Group 1 - The Chinese government is closely monitoring the situation in Iran and will take necessary measures to protect the safety of Chinese citizens traveling there [3] - China firmly opposes the trade war initiated by the U.S. and emphasizes that there are no winners in such conflicts, reaffirming its commitment to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests [4] - China maintains its position on the stability and security of global critical mineral supply chains, acknowledging the responsibility of all parties to reduce reliance on imports from China [5] Group 2 - China supports Iran in maintaining national stability and opposes interference in other countries' internal affairs, as well as the use or threat of force in international relations [6] - The Chinese government has not confirmed reports regarding Iran's potential absence from the BRICS military exercise, suggesting inquiries be directed to the relevant authorities [6]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Congress Speaker Mike Johnson believes that the White House is handling the Greenland issue through diplomatic channels and does not think there is any discussion about using military force against Greenland [1] Group 1 - Johnson stated that the Trump administration is discussing a "range of options" for acquiring Greenland, but emphasized that military action is not currently being considered [1] - Johnson clarified that while the U.S. always retains military options on any issue, the approach to Greenland is clearly diplomatic [1] - The White House Press Secretary, Caroline Levitt, mentioned that military action is always a viable option, but Johnson interpreted this as a general statement rather than a specific plan for Greenland [1]