors [16][25]. Implications for Corporate Governance - The case has sparked discussions on the responsibilities of directors in urging capital contributions and the potential risks they face in fulfilling these duties [5][12]. - Legal experts emphasize the need for clear distinctions between the obligations of directors and shareholders to avoid undue burdens on directors [16][25]. Legislative Context - The case occurred before the recent amendments to the Company Law, which now explicitly outlines the responsibilities of directors regarding shareholder contributions [14][22]. - The successful prosecution appeal aligns with the revised Company Law, reinforcing the need for accurate legal interpretations and the protection of corporate governance structures [20][24].

证券代码：300400 证券简称：劲拓股份 公告编号：2025-019 深圳市劲拓自动化设备股份有限公司 本公司及监事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 一、监事会会议召开情况 深圳市劲拓自动化设备股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）第五届监事会第二 十三次会议于 2025 年 5 月 19 日下午 15:30 以现场表决和通讯表决相结合的方式 在深圳市宝安区石岩街道水田社区祝龙田北路 8 号劲拓高新技术中心（劲拓光电 产业园）研发中心 15 楼第一会议室召开。会议通知已于 2025 年 5 月 18 日以通 讯方式送达全体监事。本次会议由监事会主席王爱武先生主持，应参加表决监事 次监事会的召集和召开符合国家有关法律、行政法规、部门规章、规范性文件及 《公司章程》的规定。 二、监事会会议审议情况 公司根据《公司法（2023年修订）》及中国证监会《关于新 <公司法> 配套 制度规则实施相关过渡期安排》 《上市公司章程指引》等规定，修订《公司章程》 中有关条款、取消监事会，由董事会审计委员会承接监事会职能。因此，公司拟 一并废止《监事会议事规则》并将该议案提交股东会 ...