冲锋衣性能测试
Search documents
冲锋衣比较试验:骆驼、狼爪、海澜之家等样品抗湿性能较弱
Zhong Guo Neng Yuan Wang· 2025-12-06 15:15
Core Insights - The article discusses the results of a comparative test conducted by the Shenzhen Consumer Council on 16 brands of outdoor jackets, highlighting the performance of these jackets in terms of waterproofing, breathability, and durability [1][3][4]. Group 1: Test Results Overview - All 16 jacket samples met the basic requirements for tear strength according to national standards, but over half of the samples had tear strength below 20N, indicating weaker performance [1][6]. - Specific brands such as UNDER ROCK, Camel, and The North Face showed lower tear strength, with UNDER ROCK's sample having a tear strength of only 9.3N, which is a quarter of the strength of the best-performing brand [3][6]. - The overall quality of the samples was stable, but significant performance differences were noted across various tests [3][4]. Group 2: Waterproofing and Moisture Resistance - The test evaluated surface moisture resistance and static water pressure, both critical for assessing waterproof performance [7][9]. - Seven brands, including Li Ning and Anta, achieved a surface moisture resistance rating of 4 or higher after three washes, indicating better waterproof capabilities [7][9]. - Conversely, brands like Camel and The North Face scored lower, with moisture resistance ratings of 2.5 and 3, respectively [9]. Group 3: Recommendations for Consumers - The Shenzhen Consumer Council advises consumers to check for the GB/T 32614-2023 standard label when purchasing jackets, as it indicates the level of waterproof and breathability features [10]. - Consumers are encouraged to select jackets with tightly woven fabrics and high-quality waterproof coatings, and to avoid those with strong odors that may indicate harmful chemical residues [10]. - It is recommended to minimize high-intensity washing and prolonged soaking of jackets to maintain their functional properties [10].
实测16款冲锋衣!防水、耐磨、透湿...谁的性能更能打?
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-11-21 06:43
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a comparative test conducted by the Shenzhen Consumer Council on 16 different brands of outdoor jackets, highlighting the importance of features such as waterproofing, durability, and comfort in outdoor apparel [1][3]. Group 1: Testing Brands and Prices - The tested brands include The North Face, Decathlon, Camel, Quechua, Jack Wolfskin, Xtep, JD.com, Li Ning, Toread, Semir, HLA, Kelty, Shixia, Taiping Bird, Columbia, and Anta [3]. - The sampling prices for the jackets range from 209.75 yuan to 1927 yuan [3]. Group 2: Testing Standards and Chemical Safety - The testing was based on the national standard GB/T 32614-2023, which includes chemical safety indicators such as PFOS and PFOA [4]. - Among the 16 jackets tested, only two brands, Decathlon and Quechua, were labeled as "fluorine-free" products [4]. - All tested samples showed no detectable levels of PFOS, and 8 samples had no detectable levels of PFOA, with 10 samples meeting the limit of <1.0μg/m² for both substances [4]. Group 3: Physical Performance and Durability - All 16 samples met the standard requirements for tear strength, with 7 samples exceeding 20N in both directions, indicating good durability [6]. - The abrasion resistance of all samples met the standard requirement of ≥10,000 cycles, and the appearance after washing and lightfastness also complied with the standards [6]. Group 4: Waterproof Performance - The waterproof performance was evaluated based on surface wetting resistance and hydrostatic pressure [7][9]. - After three washes, 7 samples achieved a surface wetting resistance of level 4 or higher, indicating good waterproofing [7]. - Five samples scored high in hydrostatic pressure tests, demonstrating strong waterproof capabilities [10]. Group 5: Breathability - The moisture permeability rate is crucial for comfort, with 6 samples exceeding 8000g/㎡•24h after three washes, indicating good breathability [11]. Group 6: Overall Evaluation - Among the 16 tested samples, 7 received a five-star rating based on laboratory testing results [12].