内容审核机制
Search documents
上万“僵尸账号”罕见突袭快手直播,安全专家揭秘“攻击链”:几万个账户级别的攻击,整体成本可能在百万元以上
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-23 15:04
每经记者|王郁彪 每经编辑|何小桃 文多 12月22日晚10点左右,一场突如其来的大规模网络攻击席卷了快手直播平台。 数万个被操控的"僵尸账号"同步涌入直播间,色情、暴力等违规内容在短时间内集中爆发,部分直播间观看人数甚至破万。 舆论哗然,多位群众直接报案。快手当晚紧急回应称,平台遭到灰黑产攻击,已紧急处理修复中。快手称,平台坚决反对违规内容,相应情况已上报给相 关部门,并报警。 图片来源:网络截图 或受此事件影响,市值超2700亿港元的快手-W(HK01024)股价在12月23日盘中一度下跌超5%。据公告,经全力处置与系统修复,快手应用的直播功能 已逐步恢复正常服务。快手应用的其他服务未受影响。 平台紧急拉闸背后,是什么灰黑产如此猖獗?直播审核防线为何崩溃?就连快手这种老牌厂商都招架不住?《每日经济新闻》记者多方采访了解,类似大 规模事件在行业内确实堪称罕见,背后,一场针对网络平台内容安全防线的技术战正无声博弈,激烈空前。 一度封禁不止 快手直接下架直播频道 对于快手来说,刚刚过去的一晚,惊心动魄。 《每日经济新闻》记者注意到,有用户在社交平台发布的录频信息显示,当时快手平台直播频道内出现了存在大量色情、暴 ...
演员吐槽小红书审核机制离谱,同样的视频内容审核时间比其他平台都要长
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-06-18 03:36
Core Viewpoint - The recent complaints regarding Xiaohongshu's content review mechanism highlight increasing difficulties for creators, suggesting a shift towards a more restrictive and less transparent process that may ultimately harm the platform's user experience and content quality [1][4]. Group 1: Content Review Mechanism - An actor expressed frustration over Xiaohongshu's review process, noting that despite a Vlog being approved, it was not visible to others, indicating a lack of transparency in the review system [1]. - The actor reported that the review time on Xiaohongshu has become longer compared to other platforms, with many posts appearing approved but remaining unseen by the public [4]. - Users have echoed similar sentiments, criticizing the platform for arbitrary restrictions and a lack of clear communication regarding content approval [4][9]. Group 2: Community Standards and User Experience - Xiaohongshu has implemented a "Community Convention" that emphasizes genuine sharing and friendly interaction, aiming to foster a positive community environment [10]. - Despite these guidelines, users have noted that inappropriate content often gets approved while valuable content is frequently blocked or deleted, leading to dissatisfaction with the platform's current state [4][9]. - The platform's focus on preventing harmful content may inadvertently lead to a reliance on AI-generated content, raising concerns about the authenticity and engagement of the community [4].